Anonymous wrote:There is no such thing as a “feeder” undergrad for T14 law schools. The list is backwards in implied causation. The listed colleges send a lot to the top law schools because a lot of undergrads who want to go to top law school go to those colleges. Not a lot of pre-law folks are going to Rose Hulman or RPI. But if an RPI student wanted to go to T14 and achieved the GPA and LSAT to do it, they would be at absolutely no disadvantage compared to a T20 undergrad with similar credentials. If anything, it might actually help. I’m a lawyer and one of my mentors from when I was a youngster is dean of admissions at a law school, and this is what I’ve been told. We stay in touch because they want me to hire their grads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t really matter where you to go to college for the top law schools, grades and lsat scores are all they care about. The top law schools accept students for a wide range of schools.
Correct
If that is the case why are the number of students in the T14 from Ivy League and similar undergraduate schools (inclusive of certain SLACs). Riddle me this? I went to a top 60 undergrad and top 50 law school and made it to big firms but eventually left.
As a PP explained, there's a confounding extrinsic variable: students who get into the top undergraduate schools tend to have high GPAs and standardized test scores. These same students are likely to have high undergraduate GPAs and standardized test scores. In other words, the students who are most likely to get into the top law schools are the same students who are most likely to get into the top undergraduate programs.
This poster is exactly right. Put simply, kids who go to top undergraduate schools tend to be very smart and those of them who apply to law schools tend to be very smart. But not all of them get in to T-14 schools. The undergraduate school with the highest average LSAT scores last year was Yale with 167.5. Many top tier undergraduate schools had averages of 165 or below. While a 168 is in the 96th percentile of an already very selective cohort, it is probably not going to get you into a T-14 law school unless you are URM. In the end, where an applicant went to undergraduate school is far less important than grades and LSAT scores. Finally, as others have said, graduating from a T-14 school is not necessary for success in the field of law by any means, nor does it guarantee success.
An undergrad's average LSAT is irrelevant, not predictive or in any way connected with how a particular student will score on the LSAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I was a college student who wanted to go to law school, I'd probably spend 4 years prepping for the LSAT and taking the easiest STEM degree possible while trying to minimize undergrad cost as much as possible. Don't study Poli Sci or Econ or Psych.
In fact, if you went to somewhere like U-MT Missoula, it would probably be a boon to T14 application. Geographic diversity is a thing, but you need to graduate near the top and have a ridiculous LSAT (173+). If you've been drilling the LSAT for 4 years, you should have a high score.
This is excellent advice. I graduated from a top 3 law school and went to a very run of the mill state school for undergrad. If you have a decent GPA, a 98-99% LSAT score will give you many options. A top GPA and top LSAT score will get you in anywhere. Just make sure you can keep up with the workload once you get there if you took the easiest STEM degree at a mediocre college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t really matter where you to go to college for the top law schools, grades and lsat scores are all they care about. The top law schools accept students for a wide range of schools.
Correct
If that is the case why are the number of students in the T14 from Ivy League and similar undergraduate schools (inclusive of certain SLACs). Riddle me this? I went to a top 60 undergrad and top 50 law school and made it to big firms but eventually left.
As a PP explained, there's a confounding extrinsic variable: students who get into the top undergraduate schools tend to have high GPAs and standardized test scores. These same students are likely to have high undergraduate GPAs and standardized test scores. In other words, the students who are most likely to get into the top law schools are the same students who are most likely to get into the top undergraduate programs.
This poster is exactly right. Put simply, kids who go to top undergraduate schools tend to be very smart and those of them who apply to law schools tend to be very smart. But not all of them get in to T-14 schools. The undergraduate school with the highest average LSAT scores last year was Yale with 167.5. Many top tier undergraduate schools had averages of 165 or below. While a 168 is in the 96th percentile of an already very selective cohort, it is probably not going to get you into a T-14 law school unless you are URM. In the end, where an applicant went to undergraduate school is far less important than grades and LSAT scores. Finally, as others have said, graduating from a T-14 school is not necessary for success in the field of law by any means, nor does it guarantee success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I was a college student who wanted to go to law school, I'd probably spend 4 years prepping for the LSAT and taking the easiest STEM degree possible while trying to minimize undergrad cost as much as possible. Don't study Poli Sci or Econ or Psych.
