Anonymous wrote:Observationally, a lot of "functional" families that are drama-free, warm, welcoming, no abuse, addiction, codependency, etc. also tend to have this dynamic of exclusivity and "our home is a refuge, our family is better than everyone else". Not to say this is a bad thing, but in my experience having friends from these types of families, they breed sanctimony and judgement. Understandably so - when you come from a place of comfort and understanding you feel discomfort and even disgust when you're around dysfunction.
Anonymous wrote:My family was incredibly dysfunctional growing up, but I got a lot of therapy and am now very functional emotionally, professionally, etc. I don’t judge someone for their upbringing, which they can’t control, or even really for those adult behaviors they may have little control over. That doesn’t necessarily translate into seeking a close relationship with that person, though. I can be empathic from a distance, which indeed is important for maintaining good mental health (i.e., boundaries). Expecting a friend to deliver professional mental health services is inappropriate and unrealistic.
So, I don’t resent or dislike people who are struggling (unless they’re actively harming me or my family), but I’m also not going to be best friends with them, either. I don’t find that unreasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is giving a ton of credit and blame to parents and families of origin for how adults act on both ends. People from "functional" families with empathetic parents should be wise and empathetic themselves? Maybe, but some people with nice parents are jerks, and some people learn empathy through dealing with hardship. Often, I think people are more compassionate when they have an understanding of the struggle, having it easy can create blind spots.
Also, I don't think functional/dysfunctional is a binary.
Really good point. I have great, loving parents who gave us a lot of opportunities plus a safe, stable home and fun childhood. But they have their flaws and came from families with major dysfunction. One of my siblings became addicted to drugs as a young teen and it completely changed our trajectory as a family. I curdle at the label "dysfunctional family". We had all the "right" things in place and were never abused or lacking love, empathy, resources, good intentions. A perfect storm of many things combined to make us what we are today and I've stopped being shocked by the judgement we receive. I myself try to start from empathy regardless of anyone's circumstances. I know it can be tough.
Anonymous wrote:Observationally, a lot of "functional" families that are drama-free, warm, welcoming, no abuse, addiction, codependency, etc. also tend to have this dynamic of exclusivity and "our home is a refuge, our family is better than everyone else". Not to say this is a bad thing, but in my experience having friends from these types of families, they breed sanctimony and judgement. Understandably so - when you come from a place of comfort and understanding you feel discomfort and even disgust when you're around dysfunction.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like you’ve had some interactions with rather rude and insensitive people and you are generalizing it to others. No, I wouldn’t say “many people from loving, functional families” (your words) behave the way you are describing. If you are socializing with people that use “cutting” words towards others, find a better group of friends!
Anonymous wrote:Observationally, a lot of "functional" families that are drama-free, warm, welcoming, no abuse, addiction, codependency, etc. also tend to have this dynamic of exclusivity and "our home is a refuge, our family is better than everyone else". Not to say this is a bad thing, but in my experience having friends from these types of families, they breed sanctimony and judgement. Understandably so - when you come from a place of comfort and understanding you feel discomfort and even disgust when you're around dysfunction.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is giving a ton of credit and blame to parents and families of origin for how adults act on both ends. People from "functional" families with empathetic parents should be wise and empathetic themselves? Maybe, but some people with nice parents are jerks, and some people learn empathy through dealing with hardship. Often, I think people are more compassionate when they have an understanding of the struggle, having it easy can create blind spots.
Also, I don't think functional/dysfunctional is a binary.
Anonymous wrote:Observationally, a lot of "functional" families that are drama-free, warm, welcoming, no abuse, addiction, codependency, etc. also tend to have this dynamic of exclusivity and "our home is a refuge, our family is better than everyone else". Not to say this is a bad thing, but in my experience having friends from these types of families, they breed sanctimony and judgement. Understandably so - when you come from a place of comfort and understanding you feel discomfort and even disgust when you're around dysfunction.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is giving a ton of credit and blame to parents and families of origin for how adults act on both ends. People from "functional" families with empathetic parents should be wise and empathetic themselves? Maybe, but some people with nice parents are jerks, and some people learn empathy through dealing with hardship. Often, I think people are more compassionate when they have an understanding of the struggle, having it easy can create blind spots.
Also, I don't think functional/dysfunctional is a binary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a book of short stories by Douglas Coupland called Life After God. In it, in one of the stories, a man is at his mother’s house after a divorce. She tells him that no couple is in love forever, that when the love fades you have friendship and companionship. She also goes on to say that all people are flawed and finding your person to grow cold with is not about finding someone without flaws - it’s finding a person where you say “these are the flaws and problems I choose”.
Of course people from dysfunctional families deserve love and a chance to change and break patterns. But no one owes them the service of being patient with them while they work through their issues. That is to say, some people will be able to work with the dysfunction but others cannot. It is not a moral failing to not want to deal with someone else’s issues and growth process. It’s not a moral failing to not want to inherit toxic, dysfunctional in-laws and/or family drama. My family is not perfect, but they are very stable and drama free, almost boringly so. When I chose a spouse, I wanted someone who came from a similarly stable and supportive family.
OP here. I would never suggest that anyone has a duty to befriend a dysfunctional person, help them through their issues, and certainly not MARRY them. Of course not.
I'm saying I don't understand why people are often angry and cruel to people from dysfunctional backgrounds. Telling them to "get over it" for instance. Gossiping about them, etc. When I encounter a dysfunctional person I don't want to deal with, I think "there but for the grace of God go I" and move along. I don't say nasty things to or about them (why?) or act superior. So why wouldn't a person from a good background be able to do this?
NP, but why aren't they getting over it? Are they working on it? Or are they just wallowing in dysfunction, passing it onto their children and coworkers? It's exhausting when other people don't deal with their problems.
I think your question is more about why some people gossip or have little patience for others.
+1
Some things are impossible to “get over” even if you “work on it.”
I guess the proof is in the pudding OP. People just are impatient and judgmental - seeking or waiting for their acceptance will not come.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a book of short stories by Douglas Coupland called Life After God. In it, in one of the stories, a man is at his mother’s house after a divorce. She tells him that no couple is in love forever, that when the love fades you have friendship and companionship. She also goes on to say that all people are flawed and finding your person to grow cold with is not about finding someone without flaws - it’s finding a person where you say “these are the flaws and problems I choose”.
Of course people from dysfunctional families deserve love and a chance to change and break patterns. But no one owes them the service of being patient with them while they work through their issues. That is to say, some people will be able to work with the dysfunction but others cannot. It is not a moral failing to not want to deal with someone else’s issues and growth process. It’s not a moral failing to not want to inherit toxic, dysfunctional in-laws and/or family drama. My family is not perfect, but they are very stable and drama free, almost boringly so. When I chose a spouse, I wanted someone who came from a similarly stable and supportive family.
OP here. I would never suggest that anyone has a duty to befriend a dysfunctional person, help them through their issues, and certainly not MARRY them. Of course not.
I'm saying I don't understand why people are often angry and cruel to people from dysfunctional backgrounds. Telling them to "get over it" for instance. Gossiping about them, etc. When I encounter a dysfunctional person I don't want to deal with, I think "there but for the grace of God go I" and move along. I don't say nasty things to or about them (why?) or act superior. So why wouldn't a person from a good background be able to do this?
NP, but why aren't they getting over it? Are they working on it? Or are they just wallowing in dysfunction, passing it onto their children and coworkers? It's exhausting when other people don't deal with their problems.
I think your question is more about why some people gossip or have little patience for others.
+1