Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. After writing my post I went and tried the Vanguard calculator and my estimate became less than half š, probably without SS. I was using the calculator that comes with the investment company from work, Voya, which didnāt have me input any number, so not sure what wild assumptions they made š
I get I may need to reconsider my financial picture after using other calculator and thinking about current and future priorities. The reason I think I am in good shape for now is that we are south European expat and will probably retire back there, where even a 2k monthly pension is considered not bad. We would have that already from SS.. Am I missing something? Things may get more complicated and expensive if children stay here and we have to travel back and forth..
OP - one calculator is using today's dollars, another is using future dollars.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. After writing my post I went and tried the Vanguard calculator and my estimate became less than half š, probably without SS. I was using the calculator that comes with the investment company from work, Voya, which didnāt have me input any number, so not sure what wild assumptions they made š
I get I may need to reconsider my financial picture after using other calculator and thinking about current and future priorities. The reason I think I am in good shape for now is that we are south European expat and will probably retire back there, where even a 2k monthly pension is considered not bad. We would have that already from SS.. Am I missing something? Things may get more complicated and expensive if children stay here and we have to travel back and forth..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question from another poster here: I have a business and solo 401k. My gross annual income before write offs is 350K, net after tax and depreciation write offs is around 180K. Someone said that tax advisors recommend 10-15% of your income deferred for 401k. Shall I save 10% from 350K or 10% from 180K/net income?
It all depends on what other investment funds you will have available to you.
But personally, I would do $35K because you can.
Anonymous wrote:A question from another poster here: I have a business and solo 401k. My gross annual income before write offs is 350K, net after tax and depreciation write offs is around 180K. Someone said that tax advisors recommend 10-15% of your income deferred for 401k. Shall I save 10% from 350K or 10% from 180K/net income?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am in my mid-40 and currently save 10% of my salary towards 401k. My salary is 120k and have ~500k so far. I know these are small numbers compared to what most people post on this board but not bad realistically!
When I run a retirement calculator, it seems like I am on track for retirement and, including SS, I will have around 9k in monthly income. That sounds good to me. I donāt know how accurate the calculator I used is but, supposed it is, if I am on track, why would I want to max out my retirement savings? to have more money when I am old?
I have 2 children, but somehow the thought of a bigger inheritance to them doesnāt feel like a great motivation. I would rather enjoy my time with them now than passing them on money after I am dead! My husband also has his own fund with approximately the same balance and contribution.
Curious the numbers you used to get to 9k income. If you retire at 62, you'll get maybe 2500 in SS pretax. To get to 9k monthly, (and this is still pretax), you would need to have 2.6m in your 401k to get the remainder (6500) from four 401k. You aren't getting to 2.6 in 20 years if you are currently at 500k.
OP can get to $2.4M, assuming a 3% yearly raise and 6% average returns for 20 years. The issue is that gets you $8K in future dollars, which is more like $5K in todayās dollars.
Also what formula are you using to get only $6500/month from $2.6M?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am in my mid-40 and currently save 10% of my salary towards 401k. My salary is 120k and have ~500k so far. I know these are small numbers compared to what most people post on this board but not bad realistically!
When I run a retirement calculator, it seems like I am on track for retirement and, including SS, I will have around 9k in monthly income. That sounds good to me. I donāt know how accurate the calculator I used is but, supposed it is, if I am on track, why would I want to max out my retirement savings? to have more money when I am old?
I have 2 children, but somehow the thought of a bigger inheritance to them doesnāt feel like a great motivation. I would rather enjoy my time with them now than passing them on money after I am dead! My husband also has his own fund with approximately the same balance and contribution.
Curious the numbers you used to get to 9k income. If you retire at 62, you'll get maybe 2500 in SS pretax. To get to 9k monthly, (and this is still pretax), you would need to have 2.6m in your 401k to get the remainder (6500) from four 401k. You aren't getting to 2.6 in 20 years if you are currently at 500k.
Anonymous wrote:It has not been easy to save for retirement and college, with a SAHM and with maintaining a life style which includes travel, tutors, outsourcing etc.
My kids got generous merit scholarship in state schools and so they now have some seed money from what we did not spend on college.
We are still cautious about money, even though we don't stop living in today. You can do both, make good financial decisions as well as have fun in the present. It is not one or the other.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. After writing my post I went and tried the Vanguard calculator and my estimate became less than half š, probably without SS. I was using the calculator that comes with the investment company from work, Voya, which didnāt have me input any number, so not sure what wild assumptions they made š
I get I may need to reconsider my financial picture after using other calculator and thinking about current and future priorities. The reason I think I am in good shape for now is that we are south European expat and will probably retire back there, where even a 2k monthly pension is considered not bad. We would have that already from SS.. Am I missing something? Things may get more complicated and expensive if children stay here and we have to travel back and forth..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why you are maxing out. I'd do up to the match and enjoy the rest. I can also live nicely on $4k a month. Not sure why you need twice that.
4k a month? Assuming your house is paid off, that's still cutting it pretty close IMO. 1k food, 1k in property taxes and insurance, 1k healthcare.
The tricky part is figuring that out in future dollars. I'm not OP, but we live on 6k including day care bill and mortgage. 4k would be more than enough without those. But we don't know how much food will cost in 25 years, for example.