Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
Wow - you are extreme. I'm saying that it is NOT a rare thing for the students at our Big 3 to get 5's just from taking the regular 11th grade English/History classes taught to everyone. No - I don't go asking around for everyone's scores but I also know that I have never heard a single parent complain about whether the courses prep students for the AP Lit or APUSH and have never heard anyone complain about lack of rigor in those two courses. And our school's parents LOVE to complain!
Clearly this doesn't apply to every kid or to every school or to every teacher in a school. But the assertation that that dropping AP will result in crazy teachers who don't teach the core subject matter and either regress or retreat to a single favorite specialty in the subject doesn't apply across the board either.
If schools and parents don’t want the AP courses, then why take the exam?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
Wow - you are extreme. I'm saying that it is NOT a rare thing for the students at our Big 3 to get 5's just from taking the regular 11th grade English/History classes taught to everyone. No - I don't go asking around for everyone's scores but I also know that I have never heard a single parent complain about whether the courses prep students for the AP Lit or APUSH and have never heard anyone complain about lack of rigor in those two courses. And our school's parents LOVE to complain!
Clearly this doesn't apply to every kid or to every school or to every teacher in a school. But the assertation that that dropping AP will result in crazy teachers who don't teach the core subject matter and either regress or retreat to a single favorite specialty in the subject doesn't apply across the board either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
i don't but it sure seems you do. i haven't seen someone blindly defend something like you defend the AP curriculum since Rudy Giuliani.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
i don't but it sure seems you do. i haven't seen someone blindly defend something like you defend the AP curriculum since Rudy Giuliani.
Anonymous wrote:
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Anonymous wrote:There is no “rote AP formula,” PP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD is at NCS. I know they have AP Calculus because my DD wanted to enroll and they wouldn’t let her. They definitely have AP language, but they wouldn’t let my daughter enroll in that either. They have AP Biology, but my daughter was in the regular biology class. Honestly, I have only recently figured out that my DD is probably screwed in the college process because her classmates are in these AP classes but my DD isn’t. I heard they were being eliminated, but the school is no longer saying that to parents. They definitely gatekeep these classes.
Why did they block her?
Anonymous wrote:My DD is at NCS. I know they have AP Calculus because my DD wanted to enroll and they wouldn’t let her. They definitely have AP language, but they wouldn’t let my daughter enroll in that either. They have AP Biology, but my daughter was in the regular biology class. Honestly, I have only recently figured out that my DD is probably screwed in the college process because her classmates are in these AP classes but my DD isn’t. I heard they were being eliminated, but the school is no longer saying that to parents. They definitely gatekeep these classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.