Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Female or male?
Female- your most formal and stylish suit with pantyhose. Look at Nancy Pelosi for good style inspo. It's been 10 years since I was on a detail to the Capitol, but pantyhose was required then.
Are you a Republican? Democrats did not require panty hose on the Hill ten years ago.
Op, wear a business suit.
This is a more than 2 year old thread so hopefully OP is no longer soliciting opinions for this event.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A word about formal skin-tone hose for the generation that may not know: it's meant to be invisible. The entire goal of hose is to smooth out skin imperfections in your legs so that they look really nice. The lower the denier, the more invisible and diaphanous the hose will be (and also liable to tear under your fingers). Take some care to match your skin tone.
These days, going without hose in very formal conditions (meeting or being in the same room as a monarch, head of state or religious leader) is acceptable if the temperature is unbearably hot. But when in doubt, err on the side of quasi-invisible hose.
Brand recommendations?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Female or male?
Female- your most formal and stylish suit with pantyhose. Look at Nancy Pelosi for good style inspo. It's been 10 years since I was on a detail to the Capitol, but pantyhose was required then.
Are you a Republican? Democrats did not require panty hose on the Hill ten years ago.
Op, wear a business suit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Female or male?
Female- your most formal and stylish suit with pantyhose. Look at Nancy Pelosi for good style inspo. It's been 10 years since I was on a detail to the Capitol, but pantyhose was required then.
Any specific recommendations?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Female or male?
Female- your most formal and stylish suit with pantyhose. Look at Nancy Pelosi for good style inspo. It's been 10 years since I was on a detail to the Capitol, but pantyhose was required then.
Are you a Republican? Democrats did not require panty hose on the Hill ten years ago.
Op, wear a business suit.
Anonymous wrote:A word about formal skin-tone hose for the generation that may not know: it's meant to be invisible. The entire goal of hose is to smooth out skin imperfections in your legs so that they look really nice. The lower the denier, the more invisible and diaphanous the hose will be (and also liable to tear under your fingers). Take some care to match your skin tone.
These days, going without hose in very formal conditions (meeting or being in the same room as a monarch, head of state or religious leader) is acceptable if the temperature is unbearably hot. But when in doubt, err on the side of quasi-invisible hose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Female or male?
Female- your most formal and stylish suit with pantyhose. Look at Nancy Pelosi for good style inspo. It's been 10 years since I was on a detail to the Capitol, but pantyhose was required then.
Are you a Republican? Democrats did not require panty hose on the Hill ten years ago.
Op, wear a business suit.