Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it sounds stupid wokespeak and so I avoid using it. If the desire is there, one can almost always avoid inserting a label (partner, girlfriend, significant other, spouse, whatever).
Person A: hey is Mary coming to the barbecue?
Person B: Yes, she rsvp'd they'd be coming after 3 o'clock.
Person A: I need to get a headcount. Is Susie coming to the escape room or not?
Person B: She is; she and Jim plan to attend.
Person A Grandma: Is Kara coming back to Massachusetts for Christmas?
Person B: No, so sad, this year Kara's spending Christmas with Lisa in California.
Person A Grandma: Oh! I'll miss her. Who is Lisa?
Person B: Grandma they've been seeing each other pretty seriously for 3 months now.
Sure, but in contexts like work the lack of specificity of partner is a plus. I don't necessarily want to divulge the name of my "partner" or what my status is.
Anonymous wrote:My boyfriend uses "partner" because he's too chicken to get married, but "boyfriend" makes him feel disposable, like we're just dating and someone else could swoop in and snatch me up. I guess he feels partners are committed, but boyfriends get dumped.
I refuse to use it. I told him he's just a boyfriend until he puts a ring on it, then he can be upgraded to husband. But I'm not using "partner", if he won't commit, why should I?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a ridiculous word to describe a person with whom one is in a romantic relationship; yet another attempt by infantilized progressives to rewrite the language to their own self-serving means.
Whenever someone uses that term, I ask how long they've been working together.
At least you out yourself as being uneducated. It’s best others know quickly. FYI, Partner has been the norm to be used for adults in countries like the UK and Australia forever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a ridiculous word to describe a person with whom one is in a romantic relationship; yet another attempt by infantilized progressives to rewrite the language to their own self-serving means.
Whenever someone uses that term, I ask how long they've been working together.
Language evolves, unlike you.
Anonymous wrote:It's a ridiculous word to describe a person with whom one is in a romantic relationship; yet another attempt by infantilized progressives to rewrite the language to their own self-serving means.
Whenever someone uses that term, I ask how long they've been working together.
Anonymous wrote:It's a ridiculous word to describe a person with whom one is in a romantic relationship; yet another attempt by infantilized progressives to rewrite the language to their own self-serving means.
Whenever someone uses that term, I ask how long they've been working together.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF/GF sounds juvenile past age 35 or so.
This is why my friends who have been together awhile but aren’t choosing to get married use it.
Anonymous wrote:I think it sounds stupid wokespeak and so I avoid using it. If the desire is there, one can almost always avoid inserting a label (partner, girlfriend, significant other, spouse, whatever).
Person A: hey is Mary coming to the barbecue?
Person B: Yes, she rsvp'd they'd be coming after 3 o'clock.
Person A: I need to get a headcount. Is Susie coming to the escape room or not?
Person B: She is; she and Jim plan to attend.
Person A Grandma: Is Kara coming back to Massachusetts for Christmas?
Person B: No, so sad, this year Kara's spending Christmas with Lisa in California.
Person A Grandma: Oh! I'll miss her. Who is Lisa?
Person B: Grandma they've been seeing each other pretty seriously for 3 months now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just following the lead of those trendsetting Canadians.
Care to share??
Huh. I’m Canadian so maybe that’s why the word partner doesn’t trigger me into a tizzy about what other people call their, well, partner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just following the lead of those trendsetting Canadians.
Care to share??