Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not complaining. The fact we don't have to pay on my husband's student loans means we've been able to pay cash for our college student (and we don't get a break on tuition). Which means our college student is not going to have loans. So that's a win for everyone as far as I'm concerned.

Not for the taxpayers. There's no way I'm voting for a Democrat in 2022 or 2024 because of this kind of thing. -Biden Voter in '20

You are going to vote for a hateful bigot criminal who tried to overthrow an election because Biden is giving borrowers a break?!

Yawn. Would I vote from Trump? No. Will Trump be the nominee again? Probably not. Will I vote for 90% of other Republicans for president because of inflation? Yes. Would I vote for Larry Hogan? Yes and I would give him donations.

Anonymous wrote:Why do you care?

Because I pay taxes?

Why do you care?

I agree with you, OP. My husband and I are both in PSLF, so this program has effectively meant $2,000 that we don’t pay each month times 2+ years and it’s still counting toward our PSLF. We are UMC and this program makes no sense to us. It absolutely drives inflation as well. At dinner today my husband and I were remarking how ridiculous it is that the child tax credit payments were allowed to expire but this program helping a family making $350k HHI is being lauded by progressives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should've just extended to January 2023. Pretty dumb to restart loan payments right before midterms.

You can’t take back an extension once committed. Shorter gives him wiggle room.

The extension ending on Sept 1 gives them the opportunity to apply some form of forgiveness right before the midterms.

Let's see if they have the guts to do it.

More likely another extension through year end.

But why not just do that now? Seems silly to waffle around in August and build up anxiety about whether or not it will be extended. Further, it would be political idiocy to restart loan payments right before the Midterms.

My guess is that they will offer a form of loan forgiveness in September. Probably income-tested and only for a nominal amount like $10-15K.

They will either extend or forgive in August. If he did it now it won’t be at the top of peoples minds by November.

Student loan forgiveness is very unpopular. I think it would be the final nail in the coffin for the Democrats.

Can you imagine the anti-Dem political ads? Videos of frat parties, spring break shenanigans, and college hipsters sipping lattes followed by the statement "your tax dollars paid for this while inflation runs rampant."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should've just extended to January 2023. Pretty dumb to restart loan payments right before midterms.

You can’t take back an extension once committed. Shorter gives him wiggle room.

The extension ending on Sept 1 gives them the opportunity to apply some form of forgiveness right before the midterms.

Let's see if they have the guts to do it.

More likely another extension through year end.

But why not just do that now? Seems silly to waffle around in August and build up anxiety about whether or not it will be extended. Further, it would be political idiocy to restart loan payments right before the Midterms.

My guess is that they will offer a form of loan forgiveness in September. Probably income-tested and only for a nominal amount like $10-15K.

They will either extend or forgive in August. If he did it now it won’t be at the top of peoples minds by November.

Student loan forgiveness is very unpopular. I think it would be the final nail in the coffin for the Democrats.

Millions in student loans have already been forgiven through Borrowers Defense and PSLF.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should've just extended to January 2023. Pretty dumb to restart loan payments right before midterms.

You can’t take back an extension once committed. Shorter gives him wiggle room.

The extension ending on Sept 1 gives them the opportunity to apply some form of forgiveness right before the midterms.

Let's see if they have the guts to do it.

More likely another extension through year end.

But why not just do that now? Seems silly to waffle around in August and build up anxiety about whether or not it will be extended. Further, it would be political idiocy to restart loan payments right before the Midterms.

My guess is that they will offer a form of loan forgiveness in September. Probably income-tested and only for a nominal amount like $10-15K.

They will either extend or forgive in August. If he did it now it won’t be at the top of peoples minds by November.

Student loan forgiveness is very unpopular. I think it would be the final nail in the coffin for the Democrats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People complaining about this are actively participating in class warfare.

By class warfare, do you me a regressive wealth transfer to the wealthy? Because that is what a student loan repayment pause is.

I love how progressives simply ignore this fact.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should've just extended to January 2023. Pretty dumb to restart loan payments right before midterms.

You can’t take back an extension once committed. Shorter gives him wiggle room.

No, not dumb. It will be extended again and he'll be able to get a lot of good press on it in September right before the election.

“Good press” in the sense that extending the repayment pause will make the people who were already going to vote for him happy?

I think its going to piss off as many people (or more) than it makes happy. And the people it pisses off actually pay substantial taxes, unlike the deadbeat freeloaders.

Liberty University is the largest single issuer of federal student loans.

Are you saying the conservative families who send their kids to those schools and are benefitting the most from these programs are “deadbeat freeloaders”?

Yes. They were voting R anyway and most weren’t getting good jobs coming from Liberty. And the women probably don’t want to work at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should've just extended to January 2023. Pretty dumb to restart loan payments right before midterms.

You can’t take back an extension once committed. Shorter gives him wiggle room.

No, not dumb. It will be extended again and he'll be able to get a lot of good press on it in September right before the election.

“Good press” in the sense that extending the repayment pause will make the people who were already going to vote for him happy?

I think its going to piss off as many people (or more) than it makes happy. And the people it pisses off actually pay substantial taxes, unlike the deadbeat freeloaders.

Liberty University is the largest single issuer of federal student loans.

Are you saying the conservative families who send their kids to those schools and are benefitting the most from these programs are “deadbeat freeloaders”?

Yes?

And, unfortunately, Liberty University alumni are one of the most reliably red blocs of the Republican party's low-information constituency.

Anonymous wrote:People complaining about this are actively participating in class warfare.

By class warfare, do you me a regressive wealth transfer to the wealthy? Because that is what a student loan repayment pause is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not complaining. The fact we don't have to pay on my husband's student loans means we've been able to pay cash for our college student (and we don't get a break on tuition). Which means our college student is not going to have loans. So that's a win for everyone as far as I'm concerned.

Not for the taxpayers. There's no way I'm voting for a Democrat in 2022 or 2024 because of this kind of thing. -Biden Voter in '20

You are going to vote for a hateful bigot criminal who tried to overthrow an election because Biden is giving borrowers a break?!

People complaining about this are actively participating in class warfare.

Anonymous wrote:I'm not complaining. The fact we don't have to pay on my husband's student loans means we've been able to pay cash for our college student (and we don't get a break on tuition). Which means our college student is not going to have loans. So that's a win for everyone as far as I'm concerned.

Not for the taxpayers. There's no way I'm voting for a Democrat in 2022 or 2024 because of this kind of thing. -Biden Voter in '20

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should've just extended to January 2023. Pretty dumb to restart loan payments right before midterms.

You can’t take back an extension once committed. Shorter gives him wiggle room.

No, not dumb. It will be extended again and he'll be able to get a lot of good press on it in September right before the election.

“Good press” in the sense that extending the repayment pause will make the people who were already going to vote for him happy?

I think its going to piss off as many people (or more) than it makes happy. And the people it pisses off actually pay substantial taxes, unlike the deadbeat freeloaders.

Liberty University is the largest single issuer of federal student loans.

Are you saying the conservative families who send their kids to those schools and are benefitting the most from these programs are “deadbeat freeloaders”?

Yes?