Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.
Neat. What percentage of the very, very long list of school shootings in the US since the 90s were stopped by SROs?
Hint: damn few.
Here’s a report with some statistics for you:
https://cops.usdoj.gov/RIC/Publications/cops-w0903-pub.pdf
It highlights 236 cases, of which 168 were adverted. It also contains twelve case studies of SRO-related events. On a personal level, I witnessed the SRO at my high school remove three knives and one gun from students, all taken without incident. He did a lot more than that, but those are the incidences I witnessed with my own eyes. The simple truth is there are many of us who have seen the value of SROs.
We all know the MoCo council pulled SROs without actually surveying the community. Instead, they listened to a small, yet vocal group. We also know that the principals were unanimous in wanting them to remain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.
Neat. What percentage of the very, very long list of school shootings in the US since the 90s were stopped by SROs?
Hint: damn few.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.
Neat. What percentage of the very, very long list of school shootings in the US since the 90s were stopped by SROs?
Hint: damn few.
School shootings typically involve assault style rifles, large magazines, and tons of ammo. SROs are seriously outgunned.
Maybe instead of MCPS asking them to supply bus drivers, we should ask the National Guard to provide armed soldiers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe I’ve missed it, but I haven’t seen anything about increased security at MCPS schools or even what the safety measures already in place are. I went to the website and could not find info on this. I’ve noticed differences between schools when it comes to security measures. I’d like to know what MCPS already requires, and what it is planning to do county-wide.
MCPS is doing fine. The problem is the Republican party which is blocking the enactment of common-sense gun control to address these issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe I’ve missed it, but I haven’t seen anything about increased security at MCPS schools or even what the safety measures already in place are. I went to the website and could not find info on this. I’ve noticed differences between schools when it comes to security measures. I’d like to know what MCPS already requires, and what it is planning to do county-wide.
MCPS is doing fine. The problem is the Republican party which is blocking the enactment of common-sense gun control to address these issues.
Anonymous wrote:Our school buzzes everyone in without asking why they are coming to the school and who they are. The second set of doors is usually propped open. Sometimes even the front set of doors are propped open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.
Neat. What percentage of the very, very long list of school shootings in the US since the 90s were stopped by SROs?
Hint: damn few.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe I’ve missed it, but I haven’t seen anything about increased security at MCPS schools or even what the safety measures already in place are. I went to the website and could not find info on this. I’ve noticed differences between schools when it comes to security measures. I’d like to know what MCPS already requires, and what it is planning to do county-wide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.
Neat. What percentage of the very, very long list of school shootings in the US since the 90s were stopped by SROs?
Hint: damn few.
Anonymous wrote:I am a former WJ parent and not the pp. A few years back, a student went to the SRO about a former student who was showing photos on SM of himself with an ak47 and statements about shooting up his former school. He was arrested and no one was shot. I count that as am SRO saving lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.
No there have not been.
Yes there are. Google is your friend.
There have not been any cases so google is your enemy.
What is wrong with you? Of course there are positive stories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gun control
Gun control has nothing to do with making MCPS safer. MCPS is doing nothing. Most parents wanted them to remove SRO's and police from the schools. They did.
How did the police do in Uvalde? Or Parkland?
Don’t get me wrong, I support having SROs in schools. I just think it is ridiculous to think they’d stop school shootings.
They didn't do well but that's not a justification to not have them. If they did their job they would have gone in, killed the killer and got those kids medical attention and that is the point.
If these incidents are representative, SROs will stand around, run away or arrest parents.
There have been SRO's who have also saved lives.