Anonymous wrote:Definitely much better at ours. It is a large part of the reason we left MCPS. In MCPS our kids' classes had several kids who were constant disruptions in class, but the school did nothing about them. The private schools review school records and ask about disciplinary incidents. Kids who are constant disruptions aren't getting in in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is delightful and so messed up. Our private is terrified of reputational risk and will only remove a kid for really extreme behaviors. My daughter had a kid in her class this year that disrupted things every day. Emotionally needy kid who constantly ruined things for others. Physically aggressive and accused by one family of being sexually aggressive with their daughter. Aaaand, he's returning next year. We have mostly been in private but I think there are a lot of private school kids who are there because they couldn't hack public.
Anonymous wrote:I think the private school kids are savvier about their behavior.
They engage less in the kinds of obvious bad behavior that attract attention (e.g., being loud/rude in hallways, talking throughout performances), and probably are more capable, as a whole, of displaying good manners around adults.
But they're equal to or better at pulling off sneaky bad behavior (e.g., drinking before/during night-time events, bullying people outside of their clique).
Anonymous wrote:Yes, private school kids have better behavior (at school). I think it’s a combination on counseling out badly behaved kids and having stricter protocols. Family helps too.
When my kid was in public school there were only 3 kids that behaved badly, but they were really bad. Screaming, hitting, talking etc. This behavior would not be tolerated in my kids current private school (we have been in private more than in public at this point)
Anonymous wrote:At the elementary school level, absolutely.
Anonymous wrote:I’m curious if this is true. Do private schools have more strict behavioral policies or are the kids just naturally better behaved?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience -- YES!
The reason is pretty simple: private schools do not have to accept (or keep) disrespectful, troublemaking, or otherwise misbehaving students.
This is so FALSE. Beyond FALSE. The number of kids who get away with godawful sh!t at private schools is staggering. There are fewer kids in private than public so it may SEEM like that. As a private school parent for the last 14 years, I can't even count the number of HORRIBLE children who get admitted because the parents guarantee a certain amount of money. I know FOUR families who's misbehaving miscreants are "transferring" to other schools outside of the application process because of money.
The kids don't get kicked out. And the kids who should not be admitted are admitted because the Heads around here are competing to build the biggest endowment. Lots of BDE amongst the private administration.