Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a classification. This is where you find it:
https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/
I think we just need to keep interjecting the correct answer periodically until people get that it has nothing to do with geography or the word regional.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a classification. This is where you find it:
https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/
Anonymous wrote:I view it as reach. It is only known within the region where it exists. JMU, CNU, GMU in Virginia would be regional schools. They're known within a geographic sphere, not not particularly nationally. If you went to Los Angeles and said you have a degree from James Madison U., the person would think "where?" and they wouldn't know where it was.
This doesn't mean the school is bad, it just means it doesn't have a national or global name. But if you said "I went to the University of Virginia or Virginia Tech," the person in LA would think "Oh, I've heard of those."
Anonymous wrote:I view it as reach. It is only known within the region where it exists. JMU, CNU, GMU in Virginia would be regional schools. They're known within a geographic sphere, not not particularly nationally. If you went to Los Angeles and said you have a degree from James Madison U., the person would think "where?" and they wouldn't know where it was.
This doesn't mean the school is bad, it just means it doesn't have a national or global name. But if you said "I went to the University of Virginia or Virginia Tech," the person in LA would think "Oh, I've heard of those."
Anonymous wrote:I view it as reach. It is only known within the region where it exists. JMU, CNU, GMU in Virginia would be regional schools. They're known within a geographic sphere, not not particularly nationally. If you went to Los Angeles and said you have a degree from James Madison U., the person would think "where?" and they wouldn't know where it was.
This doesn't mean the school is bad, it just means it doesn't have a national or global name. But if you said "I went to the University of Virginia or Virginia Tech," the person in LA would think "Oh, I've heard of those."
Anonymous wrote:I view it as reach. It is only known within the region where it exists. JMU, CNU, GMU in Virginia would be regional schools. They're known within a geographic sphere, not not particularly nationally. If you went to Los Angeles and said you have a degree from James Madison U., the person would think "where?" and they wouldn't know where it was.
This doesn't mean the school is bad, it just means it doesn't have a national or global name. But if you said "I went to the University of Virginia or Virginia Tech," the person in LA would think "Oh, I've heard of those."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rankings and ranking classifications are based on academic offerings and quality, not the whereabouts of who attends. Regional schools do not have national or international academic recognition, thus they largely serve their local and nearby communities/states. That is, regional schools don’t have outstanding academics, thus they mostly attract regional students, not the other way around.
But weren't James Madison and Elon "regional universities" on USNWR just a few years back? Now I see they're both on the National Universities list. I really don't see how they changed that much if regional vs. national is really that big a distinction.
As another poster said, it probably just means they now attract students nationwide, rather than from a more localized area.
Anonymous wrote:As an example, Towson and UMBC seem like two schools that students might end up choosing between.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a consolation prize for universities that aren't very good. They get to be on a "list" even if it's not the "real" list. You're not a top national university or a top LAC but you are a top regional university. Yay!
No, it's not that. There are excellent schools on regional lists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rankings and ranking classifications are based on academic offerings and quality, not the whereabouts of who attends. Regional schools do not have national or international academic recognition, thus they largely serve their local and nearby communities/states. That is, regional schools don’t have outstanding academics, thus they mostly attract regional students, not the other way around.
But weren't James Madison and Elon "regional universities" on USNWR just a few years back? Now I see they're both on the National Universities list. I really don't see how they changed that much if regional vs. national is really that big a distinction.