Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks notice/two weeks severance is customary even after just a day of work.
Customary where?
Anonymous wrote:You do not have to pay 2 weeks severance to a nanny who has worked for you 3 weeks and with whom you don't even have a contract. That's crazy!
Anonymous wrote:Two weeks notice/two weeks severance is customary even after just a day of work.
Anonymous wrote:People treat these nanny jobs like the employer is some kind of big company. If you employ less than 25 people a lot of these rules don’t apply.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People treat these nanny jobs like the employer is some kind of big company. If you employ less than 25 people a lot of these rules don’t apply.
Or we are treating them like human beings.
Anonymous wrote:If a nanny, after just three weeks, knows her new job is a bad fit or even awful, how much notice should she give her employers?
Anonymous wrote:People treat these nanny jobs like the employer is some kind of big company. If you employ less than 25 people a lot of these rules don’t apply.
Anonymous wrote:If a nanny, after just three weeks, knows her new job is a bad fit or even awful, how much notice should she give her employers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Severance has nothing to do with length of employment! It’s to help the employee bridge the time between termination and a new job. I would think two weeks is the minimum.
Severance actually has everything to do with the length of employment. And there is no right to it unless agreed upon between the employer and employee.
Really? So how much severance do you give for an employee has been with you for ten years?
Severance has nothing to do with length of employment in any industry. For OP, the nanny didn’t work out. Give her two weeks pay and be on your way. If the nanny felt the same about OP and the job, she’d give two weeks notice.
DP here, and this is just wrong. I don't even know what to say. Severance is almost always based on a formula related to length of time on the job, level of seniority, and salary. In pretty much any other setting, 3 weeks employment would never entitle a person to severance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Severance has nothing to do with length of employment! It’s to help the employee bridge the time between termination and a new job. I would think two weeks is the minimum.
Severance actually has everything to do with the length of employment. And there is no right to it unless agreed upon between the employer and employee.
Really? So how much severance do you give for an employee has been with you for ten years?
Severance has nothing to do with length of employment in any industry. For OP, the nanny didn’t work out. Give her two weeks pay and be on your way. If the nanny felt the same about OP and the job, she’d give two weeks notice.