Anonymous wrote:Get out of here with this garbage. A woman can leave a man at any time, for any reason, or even for no reason at all. You can even leave him at any time if you're married to him right now. And in that case, when you leave, he has to pay you money! It is literally impossible for him to steal your time or your fertility because you have total control over it.
If you can't get pregnant then that's on you. If he is refusing to make you pregnant - there's the door right there. Walk out now, he can't stop you.
Anonymous wrote:The thing is women have right to divorce these men and move on, freeze embryos etc but they chose to stay in these fruitless pointless marriages. So it's the women mistake just as much as his avoidance of commitment to her
Anonymous wrote:No one is stealing anyone sfertility. If a man shows you who he really is, believe him. It’s truly that simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happened to me.
Well I’m in a marriage where I haven’t had a child yet due to lack of interest and cooperation from my husband. Now I’m too terrified to leave as bow can I divorce, fall in love and have a baby with rapidly declining fertility?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the problem is that there’s a lot of stigma around divorced women. [Somehow the 80% of women who initiate divorce manage to overcome that stigma. ]
We’re pressured to stick to our vows, even after a man changed the terms of the agreement and avoids having kids. [Who is doing this pressuring? Not DCUM Relationships, that's for sure. Here the all-purpose recommendation to any man problem is "divorce him".
You know how every time a man whines about a dead bedroom, the general female response is "she doesn't owe you sex"? That is changing the terms of the agreement, from his point of view, and you know full well that he feels pressured to stay in the marriage even though it sucks to be him. But to return to the subject at hand, guess what, he doesn't owe you babies. If he wants to remain celibate rather than make you pregnant, well, his body his choice, right? If he wanted to have kids and you didn't, how would you feel about him arguing that you changed the terms of the agreement and you owe him kids?]
Plus, it feels daunting. Divorce, dating, and remarriage can take years. So it feels easier to stick it out another couple years in hopes he’ll come around. [And of course you will take full responsibility for choosing poorly in the first place.]
I had to issue an ultimatum, and he said yes to kids but kept hemming and hawing. So I made it clear I was getting ready to date again and went off BC. Ended up pregnant, but it’s not a route I’d do again. I would just divorce the minute I could tell he was trying to back out.
[How is this different from him making you pregnant against your will? You coerced him into doing something he didn't want. And you're happy to argue it was all his fault really.]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the problem is that there’s a lot of stigma around divorced women. [Somehow the 80% of women who initiate divorce manage to overcome that stigma. ]
We’re pressured to stick to our vows, even after a man changed the terms of the agreement and avoids having kids. [Who is doing this pressuring? Not DCUM Relationships, that's for sure. Here the all-purpose recommendation to any man problem is "divorce him".
You know how every time a man whines about a dead bedroom, the general female response is "she doesn't owe you sex"? That is changing the terms of the agreement, from his point of view, and you know full well that he feels pressured to stay in the marriage even though it sucks to be him. But to return to the subject at hand, guess what, he doesn't owe you babies. If he wants to remain celibate rather than make you pregnant, well, his body his choice, right? If he wanted to have kids and you didn't, how would you feel about him arguing that you changed the terms of the agreement and you owe him kids?]
Plus, it feels daunting. Divorce, dating, and remarriage can take years. So it feels easier to stick it out another couple years in hopes he’ll come around. [And of course you will take full responsibility for choosing poorly in the first place.]
I had to issue an ultimatum, and he said yes to kids but kept hemming and hawing. So I made it clear I was getting ready to date again and went off BC. Ended up pregnant, but it’s not a route I’d do again. I would just divorce the minute I could tell he was trying to back out.
[How is this different from him making you pregnant against your will? You coerced him into doing something he didn't want. And you're happy to argue it was all his fault really.]
Anonymous wrote:I think the problem is that there’s a lot of stigma around divorced women. [Somehow the 80% of women who initiate divorce manage to overcome that stigma. ]
We’re pressured to stick to our vows, even after a man changed the terms of the agreement and avoids having kids. [Who is doing this pressuring? Not DCUM Relationships, that's for sure. Here the all-purpose recommendation to any man problem is "divorce him".
You know how every time a man whines about a dead bedroom, the general female response is "she doesn't owe you sex"? That is changing the terms of the agreement, from his point of view, and you know full well that he feels pressured to stay in the marriage even though it sucks to be him. But to return to the subject at hand, guess what, he doesn't owe you babies. If he wants to remain celibate rather than make you pregnant, well, his body his choice, right? If he wanted to have kids and you didn't, how would you feel about him arguing that you changed the terms of the agreement and you owe him kids?]
Plus, it feels daunting. Divorce, dating, and remarriage can take years. So it feels easier to stick it out another couple years in hopes he’ll come around. [And of course you will take full responsibility for choosing poorly in the first place.]
I had to issue an ultimatum, and he said yes to kids but kept hemming and hawing. So I made it clear I was getting ready to date again and went off BC. Ended up pregnant, but it’s not a route I’d do again. I would just divorce the minute I could tell he was trying to back out.
[How is this different from him making you pregnant against your will? You coerced him into doing something he didn't want. And you're happy to argue it was all his fault really.]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happened to me.
Well I’m in a marriage where I haven’t had a child yet due to lack of interest and cooperation from my husband. Now I’m too terrified to leave as bow can I divorce, fall in love and have a baby with rapidly declining fertility?
Anonymous wrote:The Jennifer Anniston story reminds me of this. So many times a man wastes a woman’s time only to divorce or leave her in her 30s and childless. While the man goes on to marry and have children the woman is left robbed of her fertile and out of time to have kids of her own.
This is criminal!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've been watching The Vow on HBO and following along with other podcasts surrounding the NXIVM trial. The leader Keith Raniere told dozens of women that he would have a baby with them, and then he would renege and tell them they'd blown their chance because of an "ethical breach" like vaguely flirting with another man. And now these women are too old to have babies. These women were brainwashed and abused and I think it's safe to say he stole their fertility.
Play stupid games with some cult leader weirdo, win stupid prizes.