Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:4+ children are status symbols, white people with multiple kids are showing off their wealth (or are try hards who want people to think they have a lot of money).
I assume anyone with 4+ children is Catholic, Mormon, or Hasidic. Although of course I do know exceptions to the rule, but really most folks I know with four or more kids do fall into these categories. They tend not to be wealthy at all so it's not a wealth or try-hard thing, either.
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one stuck on the fact that OP doesn’t know how many siblings her husband has? 6 or 7??? You are having a 4th child with a man and you don’t know how many siblings he has? Jesus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:4+ children are status symbols, white people with multiple kids are showing off their wealth (or are try hards who want people to think they have a lot of money).
I assume anyone with 4+ children is Catholic, Mormon, or Hasidic. Although of course I do know exceptions to the rule, but really most folks I know with four or more kids do fall into these categories. They tend not to be wealthy at all so it's not a wealth or try-hard thing, either.
Anonymous wrote:4+ children are status symbols, white people with multiple kids are showing off their wealth (or are try hards who want people to think they have a lot of money).
Anonymous wrote:OP, you sound like you have a bad case of Main Character Syndrome. The truth is that people are thinking about you about .000000001% as often as you think they are.
Anonymous wrote:I may be pregnant with our 4th child (I am pretty sure but need to confirm with a test in a couple days).
DH and I come from larger families: mine from the Midwest; I have 3 brothers, and on that side of my family it's the norm to have 3-4 kids (I have 18 cousins just on my dad's side!). DH has 6 or 7 siblings
, from a traditional society where families basically have as many children as possible.
Anyway, we're in NW DC... And it's kind of funny how my only reservation is sort of self-consciousness here. Like, are people going to judge us for being such a large family? We're not wealthy, just feds who live simply and love our community.
We have one set of friends in the neighborhood who have 3 kids. But our other family friends have 2 max!! I don't think I can even think of any family in my neighborhood with 4 children!
...tell me you exist? If I were in the Midwest state where my relatives are, no one would bat an eyelash at a healthy big family. But here.... What are people's reactions going to be? I shouldn't care, but I do!
Anonymous wrote:I may be pregnant with our 4th child (I am pretty sure but need to confirm with a test in a couple days).
DH and I come from larger families: mine from the Midwest; I have 3 brothers, and on that side of my family it's the norm to have 3-4 kids (I have 18 cousins just on my dad's side!). DH has 6 or 7 siblings
, from a traditional society where families basically have as many children as possible.
Anyway, we're in NW DC... And it's kind of funny how my only reservation is sort of self-consciousness here. Like, are people going to judge us for being such a large family? We're not wealthy, just feds who live simply and love our community.
We have one set of friends in the neighborhood who have 3 kids. But our other family friends have 2 max!! I don't think I can even think of any family in my neighborhood with 4 children!
...tell me you exist? If I were in the Midwest state where my relatives are, no one would bat an eyelash at a healthy big family. But here.... What are people's reactions going to be? I shouldn't care, but I do!
Anonymous wrote:4+ children are status symbols, white people with multiple kids are showing off their wealth (or are try hards who want people to think they have a lot of money).
Anonymous wrote:I’m in the Midwest and only know two families with 4 kids. It isn’t common here either. The overwhelming majority of families have 2 kids, some with 3 if there is a SAHM.