Anonymous wrote:There's no way she's 47, not because of how she looks, because I'm 45 and in the early 2000's she was five to eight years my elder.

I seriously think that celebrities pay people to silently edit their ages across media platforms in a very slow and strategic way. It's not all at once, but she was definitely more than two years older than me twelve years ago.

This is the hugest compliment that one could give Eva.

She has always been beautiful.

Probably a combo of good genetics + self-care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd be more impressed if she looked like this at 57.

why the eye roll? It's the truth. This is not that hard to achieve at 47! It's just not. 57 however is a whole different story. Menopause and 10 additional years of life have set in and does a real number on a woman's body.

she's also only produced one child. The more you produce the less elasticity you have left. Sagsville.

But she did it when she was in her 40s, when the skin does not bounce back easily. I had children at 38 and 44, and there was a marked difference.

2 versus 1 you answered your own question

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd be more impressed if she looked like this at 57.

why the eye roll? It's the truth. This is not that hard to achieve at 47! It's just not. 57 however is a whole different story. Menopause and 10 additional years of life have set in and does a real number on a woman's body.

she's also only produced one child. The more you produce the less elasticity you have left. Sagsville.

But she did it when she was in her 40s, when the skin does not bounce back easily. I had children at 38 and 44, and there was a marked difference.

She has an amazing buttocks

yes, she's quite petite, and I think she looks great. I aspire to get back in shape like that someday (skinny is way overrated - she looks fit/muscular). It likely won't be anytime soon, though.

Looks good to me in all those photos.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsflash: rich skinny celebrity still looks rich and skinny.

She's definitely not skinny.

yeah she's not skinny, she's athletic / quite solid

She’s 5’0 right? Any weight gain at that height makes you look huge. I just hope she’s healthy and has a good relationship with food. Maintaining weight as a short person is super hard. Reality slapped me in the face when I aged. No more size zero and I had to learn to accept the changes because I wasn’t willing to go to extremes against the natural progression of aging.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsflash: rich skinny celebrity still looks rich and skinny.

She's definitely not skinny.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsflash: rich skinny celebrity still looks rich and skinny.

She's definitely not skinny.

DCUM photos add 10lbs

Anonymous wrote:Newsflash: rich skinny celebrity still looks rich and skinny.

She's definitely not skinny.

Newsflash: rich skinny celebrity still looks rich and skinny.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd be more impressed if she looked like this at 57.

why the eye roll? It's the truth. This is not that hard to achieve at 47! It's just not. 57 however is a whole different story. Menopause and 10 additional years of life have set in and does a real number on a woman's body.

she's also only produced one child. The more you produce the less elasticity you have left. Sagsville.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd be more impressed if she looked like this at 57.

why the eye roll? It's the truth. This is not that hard to achieve at 47! It's just not. 57 however is a whole different story. Menopause and 10 additional years of life have set in and does a real number on a woman's body.

Anonymous wrote:47 is when it all started to go for sh-t for me. I’m 50 and I look like a thin person who had a Costco sized jar of jelly injected between my uterus and my skin.

But I never had a rack like her, sadly.

Thank you for this post. It is amazing.