Anonymous wrote:I lived by a a flight path, 200 from feet train tracks in a busy street that was a corner house.
I don’t see why anything had to be disclosed. Folks have Google maps. Heck when we moved in walls had cracks in plaster due to vibrations.
I recall when 13 a girl during thanksgiving dinner crashed into out retaining wall with her mustang. Normal stuff
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who are bothered by plane noise seriously bother me. Especially being that far out.
I walk/run by DCA several days a week - it's about 1.5 mile from my home on paths, and considerably shorter if you draw a direct line. It's white noise. And you physically FEEL takeoff and landing sometimes.
Not a big deal, but a tradeoff for living in the neighborhood we choose to live in.
If you're that abnormally sensitive, move elsewhere and don't complain about not having an airport you can get to easily.
The airport is 1.5 miles from your house?
Anonymous wrote:People who are bothered by plane noise seriously bother me. Especially being that far out.
I walk/run by DCA several days a week - it's about 1.5 mile from my home on paths, and considerably shorter if you draw a direct line. It's white noise. And you physically FEEL takeoff and landing sometimes.
Not a big deal, but a tradeoff for living in the neighborhood we choose to live in.
If you're that abnormally sensitive, move elsewhere and don't complain about not having an airport you can get to easily.
Anonymous wrote:Great point. It’s not just the noise. It’s the particulates, especially the very small ones that have recently been found to be terribly dangerous (it’s better to stand in the middle of the highway whole day long than live under a flight path lots of research at UWA, Europe etc)
Anonymous wrote:You’d think the market will have spoken. But it hasn’t yet. It will.
I think the issue has been the generally awful and old housing stock in DC. Watching real estate shows from LA is just like what?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disclose? It's publicly available info! That's like suing for failing to disclose that 495 is 400 yards away and there is highway noise.
Hilarious.
Haha, this is wrong. If you think that flight paths are the same as highways from a disclosure perspective, that's wrong. If I were on a jury, I would totally sympathize with a buyer who had no clue about plane noise that only happened at 5:30 am, but I would not sympathize with a buyer who complained about a nearby highway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disclose? It's publicly available info! That's like suing for failing to disclose that 495 is 400 yards away and there is highway noise.
Hilarious.
Haha, this is wrong. If you think that flight paths are the same as highways from a disclosure perspective, that's wrong. If I were on a jury, I would totally sympathize with a buyer who had no clue about plane noise that only happened at 5:30 am, but I would not sympathize with a buyer who complained about a nearby highway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disclose? It's publicly available info! That's like suing for failing to disclose that 495 is 400 yards away and there is highway noise.
Hilarious.
Haha, this is wrong. If you think that flight paths are the same as highways from a disclosure perspective, that's wrong. If I were on a jury, I would totally sympathize with a buyer who had no clue about plane noise that only happened at 5:30 am, but I would not sympathize with a buyer who complained about a nearby highway.