Anonymous wrote:I really do think we need to reassess whether the forced birthers are of sound enough mind to continue voting, driving, or basically doing anything else without a conservator. It seems like their brains just melt and drip out of their ears at the mention of “ten tiny toes”. Not sane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At some point you have to realize how much this will affect the economy of these states. Moral objections aside. Practically speaking. Can you hold a conference or event in TX if pregnant women in your organization or group feel they cannot attend because they could not get appropriate, life saving medical care in an emergency? I’m past child bearing years. But if I were pregnant looking at this, I wouldn’t travel to TX or Ohio if pregnant. What if I had a miscarriage or a placental abruption or my membranes break on the trip? I couldn’t go to the hospital and get the nationally accepted standard of care. Holding the event there would be pregnancy/sex discrimination.
Remember NC and the transgender bathroom bill? That’s where we are headed with red states that don’t adequately protect the health and life of the mother. No conventions, meetings etc that could include women of childbearing age. When my organization plans it’s next major meeting, I will be very vocal about it being somewhere where our pregnant employees can get adequate healthcare in a medical emergency.
+1 I would not want anyone dear to me who is pregnant to be in these states, as a resident or visitor. What if they miscarry? I know so many friends/family members who have miscarried and needed a D&C. Thankfully, they all live in blue states.
If I were pregnant, I would not want to be in those states. I can't imagine a husband who loves his wife would want them there, either.
Affluent women will want to deliver elsewhere. The top quality care is not going to be in red states.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At some point you have to realize how much this will affect the economy of these states. Moral objections aside. Practically speaking. Can you hold a conference or event in TX if pregnant women in your organization or group feel they cannot attend because they could not get appropriate, life saving medical care in an emergency? I’m past child bearing years. But if I were pregnant looking at this, I wouldn’t travel to TX or Ohio if pregnant. What if I had a miscarriage or a placental abruption or my membranes break on the trip? I couldn’t go to the hospital and get the nationally accepted standard of care. Holding the event there would be pregnancy/sex discrimination.
Remember NC and the transgender bathroom bill? That’s where we are headed with red states that don’t adequately protect the health and life of the mother. No conventions, meetings etc that could include women of childbearing age. When my organization plans it’s next major meeting, I will be very vocal about it being somewhere where our pregnant employees can get adequate healthcare in a medical emergency.
+1 I would not want anyone dear to me who is pregnant to be in these states, as a resident or visitor. What if they miscarry? I know so many friends/family members who have miscarried and needed a D&C. Thankfully, they all live in blue states.
If I were pregnant, I would not want to be in those states. I can't imagine a husband who loves his wife would want them there, either.
Anonymous wrote:At some point you have to realize how much this will affect the economy of these states. Moral objections aside. Practically speaking. Can you hold a conference or event in TX if pregnant women in your organization or group feel they cannot attend because they could not get appropriate, life saving medical care in an emergency? I’m past child bearing years. But if I were pregnant looking at this, I wouldn’t travel to TX or Ohio if pregnant. What if I had a miscarriage or a placental abruption or my membranes break on the trip? I couldn’t go to the hospital and get the nationally accepted standard of care. Holding the event there would be pregnancy/sex discrimination.
Remember NC and the transgender bathroom bill? That’s where we are headed with red states that don’t adequately protect the health and life of the mother. No conventions, meetings etc that could include women of childbearing age. When my organization plans it’s next major meeting, I will be very vocal about it being somewhere where our pregnant employees can get adequate healthcare in a medical emergency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Republicans don’t have slutty sex so they won’t ever have a miscarriage. DUH. Science.
+1. Only dirty, dirty sluts could ever need an abortion. That’s what the mentality boils down to. And dirty, dirty sluts deserve what they get.
I find it utterly fascinating that only democrats refer to women as sluts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Republicans don’t have slutty sex so they won’t ever have a miscarriage. DUH. Science.
+1. Only dirty, dirty sluts could ever need an abortion. That’s what the mentality boils down to. And dirty, dirty sluts deserve what they get.
I find it utterly fascinating that only democrats refer to women as sluts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Republicans don’t have slutty sex so they won’t ever have a miscarriage. DUH. Science.
+1. Only dirty, dirty sluts could ever need an abortion. That’s what the mentality boils down to. And dirty, dirty sluts deserve what they get.
I find it utterly fascinating that only democrats refer to women as sluts.
"Boys will be boys"..... Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Republicans don’t have slutty sex so they won’t ever have a miscarriage. DUH. Science.
+1. Only dirty, dirty sluts could ever need an abortion. That’s what the mentality boils down to. And dirty, dirty sluts deserve what they get.
I find it utterly fascinating that only democrats refer to women as sluts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Republicans don’t have slutty sex so they won’t ever have a miscarriage. DUH. Science.
+1. Only dirty, dirty sluts could ever need an abortion. That’s what the mentality boils down to. And dirty, dirty sluts deserve what they get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m seriously reconsidering having another child as a result of this. I can’t imagine being pregnant in the current climate. God forbid anything happen, my daughter could easily be left motherless. Hope the magic man in the sky is happy, though.
Do you live in a red state?
Not PP but I live in Virginia so it depends on how the governor decides the wind is blowing and whether parents are still angry at teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican women don't have miscarriages, so they're fine with the rest of you dying in childbirth.
Source for this comment?
Anonymous wrote:I thought Texas had a health/life exception?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m seriously reconsidering having another child as a result of this. I can’t imagine being pregnant in the current climate. God forbid anything happen, my daughter could easily be left motherless. Hope the magic man in the sky is happy, though.
Do you live in a red state?