Anonymous wrote:100% do NOT meet with them. Absolutely not. Same with the children.
Anonymous wrote:NP. Meeting the other parents may or may not be productive but it won't be traumatizing. The children won't be there. I don't see the harm.
I agree that I don't think it will be useful. But I'm wrong a lot. I'd go, prepared to listen and to keep my mouth closed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:100% do NOT meet with them. Absolutely not. Same with the children.
But this defeats the goal of restorative justice.
I think the ethical thing to do, OP, is to honor the school’s (and the other parents) request; don’t you agree?
Restorative justice can only work if people give it a chance.
What’s the worst that could happen?
Anonymous wrote:100% do NOT meet with them. Absolutely not. Same with the children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, this meeting is very likely for the school's benefit, not yours, not the other family's, not the kids'. As a PP already said, it will allow the school to say, we got the parents together, it was amicable, families at this school talk things out, we're proactive about facilitating discussion here, etc. That's not about your child, it's about the school wanting to create a record that it had this meeting.
+1 OP if the school failed your child, tell them. And if they try to waste your time creating a record to benefit themselves, feel free to leave. Don't worry about the bullying child's parents. The school probably failed their child too.
Anonymous wrote:OP, this meeting is very likely for the school's benefit, not yours, not the other family's, not the kids'. As a PP already said, it will allow the school to say, we got the parents together, it was amicable, families at this school talk things out, we're proactive about facilitating discussion here, etc. That's not about your child, it's about the school wanting to create a record that it had this meeting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would probably go just because I’d be curious as to what they have to say, but that’s just me. I’d also keep my own mouth shut and not saying anything more than some sort of non-committal generalities.
You’re curiosity needs to be left out. That is ridiculous and not the goal.
DP, but I have no clue what you mean here. I too would likely go because I was curious—nothing ridiculous about that—and also because there is a chance it could be constructive. The goal is having a bullying-free remainder of the school year, and the additional information that might come up at the meeting could be helpful in achieving that goal. Since OP and her kid won’t be part of the school community next year, I see little potential for harm.
Leaving is all the more reason why OP doesn’t need to meet. You are naive and foolish. This is not appropriate.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Gosh, I wish I had posted before, but we already agreed to the meeting (just the adults, not the kids).
What's the harm in meeting? I'm not sure why so many are adamantly against it; maybe that's my naivete because we've never been in this situation before.
It's a public school and it's the school's idea to have the meeting. The school seems to agree that our child is being bullied. At least, in the correspondence we've had back and forth, at least twice a teacher has said that they didn't see the incident my child was complaining of, but have no doubt it's true due to previous bullying. This particular person has had conflict with several other kids.
So we've already agreed to this, anything we should look out for? I'm not worried about our being bullied or blamed; we are able to stand up for ourselves as needed.
Anonymous wrote:OP, do not do this. There's absolutely no way it will benefit your child. Send a polite but firm email declining the meeting.