Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My fourth grader scored 288 in MAP-R. He mostly reads nonfiction books and feels it is getting harder to find books in the library.
Please share the books your kids at a similar level are reading in any genre. Thanks.
If this is true, I think we should be asking the kid for advice. My kid in the 7th grade got a 253 today which I think is pretty good. 288 in grade 4 is a really high score.
Your 7th grader did fantastic. The ES scoring is different than MS scoring but this cannot be real or OP child is a genius. 288 is very high in high school, let alone in ES or MS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My fourth grader scored 288 in MAP-R. He mostly reads nonfiction books and feels it is getting harder to find books in the library.
Please share the books your kids at a similar level are reading in any genre. Thanks.
If this is true, I think we should be asking the kid for advice. My kid in the 7th grade got a 253 today which I think is pretty good. 288 in grade 4 is a really high score.
Your 7th grader did fantastic. The ES scoring is different than MS scoring but this cannot be real or OP child is a genius. 288 is very high in high school, let alone in ES or MS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My fourth grader scored 288 in MAP-R. He mostly reads nonfiction books and feels it is getting harder to find books in the library.
Please share the books your kids at a similar level are reading in any genre. Thanks.
If this is true, I think we should be asking the kid for advice. My kid in the 7th grade got a 253 today which I think is pretty good. 288 in grade 4 is a really high score.
Anonymous wrote:My fourth grader scored 288 in MAP-R. He mostly reads nonfiction books and feels it is getting harder to find books in the library.
Please share the books your kids at a similar level are reading in any genre. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That report is from the samples, not from all the MCPS students. So it is possible that the max score in the report is not really the MAX.
It's at least 10,000 kids per grade in the sample (see first column in Table 5) --- all kids who took spring MAP-R and PARCC ELA that year. It's possible there's a kid who took MAP-R but not PARCC and isn't in the sample group, but the general idea still stands that a MAP-R of 288 in the spring of 4th grade would be an extreme outlier, both on the national norms (5.5 standard deviations above the mean using current norms, or one in 10 million) and within MCPS (4.6 SD above the mean using the data in that report, which is from 2014-15, or ~5 in a million).
I agree it's rare but I don't buy that MCPS is that much higher than the national norms based on the charts they've published. What are you looking at that indicates otherwise? The data in my child's map report shows the district average as being maybe 2%-3% higher than the national.
Yeah, in general I don't think there's a ton of difference between MCPS and the national norms, but I did the calculations by looking at the mean and standard deviations shown in the MCPS report compared to the ones reported nationally for the MAP tests.
For 4th grade spring MAP-R, the national 2015 mean/average (which would have been in place at the time of the MCPS report) was 205.9 with a standard deviation of 14.92 (data taken from here).
The mean from the MCPS report was 210.0 with a standard deviation of 16.78.
So the averages are just a few points difference, but with a wider standard deviation in MCPS, so when you get ~80 points above the average (as the OP claims), that makes a difference.
(I'm a scientist who likes data and clearly I have spent too much time over the past decade that my kids have been taking MAP tests in trying to interpret their scores!)
Still doesn't change the fact that it is an incredibly rare score and, if accurate, something the OP should be discussing with the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader got a 230 something (can’t remember exactly—236 I think), and they don’t actually read books outside of the William & Mary books assigned at school and whatever library books they read at school when killing time. They do read a lot of content online related to their hobby/passion along with news articles (most short).
I was a bookworm as a kid, but I hated most of the classics. I read garbage. Shrug.
When DC was in 4th they also scored 236 that winter but after spending the latter part of the year in DL and 5th in DL their score in the beginning of 6th is still around 236.
The test changes in 6th grade, so many scores go down slightly between 5th and 6th. But I'm sure virtual learning last year didn't help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just get him a library card and turn him loose.
Seconded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader got a 230 something (can’t remember exactly—236 I think), and they don’t actually read books outside of the William & Mary books assigned at school and whatever library books they read at school when killing time. They do read a lot of content online related to their hobby/passion along with news articles (most short).
I was a bookworm as a kid, but I hated most of the classics. I read garbage. Shrug.
High five for Christopher Pike and Sweet Valley High
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader got a 230 something (can’t remember exactly—236 I think), and they don’t actually read books outside of the William & Mary books assigned at school and whatever library books they read at school when killing time. They do read a lot of content online related to their hobby/passion along with news articles (most short).
I was a bookworm as a kid, but I hated most of the classics. I read garbage. Shrug.
When DC was in 4th they also scored 236 that winter but after spending the latter part of the year in DL and 5th in DL their score in the beginning of 6th is still around 236.
Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader got a 230 something (can’t remember exactly—236 I think), and they don’t actually read books outside of the William & Mary books assigned at school and whatever library books they read at school when killing time. They do read a lot of content online related to their hobby/passion along with news articles (most short).
I was a bookworm as a kid, but I hated most of the classics. I read garbage. Shrug.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That report is from the samples, not from all the MCPS students. So it is possible that the max score in the report is not really the MAX.
It's at least 10,000 kids per grade in the sample (see first column in Table 5) --- all kids who took spring MAP-R and PARCC ELA that year. It's possible there's a kid who took MAP-R but not PARCC and isn't in the sample group, but the general idea still stands that a MAP-R of 288 in the spring of 4th grade would be an extreme outlier, both on the national norms (5.5 standard deviations above the mean using current norms, or one in 10 million) and within MCPS (4.6 SD above the mean using the data in that report, which is from 2014-15, or ~5 in a million).
I agree it's rare but I don't buy that MCPS is that much higher than the national norms based on the charts they've published. What are you looking at that indicates otherwise? The data in my child's map report shows the district average as being maybe 2%-3% higher than the national.