Anonymous wrote:Just my 2 cents but I generally like TB bags. Agree that the shoes with the logo are dated.
I would never, ever say this anywhere but an anon message board, but TB bags don't seem nearly as try-hard as Neverfulls/St. Louis totes on the working NoVA moms I know. Like girl, I know you're stressing about paying for summer camp. Don't come around here with a 3k+ bag.
But I feel the same way about luxury cars driven by anyone but the legit rich. Just seems like advertising that you have no financial sense and are trying to show off. Enjoy parking that Range Rover in front of your split level, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not really about the logos though, is it. An average Kate Spade, Tory Burch or Coach logo on a bag is not bigger than the logo on a Chanel, Dior or Prada bag.
Some people just find 'entry level luxury' trashy, like it's so 'gaudy' to spend $300 on a bag instead of $3000.
OP, why do you care about such a person's opinion?
But therein lies the circular flawed logic in justifying these bags. Why do you like THIS $300 bag more than the zillions of similarly priced bags without logos, or the similar quality/asthetic bags that are half the price without logos? Presumably, something about the idea of the Tory Burch brand appeals to you. So for those who say "who cares what others say, just buy the bag you like" - are failing to acknowledge that a big part of the psychology that people "like" these bags is because of the brand, and what that brand conveys to others.
So yes, of course buy what you like. But if what you like is TB, you probably care about the message your bag is sending to others - in which case, the message it is sending is entry level mall shopper.
I say all this as someone who has expensive purses and i have a lot of money to buy whatever I want, but my favorite brand is Hobo - because i genuinely like the asthetic and function, and the quality is phenomenal (last for years) - but no one recognizes the brand or probably thinks anything about my purses because they are non descript.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How old was the person who told you that?
Some people in the DMV think Coach and Tory Burch isn't high brow enough, because so many people wear it/can afford it.
Late 50s but they are very much styled like Meryl Streep in the Devil Wears Prada. Wears a cape in the fall/winter, patent high heels, etc.. we are colleagues. I am 36 fwiw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not really about the logos though, is it. An average Kate Spade, Tory Burch or Coach logo on a bag is not bigger than the logo on a Chanel, Dior or Prada bag.
Some people just find 'entry level luxury' trashy, like it's so 'gaudy' to spend $300 on a bag instead of $3000.
OP, why do you care about such a person's opinion?
Op here. Between my weight and race, people tend to make assumptions based on how I am dressed. As I’ve gotten older I’ve come to learn from others who have guided me about what to wear and what not to wear. Thus, it’s important that I know how items come across and if I’ll be perceived a certain way for wearing something.
Anonymous wrote:But therein lies the circular flawed logic in justifying these bags. Why do you like THIS $300 bag more than the zillions of similarly priced bags without logos, or the similar quality/asthetic bags that are half the price without logos? Presumably, something about the idea of the Tory Burch brand appeals to you. So for those who say "who cares what others say, just buy the bag you like" - are failing to acknowledge that a big part of the psychology that people "like" these bags is because of the brand, and what that brand conveys to others.
Anonymous wrote:It's not really about the logos though, is it. An average Kate Spade, Tory Burch or Coach logo on a bag is not bigger than the logo on a Chanel, Dior or Prada bag.
Some people just find 'entry level luxury' trashy, like it's so 'gaudy' to spend $300 on a bag instead of $3000.
OP, why do you care about such a person's opinion?
Anonymous wrote:It's not really about the logos though, is it. An average Kate Spade, Tory Burch or Coach logo on a bag is not bigger than the logo on a Chanel, Dior or Prada bag.
Some people just find 'entry level luxury' trashy, like it's so 'gaudy' to spend $300 on a bag instead of $3000.
OP, why do you care about such a person's opinion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For lower end purses my take on hierarchy from lowest up is:
Coach
Kate Spade
Michael Kors
Tory Burch
Marc Jacobs
Coach has the best quality leather though of this group. Especially the rambler.
I agree. And vintage Coach is even better
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For lower end purses my take on hierarchy from lowest up is:
Coach
Kate Spade
Michael Kors
Tory Burch
Marc Jacobs
Coach has the best quality leather though of this group. Especially the rambler.