Anonymous wrote:Wait… are you telling me that a woman who struggled with mental health issues has her dysfunctional family arguing over her estate. Unbelievable! Just kidding. This is absolutely the way it would play out. You know it.

I really don't understand how and why Anne Heche was allowed to be out and about and driving. It's like the woman who blew through an intersection at 130 mph who had a history of significant mental health issues. How do they get a driver's license?

No way should her ex-husband be the executor. Furthermore, that emailed will is vague and could’ve been produced under duress since they were living together in dating at the time.

Wait… are you telling me that a woman who struggled with mental health issues has her dysfunctional family arguing over her estate. Unbelievable! Just kidding. This is absolutely the way it would play out. You know it.

I hope the woman who rented the house AH crased into gets a lot. She lost a lot of her possessions as well as a reasonably priced place to live in a normally expensive area.

This is sad. Hope the 13 year old has good family support, sucks to lose your mom in such a horrifying way and then confirm that your half brother (apparently) wants nothing to do with you.

Wasnt she estranged from her family too? Would be nice if these boys had a grandma/aunts/uncles who could step in and help too.

No one forced him to change the locks. He’s an a-hole.

Anonymous wrote:How spectacularly cruel that the older brother has locked the child out of his own home. And now that he’s describing it as “vacant”, it sounds like he has removed everything without anyone consent. That poor kid, to loose his mom and his home all at once. (I mean I know not literally poor)

*lose

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the poor child has lost his mother, and he can’t go in and grab his clothes, his favorite blanket and his Xbox or whatever? Come on, this is absurd. When my mom died (with no will) no one was remotely concerned with people removing random non valuable objects from her home. Literally no one.

Who made sure valuable items weren't "mixed up" with the non-valuable items?

No one cared. The older brother has access to the house. If he’s so worried, he can supervise the poor kid who just wants his stuff. He’s not trying to steal a Van Gogh off the wall for gods sake.

Does he? The locks were changed and you know for a fact that the older brother has the key? These are all allegations. You have no idea nor do I. The court is going through the normal process. Mr. Tupper just doesn't like it and is complaining.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the poor child has lost his mother, and he can’t go in and grab his clothes, his favorite blanket and his Xbox or whatever? Come on, this is absurd. When my mom died (with no will) no one was remotely concerned with people removing random non valuable objects from her home. Literally no one.

Who made sure valuable items weren't "mixed up" with the non-valuable items?

No one cared. The older brother has access to the house. If he’s so worried, he can supervise the poor kid who just wants his stuff. He’s not trying to steal a Van Gogh off the wall for gods sake.

Apparently someone cares in this case.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Insane that the court would even consider appointing her 20 year old deadbeat son the administrator. It should be a neutral party.

"Deadbeat?" He's 20! As DCUMers so often point out, "his brain isn't fully formed yet!" He didn't ask for this.

He didn't ask to drop out of college and not work at all?

His mom had mental issues and he might too. 20 is still young enough not to be labeled a deadbeat.

Says the parent of another deadbeat. Only rich 20 year olds have this choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Insane that the court would even consider appointing her 20 year old deadbeat son the administrator. It should be a neutral party.

"Deadbeat?" He's 20! As DCUMers so often point out, "his brain isn't fully formed yet!" He didn't ask for this.

He didn't ask to drop out of college and not work at all?

His mom had mental issues and he might too. 20 is still young enough not to be labeled a deadbeat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the poor child has lost his mother, and he can’t go in and grab his clothes, his favorite blanket and his Xbox or whatever? Come on, this is absurd. When my mom died (with no will) no one was remotely concerned with people removing random non valuable objects from her home. Literally no one.

Who made sure valuable items weren't "mixed up" with the non-valuable items?

No one cared. The older brother has access to the house. If he’s so worried, he can supervise the poor kid who just wants his stuff. He’s not trying to steal a Van Gogh off the wall for gods sake.

Anonymous wrote:So the poor child has lost his mother, and he can’t go in and grab his clothes, his favorite blanket and his Xbox or whatever? Come on, this is absurd. When my mom died (with no will) no one was remotely concerned with people removing random non valuable objects from her home. Literally no one.

Who made sure valuable items weren't "mixed up" with the non-valuable items?

So the poor child has lost his mother, and he can’t go in and grab his clothes, his favorite blanket and his Xbox or whatever? Come on, this is absurd. When my mom died (with no will) no one was remotely concerned with people removing random non valuable objects from her home. Literally no one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Insane that the court would even consider appointing her 20 year old deadbeat son the administrator. It should be a neutral party.

"Deadbeat?" He's 20! As DCUMers so often point out, "his brain isn't fully formed yet!" He didn't ask for this.

+1 He hasn't murdered, mugged, raped or carjacked anyone either.

He wants to not go to school but also not work. And he won’t give his half brother the kid’s own belongings from the mother’s house. He also sounds non-responsive. Not seeing many redeeming qualities here.

Can a minor own property in California? Legally, the house and the contents of the house belong to the estate. Yes, he's probably being an ass but it's likely legal.

Also a good point. The executor (when they are eventually named) will probably let the kid take his clothes etc, but anything of value belongs to the estate.