Anonymous wrote:Question from a non sports person. If more schools join the Big 10, does the conference name change to Big 17 or Big 20 or however many schools are in the Conference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Big 12 is going after Colorado , the Arizona schools, Utah
There’s only 2 more spots to 18 before the money gets deluted
The SEC will take Florida State since Florida is a huge state you can have redundancy and increase payout.
There are only 3 schools that enrich the B1G at this point. Stanford/Cal and Notre Dame.
I think they want Stanford over Cal. The AD at Cal needs to go, there are big issues with the women's soccer and women's swim coaches that were covered up.
Anonymous wrote:The Big 12 is going after Colorado , the Arizona schools, Utah
There’s only 2 more spots to 18 before the money gets deluted
The SEC will take Florida State since Florida is a huge state you can have redundancy and increase payout.
There are only 3 schools that enrich the B1G at this point. Stanford/Cal and Notre Dame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people are interested in this, you should follow Greg Flugaur on twitter. He has good sources in the Big10.
Two things matter to the big10 presidents, who ultimately decide who is allowed in. Money and research (meaning research money and the AAU). Who brings in the money? ND. Maybe UNC. Maybe UVA. Stanford?
I wanted to add that I wouldn't be surprised if GA Tech is invited to the Big10. Atlanta TV market, recruiting base for the OSU/Michigan/PSU in the south plus lots of research money. Yes they are not great athletically but it makes sense. Along the same lines, I can see Miami (FL) in the big10.
Anonymous wrote:If people are interested in this, you should follow Greg Flugaur on twitter. He has good sources in the Big10.
Two things matter to the big10 presidents, who ultimately decide who is allowed in. Money and research (meaning research money and the AAU). Who brings in the money? ND. Maybe UNC. Maybe UVA. Stanford?
Anonymous wrote:To answer the question. A metric shit-ton. Maryland wasn't brought in to the Big 10 to strengthen the conference from a football perspective. From a sports perspective, Maryland adds value across the board otherwise. Strong basketball (women and men). Made the Big 10 into a viable mens lacrosse conference (and made the womens lacrosse conference a 2 trick pony). Maryland won 5 titles each of the first three years in the big 10 across all sports. Aside from the Covid years, Maryland regularly wins 3 to 5 titles per year and has virtually owned lacrosse (on the mens side all but 1 of the regular season championships and half of the conference tournament championships; on the womens side, all but two tournament championships and all but one regular season). Across all sports with a championship sponsored by the NCAA (i.e., not football and excluding early lacrosse), Maryland has won more national titles than any current big 10 school (excluding UCLA and USC) other than Penn State and Michigan. The womens lacrosse team alone has won as many national championships than the entire athletics programs across Northwestern, Purdue and Rutgers COMBINED. For the 2021-22 year, Maryland is second among Big 10 schools in both the mens and womens rankings and is the only Big 10 school in the top 10 of both rankings.
Aside from that, Maryland brings strong across the board academics, is a major research institution and (not for nothing) the DC/Baltimore media market. It also is a recruiting hot bed for a number of sports (including lacrosse, basketball and, to a somewhat lesser extent, football).
The 2014 expansion was a win-win for the conference and the institution. I, for one, can't wait to watch the ACC collapse and the blue blood Carolina schools (Dook in particular) struggle to find a home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good God.
I don’t think Clemson realizes it’s future yet. Ugh.
They do. You just need a majority of the ACC to revise the GoR or to vote to dissolve the conference. Clemson, Florida State, Miami, UVA, and UNC all have better landing spots. Pitt has an obvious move to a more secure conference. That's six of the 8 votes they'd need to dissolve the conference. You just need two more schools to see the Big 12 as the better near term bet and the ACC is done. It really depends on how much the SEC and B1G want to expand and, to a lesser extent, the Big 12.
Anonymous wrote:Good God.
I don’t think Clemson realizes it’s future yet. Ugh.