"He never got to really feel peace."

Wow, that part was powerful. I have a narcissistic alcoholic in my life, and that is just so true. There's no peace in this person's life at all.

A lot of this podcast resonates with me.

Did anyone else’s Part 2 just cut off and end in the middle of them talking??

Oh my gosh, just listened to part 2. Those poor kids 😞

But the editing on this podcast is horrible- Natasha is crying talking about her daughter is finding Peter having a seizure, her having to rush over to the house to get the paramedics there, and then with no pause, Sarah breaks into a commercial saying “I’m so excited about this lady!” Poor poor choice.

Why did she divorce the baby daddy from rehab?

Can someone summarize?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a trend with interviews being more casual so the person feels comfortable- Bobby Bones is a pro at this. You really have to be skilled though to make it work. Sarah needs to practice this technique more and make an outline to help steer the conversation.

I think in this case Sarah was too close to the situation. So much of the interview was her story versus Natasha’s. Normally in a casual interview, the interviewer wouldn’t be talking about themselves so much.

Imo how it unfolded was fine. It came across more as two colleagues catching up on their lives.

She did this with the Dani interview as well.

Was the interview about Dani’s experience with Kane or something else?

My bad it was when Danni hosted Sarah. Yes, right after his death. It was a little hard to follow if you weren’t a watcher of the shower and didn’t know already some of the behind the scenes.

https://play.acast.com/s/help-a-human-out/ripdannistarr-feat.sarahfraser-

For me, the creepiest thing in part 1 was when Sarah said she finally went to HR about him and then they came back with a recording Kane had "accidentally" made of Sarah/Samy trash talking him in the studio...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a trend with interviews being more casual so the person feels comfortable- Bobby Bones is a pro at this. You really have to be skilled though to make it work. Sarah needs to practice this technique more and make an outline to help steer the conversation.

I think in this case Sarah was too close to the situation. So much of the interview was her story versus Natasha’s. Normally in a casual interview, the interviewer wouldn’t be talking about themselves so much.

Imo how it unfolded was fine. It came across more as two colleagues catching up on their lives.

She did this with the Dani interview as well.

Was the interview about Dani’s experience with Kane or something else?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a trend with interviews being more casual so the person feels comfortable- Bobby Bones is a pro at this. You really have to be skilled though to make it work. Sarah needs to practice this technique more and make an outline to help steer the conversation.

I think in this case Sarah was too close to the situation. So much of the interview was her story versus Natasha’s. Normally in a casual interview, the interviewer wouldn’t be talking about themselves so much.

Imo how it unfolded was fine. It came across more as two colleagues catching up on their lives.

She did this with the Dani interview as well.

Anonymous wrote:So far, she has given her point of view in a tasteful way without bashing Kane. She did a good jo explaining the situation from her point of view. It sounded hard for everyone involved. Best wishes for her and the girls.

I agree. It was presented in a very tasteful way. I respect that Natasha probably doesn't want to bash the father of her daughters.

Something about Sarah rubs me the wrong way and I don't know why.

So far, she has given her point of view in a tasteful way without bashing Kane. She did a good jo explaining the situation from her point of view. It sounded hard for everyone involved. Best wishes for her and the girls.

Anonymous wrote:One thing that confused me was she said they separated in 2012. But wasn’t it 2015 where he was on the air announcing their divorce? And she has posts between 2012-2015 on her blog that do not make it appear that they were separated?

I think she was mixing up years. At one point she said they started dating in 2019 and I think she meant 2000 when she was 19.

One thing that confused me was she said they separated in 2012. But wasn’t it 2015 where he was on the air announcing their divorce? And she has posts between 2012-2015 on her blog that do not make it appear that they were separated?

Anonymous wrote:There’s a trend with interviews being more casual so the person feels comfortable- Bobby Bones is a pro at this. You really have to be skilled though to make it work. Sarah needs to practice this technique more and make an outline to help steer the conversation.

I think in this case Sarah was too close to the situation. So much of the interview was her story versus Natasha’s. Normally in a casual interview, the interviewer wouldn’t be talking about themselves so much.

Imo how it unfolded was fine. It came across more as two colleagues catching up on their lives.

Anonymous wrote:is there a link? where were pics of Natasha/Kids? how old are the kids now?

This is the podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/930-natasha-elisa-part-1-marriage-and-divorce-to-kane/id1064651383?i=1000580632172

The pics of natasha/kids are on her insta:

Natasha Elisa (@mspinkmonster) • Instagram photos and videoshttps://www.instagram.com › mspinkmonster