Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's up with this garbage about lyles crouchs traditional model that someone writes in every discussion. The reason that the school preforms so high is because there in NO diversity. It is a neighborhood school filled with children who live in million dollar homes in Old Town. That's the secret to the school's success. Rich children with involved families = good scores. It has nothing to do with thier traditional model or curriculum.
By your logic and definition of diversity, George Mason and Brooks should be "high performing" schools. Their diversity numbers are about the same as L-C and they have involved parents. But their proficiency numbers don't come close to L-C and are abysmal.
You may want to ask yourself why you find it so hard to accept that a different curriculum might be better than what is in place at the other schools.
Anonymous wrote:What's up with this garbage about lyles crouchs traditional model that someone writes in every discussion. The reason that the school preforms so high is because there in NO diversity. It is a neighborhood school filled with children who live in million dollar homes in Old Town. That's the secret to the school's success. Rich children with involved families = good scores. It has nothing to do with thier traditional model or curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:What's up with this garbage about lyles crouchs traditional model that someone writes in every discussion. The reason that the school preforms so high is because there in NO diversity. It is a neighborhood school filled with children who live in million dollar homes in Old Town. That's the secret to the school's success. Rich children with involved families = good scores. It has nothing to do with thier traditional model or curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:What's up with this garbage about lyles crouchs traditional model that someone writes in every discussion. The reason that the school preforms so high is because there in NO diversity. It is a neighborhood school filled with children who live in million dollar homes in Old Town. That's the secret to the school's success. Rich children with involved families = good scores. It has nothing to do with thier traditional model or curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:What's up with this garbage about lyles crouchs traditional model that someone writes in every discussion. The reason that the school preforms so high is because there in NO diversity. It is a neighborhood school filled with children who live in million dollar homes in Old Town. That's the secret to the school's success. Rich children with involved families = good scores. It has nothing to do with thier traditional model or curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, not interested in moving. Our jobs are both DC based. We are not interested in private schools and I am not sure why that is always the "solution".
Bless your heart.
It's the solution because there is no alternative. Alexandrians would rather pretend the schools are good, than demand that the schools actually be good. Then it doesn't make their cocktail parties and scholarship fundraisers awkward.
I banged my head against the ACPS wall for years. Nothing changes. Save yourself the frustration and the trouble of your neighbors vilifying you and insulting responses from School Board members (if you get any response).
Stay but know that you'll have to teach the fundamentals at home or leave and get a proper education for your kid(s).
I am PP you're replying to, and I agree 100% with what you said. I said bless your heart to the OP who thinks no one moves or that no one should go private. We were in Jeff Houston, then moved to Brooks/Maury and now are in private. I don't know anyone who sends their kids to Brooks anymore it's gone way downhill. My kids are now in HS. But I remember getting all that grief for going private, from certain ACPS cheerleaders and can do no wrong holier than thou people (including those who pushed for the lights at ACHS, which I agree is a good thing), and now those people even send their kids to private. How the mighty have fallen.
I've lived in Alexandria since the 90s, nothing has gotten better. People either move to Fairfax, Arlington, or out of state. They just do. I wish it wasn't the case.
Wow, if you sent your kids to Jeff Houston then you were really committed to public schools regardless of a school's rank. Very interesting to me how Alexandria could utilize these parents to create a world class school district but instead take the whole system in a.... completely different direction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, not interested in moving. Our jobs are both DC based. We are not interested in private schools and I am not sure why that is always the "solution".
Bless your heart.
It's the solution because there is no alternative. Alexandrians would rather pretend the schools are good, than demand that the schools actually be good. Then it doesn't make their cocktail parties and scholarship fundraisers awkward.
I banged my head against the ACPS wall for years. Nothing changes. Save yourself the frustration and the trouble of your neighbors vilifying you and insulting responses from School Board members (if you get any response).
Stay but know that you'll have to teach the fundamentals at home or leave and get a proper education for your kid(s).
I am PP you're replying to, and I agree 100% with what you said. I said bless your heart to the OP who thinks no one moves or that no one should go private. We were in Jeff Houston, then moved to Brooks/Maury and now are in private. I don't know anyone who sends their kids to Brooks anymore it's gone way downhill. My kids are now in HS. But I remember getting all that grief for going private, from certain ACPS cheerleaders and can do no wrong holier than thou people (including those who pushed for the lights at ACHS, which I agree is a good thing), and now those people even send their kids to private. How the mighty have fallen.
I've lived in Alexandria since the 90s, nothing has gotten better. People either move to Fairfax, Arlington, or out of state. They just do. I wish it wasn't the case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, not interested in moving. Our jobs are both DC based. We are not interested in private schools and I am not sure why that is always the "solution".
Bless your heart.
It's the solution because there is no alternative. Alexandrians would rather pretend the schools are good, than demand that the schools actually be good. Then it doesn't make their cocktail parties and scholarship fundraisers awkward.
