Anonymous wrote:There is way too much testing. I work at a high school and if parents could just see the amount of time, effort and expense that goes into testing, they would be shocked. It affects everyone and we have two full time administrators who are unable to work on anything else but testing. They are highly competent people but they are super stressed out with testing and cannot help the school with anything else. Others including teachers get pulled in as well. If we could redirect these resources to improving teaching and learning, kids would be a lot better off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Save your money and do private school
Again with the backdoor recruiting. Privates must be struggling to hit recruitment targets.
Anonymous wrote:Save your money and do private school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the purpose of MCAPs? To get individual data on the progress of each kid? Or assess the effectiveness of the school’s teaching on a broader level?
I wish they could simply use MAP and reduce the amount of testing. I mean even taking MAP-M/R 3 times per year seems excessive and I'm all for accountability.
My thoughts exactly. They all take map anyway, why can't that be the statewide assessment?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the purpose of MCAPs? To get individual data on the progress of each kid? Or assess the effectiveness of the school’s teaching on a broader level?
I wish they could simply use MAP and reduce the amount of testing. I mean even taking MAP-M/R 3 times per year seems excessive and I'm all for accountability.
Anonymous wrote:Add to the madness that elementary students will see geometry questions on the test (they are on the practice tests) and yet MCPS has removed the geometry units from the Eureka Curriculum. (In 4th grade, geometry is unit 4. This unit is not taught. Similar with 3rd and 5th grades.) MCPS says don’t teach it, and yet students will see geometry questions on MCAP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the purpose of MCAPs? To get individual data on the progress of each kid? Or assess the effectiveness of the school’s teaching on a broader level?
Good questions. It cannot be the first one since the result is not known until 5 months later. How could this test benefit the students?
It doesn't. It is a report card for the school. However, it really is a mirror for the school's demographics. There was an article years ago about how schools could easily be ranked based on parental income level. Researchers ranked them and surprise, surprise. The results of the testing almost exactly fell along the lines of parental income. It isn't rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the purpose of MCAPs? To get individual data on the progress of each kid? Or assess the effectiveness of the school’s teaching on a broader level?
Good questions. It cannot be the first one since the result is not known until 5 months later. How could this test benefit the students?
It doesn't. It is a report card for the school. However, it really is a mirror for the school's demographics. There was an article years ago about how schools could easily be ranked based on parental income level. Researchers ranked them and surprise, surprise. The results of the testing almost exactly fell along the lines of parental income. It isn't rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the purpose of MCAPs? To get individual data on the progress of each kid? Or assess the effectiveness of the school’s teaching on a broader level?
Good questions. It cannot be the first one since the result is not known until 5 months later. How could this test benefit the students?
Anonymous wrote:I absolutely agree there’s too much testing.
And I hope they everyone who agrees will quit obsessing over how schools are “ranked” based on that testing.