Anonymous wrote:No pride in yourselves. Do your job to the best of your ability, so you can be proud of your accomplishments. So many lazy people these days, it's no wonder this country is about to fall apart. Allowing yourselves to be locked down, becoming apathetic and fearful and easily controlled.... that's how you become enslaved. Everyone needs to grow up and stop whining and being offended, and get out there and work, and stop thinking that the government has your best interests at heart. Absolute power is in their best interest, not yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, it’s a better expression than “ lean in” or “lean out” which is all I was hearing pre pandemic.
I like the term quite quitting, and, I agree it’s not passive aggressive. The balance of power is so skewed against the worker, it’s just allowing them the mental power to set up work/life boundaries and to care less about work.
I have learned from the pandemic that I have to be mentally ready to quit or leave my employer at any time, even if I thought things world stay the same for many years. I should give less to them, because they will definitely give less to me, in a heartbeat.
But it's a negative term. Quiet implies the employee who isn't breaking their backs for the employer is being passive aggressive and quitting is negative - it implies they just gave up.
Why can't it be framed as, people have woken up and decided a job is a job, they give their best effort within reason but aren't willing to sacrifice their health and sanity to work tons of extra hours for no extra pay or recognition.
I completely agree.
Boomers and GenX watch the Today show. They are shocked that the younger generations refuse to develop work stress related ulcers or heart palpitations.
Gen X has LIVED this for the start. We shook our heads at the millennials, especially those in tech, who wanted to live at the office. When Gen X hit the workforce, there were a few places where the office looked like a clubhouse, but that whole eat-sleep-breath the office thing came about during the millennials' time.
Anonymous wrote:As a mid-level manager, putting in only what is required is probably the only way that any kind of lack of resources is going to get addressed. I’m surrounded by stressed out people, and it just isn’t healthy or sustainable. And when upper-level management thinks nothing of taking weeks to get back to us, why should I strive for better and better?
Anonymous wrote:As a mid-level manager, putting in only what is required is probably the only way that any kind of lack of resources is going to get addressed. I’m surrounded by stressed out people, and it just isn’t healthy or sustainable. And when upper-level management thinks nothing of taking weeks to get back to us, why should I strive for better and better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, it’s a better expression than “ lean in” or “lean out” which is all I was hearing pre pandemic.
I like the term quite quitting, and, I agree it’s not passive aggressive. The balance of power is so skewed against the worker, it’s just allowing them the mental power to set up work/life boundaries and to care less about work.
I have learned from the pandemic that I have to be mentally ready to quit or leave my employer at any time, even if I thought things world stay the same for many years. I should give less to them, because they will definitely give less to me, in a heartbeat.
But it's a negative term. Quiet implies the employee who isn't breaking their backs for the employer is being passive aggressive and quitting is negative - it implies they just gave up.
Why can't it be framed as, people have woken up and decided a job is a job, they give their best effort within reason but aren't willing to sacrifice their health and sanity to work tons of extra hours for no extra pay or recognition.
Boomers and GenX watch the Today show. They are shocked that the younger generations refuse to develop work stress related ulcers or heart palpitations.
Gen X has LIVED this for the start. We shook our heads at the millennials, especially those in tech, who wanted to live at the office. When Gen X hit the workforce, there were a few places where the office looked like a clubhouse, but that whole eat-sleep-breath the office thing came about during the millennials' time.
Anonymous wrote:I've been doing this for years without such a negative label or any label at all, and what this should be is NORMAL.
Boomers and GenX watch the Today show. They are shocked that the younger generations refuse to develop work stress related ulcers or heart palpitations.
Gen X has LIVED this for the start. We shook our heads at the millennials, especially those in tech, who wanted to live at the office. When Gen X hit the workforce, there were a few places where the office looked like a clubhouse, but that whole eat-sleep-breath the office thing came about during the millennials' time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, it’s a better expression than “ lean in” or “lean out” which is all I was hearing pre pandemic.
I like the term quite quitting, and, I agree it’s not passive aggressive. The balance of power is so skewed against the worker, it’s just allowing them the mental power to set up work/life boundaries and to care less about work.
I have learned from the pandemic that I have to be mentally ready to quit or leave my employer at any time, even if I thought things world stay the same for many years. I should give less to them, because they will definitely give less to me, in a heartbeat.
But it's a negative term. Quiet implies the employee who isn't breaking their backs for the employer is being passive aggressive and quitting is negative - it implies they just gave up.
Why can't it be framed as, people have woken up and decided a job is a job, they give their best effort within reason but aren't willing to sacrifice their health and sanity to work tons of extra hours for no extra pay or recognition.
Huh? I think you have it backwards.
Boomers and GenX watch the Today show. They are shocked that the younger generations refuse to develop work stress related ulcers or heart palpitations.
Gen X has LIVED this for the start. We shook our heads at the millennials, especially those in tech, who wanted to live at the office. When Gen X hit the workforce, there were a few places where the office looked like a clubhouse, but that whole eat-sleep-breath the office thing came about during the millennials' time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, it’s a better expression than “ lean in” or “lean out” which is all I was hearing pre pandemic.
I like the term quite quitting, and, I agree it’s not passive aggressive. The balance of power is so skewed against the worker, it’s just allowing them the mental power to set up work/life boundaries and to care less about work.
I have learned from the pandemic that I have to be mentally ready to quit or leave my employer at any time, even if I thought things world stay the same for many years. I should give less to them, because they will definitely give less to me, in a heartbeat.
But it's a negative term. Quiet implies the employee who isn't breaking their backs for the employer is being passive aggressive and quitting is negative - it implies they just gave up.
Why can't it be framed as, people have woken up and decided a job is a job, they give their best effort within reason but aren't willing to sacrifice their health and sanity to work tons of extra hours for no extra pay or recognition.
Boomers and GenX watch the Today show. They are shocked that the younger generations refuse to develop work stress related ulcers or heart palpitations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, it’s a better expression than “ lean in” or “lean out” which is all I was hearing pre pandemic.
I like the term quite quitting, and, I agree it’s not passive aggressive. The balance of power is so skewed against the worker, it’s just allowing them the mental power to set up work/life boundaries and to care less about work.
I have learned from the pandemic that I have to be mentally ready to quit or leave my employer at any time, even if I thought things world stay the same for many years. I should give less to them, because they will definitely give less to me, in a heartbeat.
But it's a negative term. Quiet implies the employee who isn't breaking their backs for the employer is being passive aggressive and quitting is negative - it implies they just gave up.
Why can't it be framed as, people have woken up and decided a job is a job, they give their best effort within reason but aren't willing to sacrifice their health and sanity to work tons of extra hours for no extra pay or recognition.