Anonymous wrote:No. Even if you want kids. There is no guarantee you’re going to get a guy who will be a good dad
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's certainly a better deal for women than it is for men
I agree with this. I don’t see why most men get married.
This is untrue: men with SAHW perform better in career vs those who are unmarried. They have a free laborer on everything else at home.
They are also happier and healthier than single men are
https://www.menshealth.com/health/a19516451/why-married-men-are-happier/
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/marriage-and-mens-health
https://ifstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IFSMenandMarriageResearchBrief2.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's certainly a better deal for women than it is for men
I agree with this. I don’t see why most men get married.
This is untrue: men with SAHW perform better in career vs those who are unmarried. They have a free laborer on everything else at home.
Anonymous wrote:If both people are good people then marriage is worth it for both. People are too focused on just getting what they want or thinking they can have it all. The feminist movement has done some good but it has also done a lot to make women miserable. The happiest married couples are those with traditional roles. Let the dads hunt and gather and let the moms nurture and nest. That's the life I have chosen and I couldn't be any happier. I don't have a chip on my shoulder and feel like I have something to prove to the world
Anonymous wrote:30% of married women do not work. They probably think it's worth it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's certainly a better deal for women than it is for men
I agree with this. I don’t see why most men get married.
This is untrue: men with SAHW perform better in career vs those who are unmarried. They have a free laborer on everything else at home.
Not sure how its free if he's providing everything
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's certainly a better deal for women than it is for men
I agree with this. I don’t see why most men get married.
This is untrue: men with SAHW perform better in career vs those who are unmarried. They have a free laborer on everything else at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's probably worth it if you want children.
No children? It's probably not worth it: just be boyfriend and girlfriend.
On this I agree - particularly cause children are the only way to get a really solid deduction as a MC person. Now if you divorce, you lose that anyway. So it’s a toss up.
Anonymous wrote:All i know is that between the ages of 40 and 60, most men could trade up but most women could not
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's certainly a better deal for women than it is for men
I agree with this. I don’t see why most men get married.
This is untrue: men with SAHW perform better in career vs those who are unmarried. They have a free laborer on everything else at home.
Not sure how its free if he's providing everything
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's certainly a better deal for women than it is for men
I agree with this. I don’t see why most men get married.
This is untrue: men with SAHW perform better in career vs those who are unmarried. They have a free laborer on everything else at home.