Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People see it as unfair because of parents who game the system without a real need for the child but for unfair advantage. It’s a regular scam, often used for athletes but not limited to them.
This is the problem with it. I don't think people are upset with kids getting extra time who legitimately need extra time. It is akin to parking in a handicapped spot when you don't have a real need for it, but you nevertheless have a handicapped hangtag. You're permitted to do so, but you're not who it is intended for and your ability to game the system frustrates others.
(And I hope you know by "you" I don't mean you, personally.
This. I don’t begrudge kids who actually need the extra time. What pisses me off are the kids who don’t, but whose parents paid several thousand dollars for a phony evaluation saying they do. The SAT/ACT/AP exams should have a notation indicating that the student received extra time. Maybe then only the kids who actually need it would use it.
But how does that work for the kids that have disabilities? They have a scarlet D. I think it’s harder than folks realize to get accommodations. We submitted a neuropsych report and a school report indicating that our child uses accommodations at school. So if people are faking, the schools are complicit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People see it as unfair because of parents who game the system without a real need for the child but for unfair advantage. It’s a regular scam, often used for athletes but not limited to them.
This is the problem with it. I don't think people are upset with kids getting extra time who legitimately need extra time. It is akin to parking in a handicapped spot when you don't have a real need for it, but you nevertheless have a handicapped hangtag. You're permitted to do so, but you're not who it is intended for and your ability to game the system frustrates others.
(And I hope you know by "you" I don't mean you, personally.
This. I don’t begrudge kids who actually need the extra time. What pisses me off are the kids who don’t, but whose parents paid several thousand dollars for a phony evaluation saying they do. The SAT/ACT/AP exams should have a notation indicating that the student received extra time. Maybe then only the kids who actually need it would use it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People see it as unfair because of parents who game the system without a real need for the child but for unfair advantage. It’s a regular scam, often used for athletes but not limited to them.
This is the problem with it. I don't think people are upset with kids getting extra time who legitimately need extra time. It is akin to parking in a handicapped spot when you don't have a real need for it, but you nevertheless have a handicapped hangtag. You're permitted to do so, but you're not who it is intended for and your ability to game the system frustrates others.
(And I hope you know by "you" I don't mean you, personally.
Anonymous wrote:i think part of the issue is that the amount of extra time is not determined with any sort of thought. if kids without extra time are having trouble finishing an exam in the time allotted because of the length and/or difficulty and a student with extra time gets 2x the amount time and has no problem finishing, is that fair or not? Maybe that student should only get 1.5x or 1.25x amount of time.
Anonymous wrote:What happens when these kids make it through college (presumably with accommodations) and then enter the working world? I'm not aware of employers making accommodations.
Anonymous wrote:People see it as unfair because of parents who game the system without a real need for the child but for unfair advantage. It’s a regular scam, often used for athletes but not limited to them.[/quote
If the need for extra time is legit, then fine.
Rich people tend to use this accomodation a lot, gaming the system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happens when these kids make it through college (presumably with accommodations) and then enter the working world? I'm not aware of employers making accommodations.
+1
Anonymous wrote:What happens when these kids make it through college (presumably with accommodations) and then enter the working world? I'm not aware of employers making accommodations.
Anonymous wrote:Once they were presented with timed exams that were between hard and impossible to finish, lots of law students discovered that they had ADHD. A little research, an appointment with a psychiatrist and you not only get enough time to finish, you also get medicine to help you study
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happens when these kids make it through college (presumably with accommodations) and then enter the working world? I'm not aware of employers making accommodations.
They do not function in the real world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happens when these kids make it through college (presumably with accommodations) and then enter the working world? I'm not aware of employers making accommodations.
Many will not need accommodations when they are not within the very strict constraints of the school system. Work will give them the opportunity to shine at what they are good at.