Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The colleges listed are at the top because they get first pick of high school students who are most likely to be successful, not because of anything the colleges did differently than colleges that are a bit less selective.
I agree. I'd also like to know how many of these people were legacy or had connections to the schools and/or employers. I think it would be interesting to pull those people out of the data and then see how the schools do. Otherwise, it just seems like the same old same old.
Anonymous wrote:The colleges listed are at the top because they get first pick of high school students who are most likely to be successful, not because of anything the colleges did differently than colleges that are a bit less selective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Per capita lists are BS.
They allow schools of different sizes to be compared. Very useful.
You’ll notice that almost no public universities are listed. That in itself is a red flag.
Anonymous wrote:Most of the top private schools don’t offer the depth and breadth of the top publics. There are thousand of enrolled students who have a absolutely no interest in any of these areas mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Per capita lists are BS.
They allow schools of different sizes to be compared. Very useful.
Anonymous wrote:Per capita lists are BS.
Anonymous wrote:With the overall school ranking, these were the secondary reference we used for picking a school list
Anonymous wrote:Per capita lists are BS.
Anonymous wrote:Per capita lists are BS.