Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would Russian influence on the election be less objectionable if they formed a PAC, wined and dined politicians, gave their kids no-show jobs and filled their pockets with cash?
No. It’s no less objectionable that their money keeps killing us via the NRA, either.
Right because prior to their involvement NRA was mostly handing out cookies and cuddling kittens. Wake up. America's love of guns is entirely homegrown.
I remember the NRA of the 80s, because my father was (and is) a member. I disagreed with it then but I really disagree with it now. The “gun safety classes, responsible gun owner, deer hunting is a family sport!” NRA of the 1980s is a different species from the “kindergarten teachers should be armed and AR-15s are normal hunting rifles” NRA of today. You wake up. The GOP is riddled with treasonous rot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would Russian influence on the election be less objectionable if they formed a PAC, wined and dined politicians, gave their kids no-show jobs and filled their pockets with cash?
No. It’s no less objectionable that their money keeps killing us via the NRA, either.
Right because prior to their involvement NRA was mostly handing out cookies and cuddling kittens. Wake up. America's love of guns is entirely homegrown.

Anonymous wrote:Would Russian influence on the election be less objectionable if they formed a PAC, wined and dined politicians, gave their kids no-show jobs and filled their pockets with cash?
Anonymous wrote:Russia prefers Biden in power, as he enriches them with high oil prices. If Russia can help Biden by having someone admit to helping Republicans, then they will do so.
Anonymous wrote:Question: Why do you so fervently believe the words of a person from a regime that constantly traffics in disinformation and propaganda?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would Russian influence on the election be less objectionable if they formed a PAC, wined and dined politicians, gave their kids no-show jobs and filled their pockets with cash?
No. It’s no less objectionable that their money keeps killing us via the NRA, either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just came on here to post about this. Why is this not being shouted from the rooftops? This is unbelievable.
Americans don't want to believe that we are susceptible to this type of influence operation.
I feel pretty certain that almost everything we've seen for the last seven-ish years is foreign influenced. I don't believe Trump is a witting or active player, but that he, his family, and his business/political organization have been turned against the US by foreign actors and with the knowing or unknowing help of US citizens.
Although I doubt what I'm about to say, I wonder if any member of the Trump family have regrets about being turned against the US. What a legacy to leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just came on here to post about this. Why is this not being shouted from the rooftops? This is unbelievable.
Americans don't want to believe that we are susceptible to this type of influence operation.
I feel pretty certain that almost everything we've seen for the last seven-ish years is foreign influenced. I don't believe Trump is a witting or active player, but that he, his family, and his business/political organization have been turned against the US by foreign actors and with the knowing or unknowing help of US citizens.
Anonymous wrote:Would Russian influence on the election be less objectionable if they formed a PAC, wined and dined politicians, gave their kids no-show jobs and filled their pockets with cash?