In fact, if you went to somewhere like U-MT Missoula, it would probably be a boon to T14 application. Geographic diversity is a thing, but you need to graduate near the top and have a ridiculous LSAT (173+). If you've been drilling the LSAT for 4 years, you should have a high score.
This is excellent advice. I graduated from a top 3 law school and went to a very run of the mill state school for undergrad. If you have a decent GPA, a 98-99% LSAT score will give you many options. A top GPA and top LSAT score will get you in anywhere. Just make sure you can keep up with the workload once you get there if you took the easiest STEM degree at a mediocre college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t really matter where you to go to college for the top law schools, grades and lsat scores are all they care about. The top law schools accept students for a wide range of schools.
Correct
If that is the case why are the number of students in the T14 from Ivy League and similar undergraduate schools (inclusive of certain SLACs). Riddle me this? I went to a top 60 undergrad and top 50 law school and made it to big firms but eventually left.
As a PP explained, there's a confounding extrinsic variable: students who get into the top undergraduate schools tend to have high GPAs and standardized test scores. These same students are likely to have high undergraduate GPAs and standardized test scores. In other words, the students who are most likely to get into the top law schools are the same students who are most likely to get into the top undergraduate programs.
This poster is exactly right. Put simply, kids who go to top undergraduate schools tend to be very smart and those of them who apply to law schools tend to be very smart. But not all of them get in to T-14 schools. The undergraduate school with the highest average LSAT scores last year was Yale with 167.5. Many top tier undergraduate schools had averages of 165 or below. While a 168 is in the 96th percentile of an already very selective cohort, it is probably not going to get you into a T-14 law school unless you are URM. In the end, where an applicant went to undergraduate school is far less important than grades and LSAT scores. Finally, as others have said, graduating from a T-14 school is not necessary for success in the field of law by any means, nor does it guarantee success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t really matter where you to go to college for the top law schools, grades and lsat scores are all they care about. The top law schools accept students for a wide range of schools.
Correct
If that is the case why are the number of students in the T14 from Ivy League and similar undergraduate schools (inclusive of certain SLACs). Riddle me this? I went to a top 60 undergrad and top 50 law school and made it to big firms but eventually left.
As a PP explained, there's a confounding extrinsic variable: students who get into the top undergraduate schools tend to have high GPAs and standardized test scores. These same students are likely to have high undergraduate GPAs and standardized test scores. In other words, the students who are most likely to get into the top law schools are the same students who are most likely to get into the top undergraduate programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t really matter where you to go to college for the top law schools, grades and lsat scores are all they care about. The top law schools accept students for a wide range of schools.
It also isn't surprising that undergraduate institutions that select for high standardized test scores would have more students who do well on standardized tests.
It will be interesting to see if that changes over time now that the top undergraduate schools have a significant % of the student body that were admitted test optional.
Bowdoin has been test optional for a long time and its median SAT scores are lower than comparable SLACs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t really matter where you to go to college for the top law schools, grades and lsat scores are all they care about. The top law schools accept students for a wide range of schools.
It also isn't surprising that undergraduate institutions that select for high standardized test scores would have more students who do well on standardized tests.
It will be interesting to see if that changes over time now that the top undergraduate schools have a significant % of the student body that were admitted test optional.
Anonymous wrote:If I was a college student who wanted to go to law school, I'd probably spend 4 years prepping for the LSAT and taking the easiest STEM degree possible while trying to minimize undergrad cost as much as possible. Don't study Poli Sci or Econ or Psych.
In fact, if you went to somewhere like U-MT Missoula, it would probably be a boon to T14 application. Geographic diversity is a thing, but you need to graduate near the top and have a ridiculous LSAT (173+). If you've been drilling the LSAT for 4 years, you should have a high score.