Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not me. But I want to throw something out there: it's always assumed in these kinds of threads that X family situation (particularly a lot of kids) is "too hard" or "too complicated" for both parents to be working.
Am I the only one for whom working is easier? My nanny's job is definitely harder than mine!
I work full time, so does my husband. We both have a lot of flexibility. I ostensibly work 40 hours a week, 9-5. But honestly, with breaks, and doing some personal tasks (laundry, phone calls, emails) I probably only put in about six hours a day (which I know research has show is about the high water mark for thought/strategic desk work, so I don't think I'm THAT far out of the mainstream). One of us works from home each day, the other is in the office (we alternate). I don't make a ton, but more than enough to cover the nanny. I have a baby and a toddler, and we'll probably have a third down the line. The nanny keeps the house straightened up.
If I were watching the kids all day, I'd be exhausted at days end, and with no folded laundry to show for it.
I know I'm lucky that my job isn't that stressful and we can afford a nanny. But I don't think this is a total unicorn situation. Am I missing something here?
How old are your kids? I used to feel like you and I still believe that my kids early years were easier for me working (and them in daycare) than if I had stayed at home. So I agree. But, now that my kids are school aged I'm realizing just how much the world is not set up for two working parents. Camps end at 4 pm. School events are at 10 am. Practices are at 5 pm. My work day is the easiest part of the day but sometimes I feel like I'm running all over town trying to keep up with it all and I only have two.
If my kids were in school 9-3 and then I was actually available in the afternoon for pickups, homework, extracurriculars, etc, I'm convinced that would be easier than my current situation. But when they were 1 and 3? Yeah hell no you couldn't drag me away from my job if you tried. It was my lifeline in those years.
Anyway this is ultimately why I only have two. I would gladly do the baby and little years again, but I just can't fathom adding another full sized human + all of their interests and busy schedule into my life.
DP. I agree with you, but I guess that I felt like once I figured out how to make my job work to get to 8am drop-off, random mid-day school events, 3pm pick-up, and choir and soccer practice in the evening, it didn’t really matter how many how many kids I was dropping off or picking up or taking to piano lessons.
In some ways 4 kids isn’t any harder than two.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not me. But I want to throw something out there: it's always assumed in these kinds of threads that X family situation (particularly a lot of kids) is "too hard" or "too complicated" for both parents to be working.
Am I the only one for whom working is easier? My nanny's job is definitely harder than mine!
I work full time, so does my husband. We both have a lot of flexibility. I ostensibly work 40 hours a week, 9-5. But honestly, with breaks, and doing some personal tasks (laundry, phone calls, emails) I probably only put in about six hours a day (which I know research has show is about the high water mark for thought/strategic desk work, so I don't think I'm THAT far out of the mainstream). One of us works from home each day, the other is in the office (we alternate). I don't make a ton, but more than enough to cover the nanny. I have a baby and a toddler, and we'll probably have a third down the line. The nanny keeps the house straightened up.
If I were watching the kids all day, I'd be exhausted at days end, and with no folded laundry to show for it.
I know I'm lucky that my job isn't that stressful and we can afford a nanny. But I don't think this is a total unicorn situation. Am I missing something here?
How old are your kids? I used to feel like you and I still believe that my kids early years were easier for me working (and them in daycare) than if I had stayed at home. So I agree. But, now that my kids are school aged I'm realizing just how much the world is not set up for two working parents. Camps end at 4 pm. School events are at 10 am. Practices are at 5 pm. My work day is the easiest part of the day but sometimes I feel like I'm running all over town trying to keep up with it all and I only have two.
If my kids were in school 9-3 and then I was actually available in the afternoon for pickups, homework, extracurriculars, etc, I'm convinced that would be easier than my current situation. But when they were 1 and 3? Yeah hell no you couldn't drag me away from my job if you tried. It was my lifeline in those years.
Anyway this is ultimately why I only have two. I would gladly do the baby and little years again, but I just can't fathom adding another full sized human + all of their interests and busy schedule into my life.
Anonymous wrote:This is not me. But I want to throw something out there: it's always assumed in these kinds of threads that X family situation (particularly a lot of kids) is "too hard" or "too complicated" for both parents to be working.
Am I the only one for whom working is easier? My nanny's job is definitely harder than mine!
