Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.
This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.
While it may change tomorrow, as of right now, the new admissions policy is legal, likely to be found constitutional, and is proceeding.
It has not been determined to be legal. It was found to be unconstitutional. For the moment the SB got a stay on the order forbidding them to use the new admissions policy but the stay does not rule on the merits of the case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.
This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.
While it may change tomorrow, as of right now, the new admissions policy is legal, likely to be found constitutional, and is proceeding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.
This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.
You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.
The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling
The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.
You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.
The court order said absolutely nothing about following the original admissions process (which, as others pointed out, would be impossible) nor did it indicate which aspects of the new process were enjoined from further use.
Essentially all Judge Hilton said (read the order) is "The motivation behind changing admissions processes was impermissibly racist and you can't use the new process to select the next class." He said nothing else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.
No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.
Stop being a racist to a minority woman.
Funny how Asra is quick to pull out the racist card anytime anyone calls out her bullsh1t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.
No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.
Stop being a racist to a minority woman.
Funny how Asra is quick to pull out the racist card anytime anyone calls out her bullsh1t.
You are spreading disinformation Putin puppet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
Is anyone suing TJAAG for starting all this mess in the first place?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.
No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.
Stop being a racist to a minority woman.
Funny how Asra is quick to pull out the racist card anytime anyone calls out her bullsh1t.
Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.
You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.
The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling
The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.
You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.
You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.
The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling
The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.
You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.
You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.
The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?
My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?
Shut up and get out of the way.
Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.
No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.
Stop being a racist to a minority woman.