Anonymous wrote:MIT, UChicago, WashU, and Johns Hopkins are all D-3. It’s a hypothetical exercise but not sure why people keep tossing them out there.
(Uchicago, WashU, Emory, Case Western, and Carnegie Mellon are all in the same D3 athletics conference)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a purely academic, cultural, and quality standpoint, and not an athletic one (which, let's be honest, is the real relevance of the Ivy League), it's: Stanford, MIT, Duke, Chicago, Northwestern, and Johns Hopkins.
Let's not get into inane hypotheticals about DI vs DIII, or bring in lesser schools just for the sake of entertaining your own personal fantasy.
So, when you eliminate athletic considerations and personal fantasies, you might as well close the thread. Too much money in athletics to be ignored, but, if you do, this becomes an exercise in "inane hypotheticals".
Reality is that: Stanford wants to join the Big Ten and would receive no benefit whatsoever academically, culturally, or qualitatively from joining the Ivy League.
Reality is that: Northwestern is in the Big Ten and sitting pretty. Again, no benefit from Ivy League membership.
Reality is that: MIT, JHU, & Chicago could all benefit from Ivy League membership. And the Big Ten is not interested in any of these three schools, so feel free to send out the invitations.
But, I get your point and, if we agree to ignore reality, then you are right. And I mean this in a polite and respectful manner--not trying to be insincere or humorous in this final paragraph.
Without big time sports, Duke ceases to exist. Athletics is a main component of Duke's culture and identity.
MIT, Hopkins and Chicago's alumni would never go for the changes to admissions that would have to take place.
Anonymous wrote:Note to an above poster: The University of Chicago does have a football team that plays in a conference (possibly The Midwest Conference ?). Chicago plays Grinnell, Lake Forest, Knox, Concordia, and about 5 other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a purely academic, cultural, and quality standpoint, and not an athletic one (which, let's be honest, is the real relevance of the Ivy League), it's: Stanford, MIT, Duke, Chicago, Northwestern, and Johns Hopkins.
Let's not get into inane hypotheticals about DI vs DIII, or bring in lesser schools just for the sake of entertaining your own personal fantasy.
So, when you eliminate athletic considerations and personal fantasies, you might as well close the thread. Too much money in athletics to be ignored, but, if you do, this becomes an exercise in "inane hypotheticals".
Reality is that: Stanford wants to join the Big Ten and would receive no benefit whatsoever academically, culturally, or qualitatively from joining the Ivy League.
Reality is that: Northwestern is in the Big Ten and sitting pretty. Again, no benefit from Ivy League membership.
Reality is that: MIT, JHU, & Chicago could all benefit from Ivy League membership. And the Big Ten is not interested in any of these three schools, so feel free to send out the invitations.
But, I get your point and, if we agree to ignore reality, then you are right. And I mean this in a polite and respectful manner--not trying to be insincere or humorous in this final paragraph.
Without big time sports, Duke ceases to exist. Athletics is a main component of Duke's culture and identity.
Anonymous wrote:Stanford is not leaving the Pac12 and is a possible B1G candidate, so that is out. Northwestern isn't giving up a billion dollars in athletcs money for the Ivys.
I would agree with MIT, Hopkins and Georgetown.
Anonymous wrote:Instead of expanding, what about the possibility of shrinking…? Harvard’s football is decent and the school carries the league. If it moves to one of the power 5 conferences it could be competitive. Monday is always the driver.
Anonymous wrote:There is no reason for the Ivy League to expand.