I work full time, so does my husband. We both have a lot of flexibility. I ostensibly work 40 hours a week, 9-5. But honestly, with breaks, and doing some personal tasks (laundry, phone calls, emails) I probably only put in about six hours a day (which I know research has show is about the high water mark for thought/strategic desk work, so I don't think I'm THAT far out of the mainstream). One of us works from home each day, the other is in the office (we alternate). I don't make a ton, but more than enough to cover the nanny. I have a baby and a toddler, and we'll probably have a third down the line. The nanny keeps the house straightened up.
If I were watching the kids all day, I'd be exhausted at days end, and with no folded laundry to show for it.
I know I'm lucky that my job isn't that stressful and we can afford a nanny. But I don't think this is a total unicorn situation. Am I missing something here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do. There is a spread in the kids ages. We have no outside help anymore - when they were smaller, we had a nanny. Now camps in the summer. Occasionally older one watches younger one, but that is rare and we pay $ when that happens.
Very little family help. Maybe once a season we ask for help. No extra help from neighbors.
We schedule car pools with other parents, but we do our fair share of the driving in the carpools.
We both have very flexible jobs and neither one of us has an overly demanding job.
I actually know several families with 4 kids where both parents work, so I find this to be an odd question.
It's odd that you find the question odd.
I tend to think anytime the parents are outnumbered that it's a lot of kids.
Everyone doesn't have a flexible job nor can they afford a nanny so when you take that out of the equation, wondering how it can be done without a SAH parent is a pretty valid question.
2 kids was the norm for the longest time and slowly but surely 3 is becoming more of a norm. 4 is unusual for my circle so it's all relative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do. There is a spread in the kids ages. We have no outside help anymore - when they were smaller, we had a nanny. Now camps in the summer. Occasionally older one watches younger one, but that is rare and we pay $ when that happens.
Very little family help. Maybe once a season we ask for help. No extra help from neighbors.
We schedule car pools with other parents, but we do our fair share of the driving in the carpools.
We both have very flexible jobs and neither one of us has an overly demanding job.
I actually know several families with 4 kids where both parents work, so I find this to be an odd question.
I'm not the OP, but I don't understand why this is an odd question. You mentioned several factors that might make having four kids more manageable, including having a nanny, a spread in ages, using an older sibling to watch the younger one, scheduling carpools with other parents, and having flexible and not very demanding jobs.
I have three kids who are close in age and did not have family help or a nanny and can absolutely say that without family or paid help, help, parenting three can be difficult to manage.
So why is this question specific to parents with 4 kids? 3 are hard, even 2 can be hard under certain circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:We do. There is a spread in the kids ages. We have no outside help anymore - when they were smaller, we had a nanny. Now camps in the summer. Occasionally older one watches younger one, but that is rare and we pay $ when that happens.
Very little family help. Maybe once a season we ask for help. No extra help from neighbors.
We schedule car pools with other parents, but we do our fair share of the driving in the carpools.
We both have very flexible jobs and neither one of us has an overly demanding job.
I actually know several families with 4 kids where both parents work, so I find this to be an odd question.
Anonymous wrote:It might be okay when they are little. It will get exponentially more difficult when they are older
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do. There is a spread in the kids ages. We have no outside help anymore - when they were smaller, we had a nanny. Now camps in the summer. Occasionally older one watches younger one, but that is rare and we pay $ when that happens.
Very little family help. Maybe once a season we ask for help. No extra help from neighbors.
We schedule car pools with other parents, but we do our fair share of the driving in the carpools.
We both have very flexible jobs and neither one of us has an overly demanding job.
I actually know several families with 4 kids where both parents work, so I find this to be an odd question.
I'm not the OP, but I don't understand why this is an odd question. You mentioned several factors that might make having four kids more manageable, including having a nanny, a spread in ages, using an older sibling to watch the younger one, scheduling carpools with other parents, and having flexible and not very demanding jobs.
I have three kids who are close in age and did not have family help or a nanny and can absolutely say that without family or paid help, help, parenting three can be difficult to manage.
Anonymous wrote:We do. There is a spread in the kids ages. We have no outside help anymore - when they were smaller, we had a nanny. Now camps in the summer. Occasionally older one watches younger one, but that is rare and we pay $ when that happens.
Very little family help. Maybe once a season we ask for help. No extra help from neighbors.
We schedule car pools with other parents, but we do our fair share of the driving in the carpools.
We both have very flexible jobs and neither one of us has an overly demanding job.
I actually know several families with 4 kids where both parents work, so I find this to be an odd question.