Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are so far left it's actually pretty funny reading your unhinged, nonsense posts. OP - how about some actual links or examples of what you're outraged about? What bills did he veto?

Oh, is your Google broken? Not OP, but this was the first hit when I searched “Youngkin vetos”: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/04/12/youngkin-veto-general-assembly-loudoun-schools/

It provides examples of bills with broad bipartisan support vetoed by Youngkin and statistics on how not only is Youngkin being very aggressive in his vetos and amendments, but also how he is using them to target Democrats in the General Assembly, at times in very petty and vindictive ways.

Are you new here? When someone starts a thread, the expectation is that that OP will provide relevant links and not just throw out some random words.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, selective outrage. If he doesn't sign a bill it automatically becomes law 30 days after adjournment. Many to most states are like this.

People, at least know the facts before you start reposting misinformation. You are part of the problem!

So he is behaving differently than any other previous governor but it's "selective" outrage.

Oh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is vetoing a record number of bills passed by the General Assembly and has unilaterally changed the schedule for the Loudoun SB elections.

I agree that unilaterally doesn't mean what you think it is means. It's up for a vote now - the exact opposite of unilateral.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are so far left it's actually pretty funny reading your unhinged, nonsense posts. OP - how about some actual links or examples of what you're outraged about? What bills did he veto?

Oh, is your Google broken? Not OP, but this was the first hit when I searched “Youngkin vetos”: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/04/12/youngkin-veto-general-assembly-loudoun-schools/

It provides examples of bills with broad bipartisan support vetoed by Youngkin and statistics on how not only is Youngkin being very aggressive in his vetos and amendments, but also how he is using them to target Democrats in the General Assembly, at times in very petty and vindictive ways.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, selective outrage. If he doesn't sign a bill it automatically becomes law 30 days after adjournment. Many to most states are like this.

People, at least know the facts before you start reposting misinformation. You are part of the problem!

So he is behaving differently than any other previous governor but it's "selective" outrage.

Oh.

Oh please I remember Northam signing the SB1303 guaranteeing in person school on the very last day.
Andplusalso - the Ds are no better. Youngkin is basically doing payback for the Ds not approving one of his cabinet selections which they historically just rubber stamp - and so the Ds also behaving differently as well.

It’s really becoming clear to me that the difference between the Rs and the Ds is the difference between gonorrhea and chlamydia.

Dems opposed one nominee who was wholly unfit and approved lots of others without incident. That’s a little different from what Youngkin is doing.

What exactly is he doing - signing one version of a bill instead of both? It's the same result for citizens.

Custom and practice is for the governor to sign both versions, regardless of who sponsors them. Youngkin is signing the Republican-sponsored House versions while vetoing the Dem-sponsored Senate versions so the Republican sponsors can claim credit and the Democratic sponsors can’t. It is rank partisan politics, and highly divisive. Definitely not he behavior of someone who is trying to a uniter as Youngkin claimed he would be. He’s petty and vindictive, which are not good traits in a leader.

Anonymous wrote:Yawn.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe he’s vetoing them without even bothering to read them?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, selective outrage. If he doesn't sign a bill it automatically becomes law 30 days after adjournment. Many to most states are like this.

People, at least know the facts before you start reposting misinformation. You are part of the problem!

So he is behaving differently than any other previous governor but it's "selective" outrage.

Oh.

Oh please I remember Northam signing the SB1303 guaranteeing in person school on the very last day.
Andplusalso - the Ds are no better. Youngkin is basically doing payback for the Ds not approving one of his cabinet selections which they historically just rubber stamp - and so the Ds also behaving differently as well.

It’s really becoming clear to me that the difference between the Rs and the Ds is the difference between gonorrhea and chlamydia.

Dems opposed one nominee who was wholly unfit and approved lots of others without incident. That’s a little different from what Youngkin is doing.

What exactly is he doing - signing one version of a bill instead of both? It's the same result for citizens.

Custom and practice is for the governor to sign both versions, regardless of who sponsors them. Youngkin is signing the Republican-sponsored House versions while vetoing the Dem-sponsored Senate versions so the Republican sponsors can claim credit and the Democratic sponsors can’t. It is rank partisan politics, and highly divisive. Definitely not he behavior of someone who is trying to a uniter as Youngkin claimed he would be. He’s petty and vindictive, which are not good traits in a leader.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, selective outrage. If he doesn't sign a bill it automatically becomes law 30 days after adjournment. Many to most states are like this.

People, at least know the facts before you start reposting misinformation. You are part of the problem!

So he is behaving differently than any other previous governor but it's "selective" outrage.

Oh.

Oh please I remember Northam signing the SB1303 guaranteeing in person school on the very last day.
Andplusalso - the Ds are no better. Youngkin is basically doing payback for the Ds not approving one of his cabinet selections which they historically just rubber stamp - and so the Ds also behaving differently as well.

It’s really becoming clear to me that the difference between the Rs and the Ds is the difference between gonorrhea and chlamydia.

Dems opposed one nominee who was wholly unfit and approved lots of others without incident. That’s a little different from what Youngkin is doing.

What exactly is he doing - signing one version of a bill instead of both? It's the same result for citizens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is “behaving differently,” stop lying and calling this business as usual.

Like I said above, I see you and raise you:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/04/12/youngkin-veto-general-assembly-loudoun-schools/

The vetoes were widely seen as payback for Senate Democrats’ refusal to confirm a handful of Youngkin appointments, starting with their rejection of a Trump administration official for the governor’s Cabinet. Ebbin, as chairman of the Senate committee that handles appointments, has been at the center of those appointment battles.

In early February, the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee rejected Andrew Wheeler, Youngkin’s pick for secretary of natural and historic resources. Virginia’s General Assembly rarely snubs a governor’s Cabinet nominee, but the Democrats strenuously objected to Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist who led a rollback of Obama-era environmental regulations as President Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency chief.

Anonymous wrote:What a shitty governor.