Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OMG. You can’t be serious. It’s #28. I can’t even believe you fell for this.
https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/computer-science-rankings
Last time I checked STEM was more than CS. Why do all these people only focus on CS? Chemistry, biology, bio-engineering, mathematics, geology etc. C'mon people STEM is a wide group of disciplines and UVA is doing better but not anywhere it should be.
Anonymous wrote:
OMG. You can’t be serious. It’s #28. I can’t even believe you fell for this.
https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/computer-science-rankings
Anonymous wrote:UVA is terrible for STEM, all of their STEM programs are sub-par and the CS program is especially weak. W&M is OK, the best option of the three is Tech. I would would highly consider GMU for CS, the name is not as flashy but the CS program is excellent.
Anonymous wrote:VT CpE grad here - Absolutely LOVE VT, one child going there now. With that said, you can do CS anywhere. CS is more about what you do outside of the classroom. It's easy to gain experience working on Open Source projects, thus creating your own portfolio.
Job searching (recruiting), food, culture/atmosphere, and campus at VT are outstanding. Students LOVE it there. But, as a high school senior, your DC needs to find the place that they love. If it's WM or UVA or GMU all are fine. Find your happy place!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is terrible for STEM, all of their STEM programs are sub-par and the CS program is especially weak. W&M is OK, the best option of the three is Tech. I would would highly consider GMU for CS, the name is not as flashy but the CS program is excellent.
So how are you judging UVA’s stem programs? They have an entire engineering school with tons of very sharp students. Pretty sure it’s not sub par. Most that I have spoken to that has a choice between Tech or UVA considers them roughly equal, maybe a slight nod to tech in engineering but certainly not a no brainer of a decision if is accepted to both.
So you are offended because you have a child at UVA in a STEM major (more than engineering in case you didn't know). Just look at the rankings, quality of faculty and research being conducted...weak.
I don’t have a kid there nor on engineering, just looking for a source.
Don't be lazy and do your own research.
I don’t care enough to do the research, I was hoping you’d have a source. You seem to spout this off a lot so just looking for a source for the OP.
Then STFU and stay out of the conversation.
How about you offer your sources?
How bout you look up what's already been said. Quality of professors, research being conducted and peer rankings. Look, I get it you don't seem too bright but pull up the ole Google machine and look up those topics. The whole "site your source" comeback is such a bore and quite lazy. Take those topics and look it up yourself sport.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is terrible for STEM, all of their STEM programs are sub-par and the CS program is especially weak. W&M is OK, the best option of the three is Tech. I would would highly consider GMU for CS, the name is not as flashy but the CS program is excellent.
So how are you judging UVA’s stem programs? They have an entire engineering school with tons of very sharp students. Pretty sure it’s not sub par. Most that I have spoken to that has a choice between Tech or UVA considers them roughly equal, maybe a slight nod to tech in engineering but certainly not a no brainer of a decision if is accepted to both.
So you are offended because you have a child at UVA in a STEM major (more than engineering in case you didn't know). Just look at the rankings, quality of faculty and research being conducted...weak.
I don’t have a kid there nor on engineering, just looking for a source.
Don't be lazy and do your own research.
I don’t care enough to do the research, I was hoping you’d have a source. You seem to spout this off a lot so just looking for a source for the OP.
Then STFU and stay out of the conversation.
How about you offer your sources?
How bout you look up what's already been said. Quality of professors, research being conducted and peer rankings. Look, I get it you don't seem too bright but pull up the ole Google machine and look up those topics. The whole "site your source" comeback is such a bore and quite lazy. Take those topics and look it up yourself sport.
Anonymous wrote:UVA is terrible for STEM, all of their STEM programs are sub-par and the CS program is especially weak. W&M is OK, the best option of the three is Tech. I would would highly consider GMU for CS, the name is not as flashy but the CS program is excellent.
Anonymous wrote:and as others have posted:
UVa is terrible in STEM.
VT recruiting for STEM is really good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is terrible for STEM, all of their STEM programs are sub-par and the CS program is especially weak. W&M is OK, the best option of the three is Tech. I would would highly consider GMU for CS, the name is not as flashy but the CS program is excellent.
So how are you judging UVA’s stem programs? They have an entire engineering school with tons of very sharp students. Pretty sure it’s not sub par. Most that I have spoken to that has a choice between Tech or UVA considers them roughly equal, maybe a slight nod to tech in engineering but certainly not a no brainer of a decision if is accepted to both.
So you are offended because you have a child at UVA in a STEM major (more than engineering in case you didn't know). Just look at the rankings, quality of faculty and research being conducted...weak.
USNWR has VT and UVA CS programs at 29.