Anonymous wrote:My kid is going to Georgetown and I remember thinking, wow, it is harder to get into Georgetown today (12% acceptance rate) than it was to get into Harvard in 1987 (the year I applied). Back then, I think the Harvard acceptance rate was around 16%.
None of us would ever get into our alma maters today, folks....!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 1989 I got rejected from Yale, Princeton and Williams with a straight A average, 1390 SAT and at top prep school. So yes, it was tough then too.
No one with those stats would even consider applying to those colleges today with those stats. Not good enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 1989 my best friend in HS was a straight A student in top classes, STEM, Humanities and Arts. She had almost a perfect score on her SATs.
Her college applications went out to 9 places including Ivies and high ranking California colleges. She was rejected from everywhere except her safety, BU. And that's where she went.
I think she must have done poorly with the essay or her counselor recommendations. Back then 9 colleges was a LOT of colleges to apply to. It would have been hard to write so many essays. Also, was she "well rounded"? That was very big back then... you didn't mention anything but academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 1989 my best friend in HS was a straight A student in top classes, STEM, Humanities and Arts. She had almost a perfect score on her SATs.
Her college applications went out to 9 places including Ivies and high ranking California colleges. She was rejected from everywhere except her safety, BU. And that's where she went.
I think she must have done poorly with the essay or her counselor recommendations. Back then 9 colleges was a LOT of colleges to apply to. It would have been hard to write so many essays. Also, was she "well rounded"? That was very big back then... you didn't mention anything but academics.
Anonymous wrote:In 1989 I got rejected from Yale, Princeton and Williams with a straight A average, 1390 SAT and at top prep school. So yes, it was tough then too.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is going to Georgetown and I remember thinking, wow, it is harder to get into Georgetown today (12% acceptance rate) than it was to get into Harvard in 1987 (the year I applied). Back then, I think the Harvard acceptance rate was around 16%.
None of us would ever get into our alma maters today, folks....!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In 1989 I got rejected from Yale, Princeton and Williams with a straight A average, 1390 SAT and at top prep school. So yes, it was tough then too.
The SAT used a 2400 point scale in 1989 and that would be equivalent to a 1000 on the current sat
you’re not smart enough to create a believable lie
Anonymous wrote:In 1989 my best friend in HS was a straight A student in top classes, STEM, Humanities and Arts. She had almost a perfect score on her SATs.
Her college applications went out to 9 places including Ivies and high ranking California colleges. She was rejected from everywhere except her safety, BU. And that's where she went.
Anonymous wrote:I got into Yale and Univ of Penn in the late 1980s with a 1380 SAT and zero AP classes. (My school didn’t offer any.) I may well have been the first kid from my high school to ever apply to either. I couldn’t afford to go and had no one to advise me on financial aid, so I declined both and went to a state university instead.
Last year, my oldest was one of many highly qualified students to be rejected from both of the Ivies I got into, and we had a good laugh about the lost legacy preference. She is now at a state school as well, but one with a much better reputation than the one I attended!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister got into Vanderbilt with an 1100 on the SAT's. Those were the days. Can you even imagine that now?
For kids with the right hook, yes. I wouldn't overestimate Vanderbilt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister got into Vanderbilt with an 1100 on the SAT's. Those were the days. Can you even imagine that now?
For kids with the right hook, yes. I wouldn't overestimate Vanderbilt.