Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Test blind is so much better than test optional. It's fair to everyone.
Except the kids with high gpas and test scores. The fewer data points, the more arbitrary the decision making, especially in the age of Covid inflated grades.
It’s not arbitrary. People can claim grades are inflated but high schools can send a lot of information about their student population that provide additional context to GPAs. Schools can’t get that with test scores, and they know that. They don’t know if the high score is a result of a one time test or hours of practice with a private tutor and multiple rounds of testing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is what Grinnell says about this, just to use one example of a competitive school that I’m familiar with. I don’t think it’s too hard to read between the lines.
If you think your scores are an accurate representation of your ability, then you should feel free to submit them. If you feel they are not, then don’t submit them.
If you get the score you hoped for, and especially if it’s above average for Grinnell, submitting the score may help you in the admission process.
Keep in mind that we consider your test score in context. Even if your score is not above average for Grinnell, but it is for your high school or neighborhood, your score may help you in the admission process.
A high SAT or ACT score can offset a low GPA. If you don’t submit a score, we have less information about your academic performance. If you have a low GPA but do well on the SAT or ACT, your test score can be an important indicator of your potential to succeed in college-level classes.
The way I read the Grinnell statement, (1) if you don’t submit test scores as a non-URM in a good high school, Grinnell will assume you didn’t score consistent with with grades or above Grinnell’s average and (2) if you’re an URM at a low performing school but your own scores are good for that school, submit them even if they’re not great for Grinnell because Grinnell will take them in context and they could help you.
In other words, if you’re not an URM and you attend a good high school, don’t submit test scores at your peril.
This sounds right. Drop the mic.
Anonymous wrote:I’m curious as to what the collective here thinks is happening at TO admissions offices. We applied to 7 schools last year and all were TO. All of these schools said something to this effect: you may submit test scores but they will not be considered during admissions evaluation.
I take this as meaning the admissions committee (for lack of a better term) does not see any scores. I wonder if the committee knows whether or not scores were submitted at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Test blind is so much better than test optional. It's fair to everyone.
Except the kids with high gpas and test scores. The fewer data points, the more arbitrary the decision making, especially in the age of Covid inflated grades.
It’s not arbitrary. People can claim grades are inflated but high schools can send a lot of information about their student population that provide additional context to GPAs. Schools can’t get that with test scores, and they know that. They don’t know if the high score is a result of a one time test or hours of practice with a private tutor and multiple rounds of testing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Test blind is so much better than test optional. It's fair to everyone.
Except the kids with high gpas and test scores. The fewer data points, the more arbitrary the decision making, especially in the age of Covid inflated grades.
Anonymous wrote:Test blind is so much better than test optional. It's fair to everyone.
Anonymous wrote:i would be careful following college vine guidance PP - given the likely direction of the pending affirmative action case currently at SCOTUS level most elite colleges already taking action to avoid scrutiny on any biases going forward - the pendulum may wind up swinging waaay to far the other in the other direction unfortunately
Anonymous wrote:For schools that now have averages that are very high due to TO policies, the schools can’t assume you have bad scores if you don’t submit. The TO applicant could have an 1190 but he could also have a 1430 and the 75% is a 1490 so he didn’t submit.
Anonymous wrote:My kid’s test prep tutor (who also does college counseling) says test optional is real for everyone. As others have said, if you don’t submit test scores, everything else becomes more important.
Anonymous wrote:This is what Grinnell says about this, just to use one example of a competitive school that I’m familiar with. I don’t think it’s too hard to read between the lines.
If you think your scores are an accurate representation of your ability, then you should feel free to submit them. If you feel they are not, then don’t submit them.
If you get the score you hoped for, and especially if it’s above average for Grinnell, submitting the score may help you in the admission process.
Keep in mind that we consider your test score in context. Even if your score is not above average for Grinnell, but it is for your high school or neighborhood, your score may help you in the admission process.
A high SAT or ACT score can offset a low GPA. If you don’t submit a score, we have less information about your academic performance. If you have a low GPA but do well on the SAT or ACT, your test score can be an important indicator of your potential to succeed in college-level classes.