Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC will not enforce any Covid vaccination requirement.
Hope that’s true. But then, why even have one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC will not enforce any Covid vaccination requirement.
Hope that’s true. But then, why even have one?
Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to Prek4 the youngest age range for the vaccine we haven’t found an appointment to have time to get three shots before school starts? Any clarity?
Anonymous wrote:DC will not enforce any Covid vaccination requirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To add: I get the idea originally for getting the vaccine to prevent spread. It just hasn't been shown, over time and with more data, that it really does that (or at least, does that very well).
We know, for a fact, that vaccinated individuals can still catch and transmit Covid.
Since the Covid vaccine does not prevent spread, there is no solid justification for shorter quarantines for vaccinated students.
+1
I think if the DOH or OSSE sticks with quarantines for close contact unvaccinated only they will have a lawsuit on their hands. Parents shouldn’t be forced to vaccinate when the vaccine doesn’t reduce spread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To add: I get the idea originally for getting the vaccine to prevent spread. It just hasn't been shown, over time and with more data, that it really does that (or at least, does that very well).
We know, for a fact, that vaccinated individuals can still catch and transmit Covid.
Since the Covid vaccine does not prevent spread, there is no solid justification for shorter quarantines for vaccinated students.
Anonymous wrote:Again, the quarantine policy differs by vaccination status, presumably because unvaxxed kids are presumed more likely to contract and spread the virus. That's not showing to be true -- the vaxxed are far less likely to get severe cases of illness and be hospitalized or die, but they aren't less likely to transmit. So the idea of keeping kids out of school on this basis is pointless.
When you have, in the case of DC, disproportionately Black kids not getting vaxxed, the result is more Black kids out of school for more days. Because there's not benefit of this, and there is demonstrated harm, it's a bad policy.
Anonymous wrote:To add: I get the idea originally for getting the vaccine to prevent spread. It just hasn't been shown, over time and with more data, that it really does that (or at least, does that very well).
Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to Prek4 the youngest age range for the vaccine we haven’t found an appointment to have time to get three shots before school starts? Any clarity?
Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to Prek4 the youngest age range for the vaccine we haven’t found an appointment to have time to get three shots before school starts? Any clarity?
Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to Prek4 the youngest age range for the vaccine we haven’t found an appointment to have time to get three shots before school starts? Any clarity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect our school will have indoor masks and opt in weekly testing but quarantines will be only for those either not vaccinated or not willing to do test to stay (assuming there is still access to lots of rapid tests).
If kids are given an option of either, I think the concerns about certain groups being more vaccine hesitant than others are pretty well addressed?
Still, we might be one of the last areas in the country not fully returned to life as before and I'm not sure how to feel about that.
TTS wasn't done above the ECE age for most schools, I think. I don't even know if it was done for the ECE age at many schools.
But the vaccine, as has been shown, does extremely little for preventing spread, particularly in the school age group. It is therefore difficult to use it to distinguish children on the basis of who can stay in the building and who can't. When the negative repercussions of the policy are large (keeping kids out of school, particularly ones that have already suffered extended periods of time out of school), and the positives are small to negligible, then the policy is bad. The policy is PARTICULARLY bad when it disproportionately hurts Black kids' education.
You can either keep disproportionately Black kids out of school or change the policy.
I’ll take: “Not supported by science and bullshit accusation of racism for $100, Alex!”