Anonymous wrote:Sorry, is breastfeeding education going to make mothers start lactating after they've been using formula for weeks/months? What do you recommend we do for those babies, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is an interesting and relevant topic for discussion, OP, but so don’t think DCUM (or even most of the mainstream) is emotionally able for this kind of exploration. This goes into deeper questions of sovereignty, radical responsibility, and connection to self that are just outside of where most people are operating.
No, it isn't. "Breastfeeding education" is not relevant or helpful to the babies that need formula right now to survive.
You just love the idea of starving babies you sicko.
As I said, most are not emotionally capable of a deeper level of thinking, only reacting by lashing out and making absurd accusations. Of course breastfeeding education isn’t the priority for non-lactating mothers whose babies are given formula.
But longer term thinking about societal shifts, paradigm shifts, so that there isn’t a crisis of the same level every time a corporation or government agency fails the public… well, that’s not really something many are able or willing to explore.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is an interesting and relevant topic for discussion, OP, but so don’t think DCUM (or even most of the mainstream) is emotionally able for this kind of exploration. This goes into deeper questions of sovereignty, radical responsibility, and connection to self that are just outside of where most people are operating.
Anonymous wrote:I know many, many women have valid reasons for using a clothes washer. I tend to think some do, understandably, to simplify their lives and relieve the burden of being tethered to the laundry - either because of stress, going back to work, or some other non-medical reason.
I can't help but wonder how many families use clothes washers out of convenience, and how we might all be better served if we gave women the space, time and support to wash clothes by hand. I recognize that there are different interests at play.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is an interesting and relevant topic for discussion, OP, but so don’t think DCUM (or even most of the mainstream) is emotionally able for this kind of exploration. This goes into deeper questions of sovereignty, radical responsibility, and connection to self that are just outside of where most people are operating.
No, it isn't. "Breastfeeding education" is not relevant or helpful to the babies that need formula right now to survive.
You just love the idea of starving babies you sicko.
As I said, most are not emotionally capable of a deeper level of thinking, only reacting by lashing out and making absurd accusations. Of course breastfeeding education isn’t the priority for non-lactating mothers whose babies are given formula.
But longer term thinking about societal shifts, paradigm shifts, so that there isn’t a crisis of the same level every time a corporation or government agency fails the public… well, that’s not really something many are able or willing to explore.
Being a sovereign citizen won't keep you from having latching or supply problems or mastitis
You’re taking it down the political route with the sovereign citizen quip.
OP’s post is *about* increasing support for breastfeeding issues such as you mentioned. But it goes deeper than just providing lactation consultants. It really would take a radical shift in how society treats, values, and cares for expectant, birthing, and postpartum mothers. And as DCUM shows, people aren’t really interested in that. So! Carry on as you are!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is an interesting and relevant topic for discussion, OP, but so don’t think DCUM (or even most of the mainstream) is emotionally able for this kind of exploration. This goes into deeper questions of sovereignty, radical responsibility, and connection to self that are just outside of where most people are operating.
No, it isn't. "Breastfeeding education" is not relevant or helpful to the babies that need formula right now to survive.
You just love the idea of starving babies you sicko.
As I said, most are not emotionally capable of a deeper level of thinking, only reacting by lashing out and making absurd accusations. Of course breastfeeding education isn’t the priority for non-lactating mothers whose babies are given formula.
But longer term thinking about societal shifts, paradigm shifts, so that there isn’t a crisis of the same level every time a corporation or government agency fails the public… well, that’s not really something many are able or willing to explore.
Being a sovereign citizen won't keep you from having latching or supply problems or mastitis
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry OP, but this post is stunningly insensitive and ill-timed. What is a mother who was depending on formula supposed to do at this point? I breastfed my child for 12 months and I remember how important it was to establish milk supply after the birth. I also regret not using formula more because I was a stressed out mess. But that's beside the point, because if a person has not established their milk supply, regardless of whether this was for their "convenience" (I see that word thrown out there a lot as a way to judge people who made different choices than you did, so lame and trollish OP), they CANNOT BREASTFEED AND THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR CHILD STARVING. "Breastfeeding education" is not going to change that, referring to "convenience" is not going to change that, all you are saying is you think their child deserves to starve to death, which of course is par for the course for lactivists like you. Go to hell OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is an interesting and relevant topic for discussion, OP, but so don’t think DCUM (or even most of the mainstream) is emotionally able for this kind of exploration. This goes into deeper questions of sovereignty, radical responsibility, and connection to self that are just outside of where most people are operating.
No, it isn't. "Breastfeeding education" is not relevant or helpful to the babies that need formula right now to survive.
You just love the idea of starving babies you sicko.
As I said, most are not emotionally capable of a deeper level of thinking, only reacting by lashing out and making absurd accusations. Of course breastfeeding education isn’t the priority for non-lactating mothers whose babies are given formula.
But longer term thinking about societal shifts, paradigm shifts, so that there isn’t a crisis of the same level every time a corporation or government agency fails the public… well, that’s not really something many are able or willing to explore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry OP, but this post is stunningly insensitive and ill-timed. What is a mother who was depending on formula supposed to do at this point? I breastfed my child for 12 months and I remember how important it was to establish milk supply after the birth. I also regret not using formula more because I was a stressed out mess. But that's beside the point, because if a person has not established their milk supply, regardless of whether this was for their "convenience" (I see that word thrown out there a lot as a way to judge people who made different choices than you did, so lame and trollish OP), they CANNOT BREASTFEED AND THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR CHILD STARVING. "Breastfeeding education" is not going to change that, referring to "convenience" is not going to change that, all you are saying is you think their child deserves to starve to death, which of course is par for the course for lactivists like you. Go to hell OP.
+1
Anonymous wrote:I know many, many women have valid reasons for using formula. I tend to think some do, understandably, to simplify their lives and relieve the burden of being tethered to baby for 12 months nursing - either because of stress, going back to work, or some other non-medical reason (for mom or baby).
I can't help but wonder how many families use formula out of convenience, and how we might all be better served if we gave women the space, time and support to breastfeed. I recognize that there are different interests at play.
This is not meant to suggest any judgment or incite any breastmilk/formula wars.
I'm watching the news unfold today about Biden invoking the defense production act to produce formula. Heaven knows there are so many broken parts in our systems, but I've been mulling this over for weeks now. Why aren't we putting any effort into breastfeeding education??
I'm about 10 years out now from having had an infant. A coworker recently returned and mentioned using formula to both give dad an "opportunity" to feed and to get a break. And I felt a little sad for her.
For those of you closer to this stage, I'm curious about your take on this. I sense a level of panic around this formula shortage and I wonder how many parents actually medically need it, and how many are on it out of convenience and why we don't do anything to help support those families?
Your trotting out that tired old word "convenience" derails any well-meant intentions you may have had with this post right at the start (if you actually did even have any). People who refer to women's bodily needs and functions, their physical health, mental health, time, financial needs, other family demands, etc. as "convenience" are horrible, awful, people. Full stop. Either you are actually a woman who's been brainwashed to think birth and breastfeeding are on par with deciding whether or not to bop out to the mall to pick up a new purse, or you're just a garden-variety troll...I "feel a little bit sad" for you, sweetie.