Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's an amoral sack of shit.
Could you all please hyperventilate a little more?
I am enjoying it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
May not be articulate but no issue.
+1. He clearly states "there is no room for violence." Great if Nancy goes back to California, and permanently. A lot of us feel that way.
OP, you're trying to make something out of nothing, which only shows how desperate the Dems are now. Try again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
May not be articulate but no issue.
+1. He clearly states "there is no room for violence." Great if Nancy goes back to California, and permanently. A lot of us feel that way.
OP, you're trying to make something out of nothing, which only shows how desperate the Dems are now. Try again.
It's not nothing. Decent people don't combine condemnations of violence with political jokes. Why would anyone joke at all about someone who's spouse had just been attacked?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
May not be articulate but no issue.
+1. He clearly states "there is no room for violence." Great if Nancy goes back to California, and permanently. A lot of us feel that way.
OP, you're trying to make something out of nothing, which only shows how desperate the Dems are now. Try again.
It's not nothing. Decent people don't combine condemnations of violence with political jokes. Why would anyone joke at all about someone who's spouse had just been attacked?
Anonymous wrote:When Ted Cruz finds a classier way to respond to a situation, you know you are a loser.
Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
May not be articulate but no issue.
+1. He clearly states "there is no room for violence." Great if Nancy goes back to California, and permanently. A lot of us feel that way.
OP, you're trying to make something out of nothing, which only shows how desperate the Dems are now. Try again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
May not be articulate but no issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It also makes no sense - he’s saying if Vega wins this seat from Virginia, Pelosi loses her seat from California? That’s not how it works.
There is a line of thinking that should republicans win a large margin of house seats, Pelosi will retire early in 2023. Some also believe her daughter will then win her seat. I assume that’s what he was trying to say but it was not explained well.
Stop making excuses for an absolutely atrocious comment. What is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with what he said. He said it was wrong and then made a joke about sending her back to Cali. What is the issue?
“There’s no room for violence anywhere, but… “.
No “but”. Decency would have stopped him before “but”.