Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yawn….I don’t know they keep doing these things. The crimes are clear, yet he’s been out of office 1.5 years and no prosecution. Attempt a coup, sure why not, a few nobodies spend a little time in jail and the bigwigs get nothing. I would think he already got rid of anything important by now….why wasn’t this done a year ago.
This lack of action is going to come back to haunt us, no consequences. There should have been significant indictments a year ago.
He can just announce his election run, then the Dems will stop all investigations since they are wimps. Had the chance to prosecute all this stuff a year ago, I think it’s too late now.
Two months ago, it was too late. Then the January 6 hearings started really getting going. Hutchison changed everything. After that, it's not too late anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yawn….I don’t know they keep doing these things. The crimes are clear, yet he’s been out of office 1.5 years and no prosecution. Attempt a coup, sure why not, a few nobodies spend a little time in jail and the bigwigs get nothing. I would think he already got rid of anything important by now….why wasn’t this done a year ago.
This lack of action is going to come back to haunt us, no consequences. There should have been significant indictments a year ago.
He can just announce his election run, then the Dems will stop all investigations since they are wimps. Had the chance to prosecute all this stuff a year ago, I think it’s too late now.
Anonymous wrote:Yawn….I don’t know they keep doing these things. The crimes are clear, yet he’s been out of office 1.5 years and no prosecution. Attempt a coup, sure why not, a few nobodies spend a little time in jail and the bigwigs get nothing. I would think he already got rid of anything important by now….why wasn’t this done a year ago.
This lack of action is going to come back to haunt us, no consequences. There should have been significant indictments a year ago.
Anonymous wrote:Be careful cheering on the witch hunt, one day they may be hunting you.
Anonymous wrote:Be careful cheering on the witch hunt, one day they may be hunting you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What does this have to do with anything?
Does the law suddenly not apply to Donnie just because, at some later date, he might announce he is running for president?
I don't recall Republicans complaining that HRC was under investigation when she was running for president or that Bill Clinton was under investigation when he was in the White House.
I don't recall the FBI raiding the homes or offices of Bill or Hillary despite the fact that we know Hillary "wiped her server."
Correct me if I am wrong.... but I think I would remember events like that.
The difference is that Hillary turned over the server to the FBI. The Donald stole a bunch of classified material…then he apparently only returned some of it. That’s why FBI is raising MAL….where’s the rest of the sh#t he stole?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What does this have to do with anything?
Does the law suddenly not apply to Donnie just because, at some later date, he might announce he is running for president?
I don't recall Republicans complaining that HRC was under investigation when she was running for president or that Bill Clinton was under investigation when he was in the White House.
I think Mr Price is jumping to conclusions. We know they were looking at next steps for Hunter. It wouldnt be at all surprising if they coordinate timing of Trump and Hunter actions to avoid accusations of political influence. I'll wait and see.
So, tit for tat. The law doesn't work that way.
There is ample evidence of wrongdoing by HB and the FBI evidently squelched that investigation (per Grassley's whistleblower letter).
The FBI is corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:
What does this have to do with anything?
Does the law suddenly not apply to Donnie just because, at some later date, he might announce he is running for president?
I don't recall Republicans complaining that HRC was under investigation when she was running for president or that Bill Clinton was under investigation when he was in the White House.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm afraid of getting my hopes up.
Republican and I also hope they find something. It's not going to look good if they dont.
Very true, and I assume they considered that risk. If the FBI decides to search a former President's home.. they must be INCREDIBLY sure of finding valuable information!