Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: democrats seem to not care that sick and or special needs babies and adults are unable to find the food they need to sustain their lives.
No, we don't care you're paying more to feed the babies you insist we all have. Babies are expensive. Get used to it. Put some miles and gas in those cars and go formula hunting. It builds character.
Anonymous wrote: democrats seem to not care that sick and or special needs babies and adults are unable to find the food they need to sustain their lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A law must be passed that all lactating women must feed starving babies upon demand. Their bodies must continue to be used to sustain life indefinitely. We're getting into some real grapes of wrath here.....
Just stop with the stupid, snarky comments.
This is a huge issue right now.... for babies who cannot take traditional formula, for mothers unable to nurse, and even for some older children and adults with digestive issues.
And, Biden, et al, are silent.
Anonymous wrote:A law must be passed that all lactating women must feed starving babies upon demand. Their bodies must continue to be used to sustain life indefinitely. We're getting into some real grapes of wrath here.....
Anonymous wrote:A law must be passed that all lactating women must feed starving babies upon demand. Their bodies must continue to be used to sustain life indefinitely. We're getting into some real grapes of wrath here.....
Anonymous wrote:A law must be passed that all lactating women must feed starving babies upon demand. Their bodies must continue to be used to sustain life indefinitely. We're getting into some real grapes of wrath here.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would strongly support the government making or ensuring a steady supply of any lifesaving formula or drug for which a market failure can mean death to thousands. But most people would call that “socialist” so we can’t do that. “Pro life” and “saving babies” only has meaning when someone gets to profit from it, apparently.
When has this been proposed, who called it socialist and said it couldn't happen? Or are you just throwing your own imaginary nonsense out there? Are you actually doing something about this? Or do you prefer cowering in your made-up world of fear?
Anonymous wrote:This is so easy. He can just move to a state where there's plenty of food
Or file a lawsuit against a lactating woman. So the supreme Court can rule that that any lactating woman must now feed all of the starving children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like acid reflux or super rare? Certainly tough to live or raise a child with a rare medical condition.
Super rare.
It’s been a big issue discussed in parenting groups.
I hope the FDA/Biden can step in. But I like a strong gov’t and all of that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would strongly support the government making or ensuring a steady supply of any lifesaving formula or drug for which a market failure can mean death to thousands. But most people would call that “socialist” so we can’t do that. “Pro life” and “saving babies” only has meaning when someone gets to profit from it, apparently.
When has this been proposed, who called it socialist and said it couldn't happen? Or are you just throwing your own imaginary nonsense out there? Are you actually doing something about this? Or do you prefer cowering in your made-up world of fear?