Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been extremely violent threats against school boards across the country.
Asking for the military sounds extreme, but so are the nut jobs out there losing their minds on school boards
[citation needed]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Actually I can if those boys were severely bullying the other student. I'd bet my house the kids who got punished were savagely bullying the other kid and the mouth-breathing parents decided to make it about "hurrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrr pronouns!!!"
Maybe pronouns shouldn't be the focus in school? We had lived just fine in progressive cities with thriving LGBTQ communities without pronouns for many decades.
Maybe no one should excuse making threats that a police chief called “extremely vulgar, hateful and disturbing” for any reason?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been extremely violent threats against school boards across the country.
Asking for the military sounds extreme, but so are the nut jobs out there losing their minds on school boards
[citation needed]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have been extremely violent threats against school boards across the country.
Asking for the military sounds extreme, but so are the nut jobs out there losing their minds on school boards
[citation needed]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Actually I can if those boys were severely bullying the other student. I'd bet my house the kids who got punished were savagely bullying the other kid and the mouth-breathing parents decided to make it about "hurrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrr pronouns!!!"
Maybe pronouns shouldn't be the focus in school? We had lived just fine in progressive cities with thriving LGBTQ communities without pronouns for many decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Actually I can if those boys were severely bullying the other student. I'd bet my house the kids who got punished were savagely bullying the other kid and the mouth-breathing parents decided to make it about "hurrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrr pronouns!!!"
Maybe pronouns shouldn't be the focus in school? We had lived just fine in progressive cities with thriving LGBTQ communities without pronouns for many decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Actually I can if those boys were severely bullying the other student. I'd bet my house the kids who got punished were savagely bullying the other kid and the mouth-breathing parents decided to make it about "hurrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrr pronouns!!!"
Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. Somebody posted the receipts of all the RWNJ’s threatening violence against local school boards.
Good work!
Thank you, it’s ridiculous though that these need to be pointed out.
I think it does. It beggars belief that parents are threatening school board members with such frequency and prevalence that it requires military intervention. Even with the examples above, the NSBA seems really heavy handed, asking for parents to be investigated as terrorists and now asking for literal military force used against them. It's fairly common for companies and agencies to receive threats. But most sophisticated organizations have the threats analyzed by professionals for credibility. And most threats are not credible. NSBA seems to have skipped over this step entirely.
Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?
Actually I can if those boys were severely bullying the other student. I'd bet my house the kids who got punished were savagely bullying the other kid and the mouth-breathing parents decided to make it about "hurrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrr pronouns!!!"
Anonymous wrote:
Um...
According to the letter, the boys' families were informed that the complaint and investigation was because the boys didn't call another student by their preferred pronouns of "they" and "them."
Can you imagine going after boys for this?