I banged my head against the ACPS wall for years. Nothing changes. Save yourself the frustration and the trouble of your neighbors vilifying you and insulting responses from School Board members (if you get any response).
Stay but know that you'll have to teach the fundamentals at home or leave and get a proper education for your kid(s).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, not interested in moving. Our jobs are both DC based. We are not interested in private schools and I am not sure why that is always the "solution".
Bless your heart.
It's the solution because there is no alternative. Alexandrians would rather pretend the schools are good, than demand that the schools actually be good. Then it doesn't make their cocktail parties and scholarship fundraisers awkward.
I banged my head against the ACPS wall for years. Nothing changes. Save yourself the frustration and the trouble of your neighbors vilifying you and insulting responses from School Board members (if you get any response).
Stay but know that you'll have to teach the fundamentals at home or leave and get a proper education for your kid(s).
I have two recent TC grads. One went to UVA and one went to UNC Chapel Hill. All my frinds who went to private schools went to way lesser schools and spent 160k per kid gettng them there. Yikes. Some people just aren't good at making decisions.
Huh. We send our children to private schools because we have the money to do it. You don't. Oh well. Spending the tuition money doesn't mean that we aren't making a good decision. In fact, your post validates our choice. Yikes right back atcha, sweetie.![]()
DP
P.S. Your math is incorrect. It is +$50,000 per year per child for 13 years.
Tell your kid to have fun at Elon!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has devolved into useless shouting match.
Some ACPS testing info:
(1) 38% of disadvantaged students scored at the 40th percentile (nationally) or more on MAP language arts assessment (MAP is a test that aligns with the Common Core, and it covers more ground in that it measures more than what is covered on the SOL, which is grade specific. The MAP growth statistic is not one I understand although it is the number that ACPS seems to care more about).
(2) 80% of non-disadvantaged students meet the above criteria.
(3) 31% of disadvantaged students scored 40th percentile (nationally) or more on the MAP math assessment.
(4) 72% of non-disadvantaged students meet the above criteria.
I don't know how this compares to other school districts but something tells me that the percentage of non-disadvantaged students meeting the 40th percentile on the MAP math assessment could be higher. The percentage of disadvantaged students needs to be significantly higher and the district is certainly failing them.
Change for the better will be slow coming in the district. I don't count on any of it making a difference during the course of my children's tenure in the district. For many families, moving is a realistic option. What families need are realistic strategies for helping their students in their early elementary years - concrete advice on how to access inexpensive supplementation at home. It should be okay to direct, even encourage kids to watch certain YouTube series and play on free educational apps.
PP - I meant to say:
For many families, moving is NOT a realistic option.
Anonymous wrote:This thread has devolved into useless shouting match.
Some ACPS testing info:
(1) 38% of disadvantaged students scored at the 40th percentile (nationally) or more on MAP language arts assessment (MAP is a test that aligns with the Common Core, and it covers more ground in that it measures more than what is covered on the SOL, which is grade specific. The MAP growth statistic is not one I understand although it is the number that ACPS seems to care more about).
(2) 80% of non-disadvantaged students meet the above criteria.
(3) 31% of disadvantaged students scored 40th percentile (nationally) or more on the MAP math assessment.
(4) 72% of non-disadvantaged students meet the above criteria.
I don't know how this compares to other school districts but something tells me that the percentage of non-disadvantaged students meeting the 40th percentile on the MAP math assessment could be higher. The percentage of disadvantaged students needs to be significantly higher and the district is certainly failing them.
Change for the better will be slow coming in the district. I don't count on any of it making a difference during the course of my children's tenure in the district. For many families, moving is a realistic option. What families need are realistic strategies for helping their students in their early elementary years - concrete advice on how to access inexpensive supplementation at home. It should be okay to direct, even encourage kids to watch certain YouTube series and play on free educational apps.
Anonymous wrote:This thread has devolved into useless shouting match.
Some ACPS testing info:
(1) 38% of disadvantaged students scored at the 40th percentile (nationally) or more on MAP language arts assessment (MAP is a test that aligns with the Common Core, and it covers more ground in that it measures more than what is covered on the SOL, which is grade specific. The MAP growth statistic is not one I understand although it is the number that ACPS seems to care more about).
(2) 80% of non-disadvantaged students meet the above criteria.
(3) 31% of disadvantaged students scored 40th percentile (nationally) or more on the MAP math assessment.
(4) 72% of non-disadvantaged students meet the above criteria.
I don't know how this compares to other school districts but something tells me that the percentage of non-disadvantaged students meeting the 40th percentile on the MAP math assessment could be higher. The percentage of disadvantaged students needs to be significantly higher and the district is certainly failing them.
Change for the better will be slow coming in the district. I don't count on any of it making a difference during the course of my children's tenure in the district. For many families, moving is a realistic option. What families need are realistic strategies for helping their students in their early elementary years - concrete advice on how to access inexpensive supplementation at home. It should be okay to direct, even encourage kids to watch certain YouTube series and play on free educational apps.