Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't bring a sibling who has not been invited. Full stop.
It is actually important for siblings who were not invited to learn how to deal with not being invited. Also, it teaches siblings to deal with the fact that their brother or sister have their own friends. It is a way of teaching boundaries. I have watched moms argue that both their kids should go to a party when only one was invited because they want to "always keep things equal forever" between their kids. That is delusional thinking.
True but as others have stated sometimes it’s just a matter if practicality. I have a 3.5 yr old and 1.5 year old. It’s not a drop off party and I don’t have anyone to watch the 1.5 year old most weekends. DW is an ER nurse and has to work many weekends. We just don’t go to the party.
Anonymous wrote:You don't bring a sibling who has not been invited. Full stop.
It is actually important for siblings who were not invited to learn how to deal with not being invited. Also, it teaches siblings to deal with the fact that their brother or sister have their own friends. It is a way of teaching boundaries. I have watched moms argue that both their kids should go to a party when only one was invited because they want to "always keep things equal forever" between their kids. That is delusional thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hosting a party this weekend and someone asked to bring a sibling. I can assure you it’s not appreciated. The fact that people continue to do this doesn’t mean it’s not rude.
Did you agree?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always rsvp no to any party that doesn’t include siblings. DH works on weekends and I’m not hiring a babysitter for a birthday party.
+1. Same. We just decline. If DS was old enough for a drop off party it would be fine but he isn’t so we don’t go. I work and have a nanny all week and don’t want to leave my youngest with a babysitter again.
That’s fine. No one is upset if you don’t come.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always rsvp no to any party that doesn’t include siblings. DH works on weekends and I’m not hiring a babysitter for a birthday party.
+1. Same. We just decline. If DS was old enough for a drop off party it would be fine but he isn’t so we don’t go. I work and have a nanny all week and don’t want to leave my youngest with a babysitter again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always rsvp no to any party that doesn’t include siblings. DH works on weekends and I’m not hiring a babysitter for a birthday party.
+1. Same. We just decline. If DS was old enough for a drop off party it would be fine but he isn’t so we don’t go. I work and have a nanny all week and don’t want to leave my youngest with a babysitter again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to infants? Bringing my four year old to a party and was planning on bringing my 3 month old (needs to breastfeed) and wearing her the whole time. Never crossed my mind to ask the host.
Use some common sense, an infant isn’t using any of the party resources. It’s fine. We’re discussing mobile siblings.
Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to infants? Bringing my four year old to a party and was planning on bringing my 3 month old (needs to breastfeed) and wearing her the whole time. Never crossed my mind to ask the host.
Anonymous wrote:Hosting a party this weekend and someone asked to bring a sibling. I can assure you it’s not appreciated. The fact that people continue to do this doesn’t mean it’s not rude.
Anonymous wrote:We always rsvp no to any party that doesn’t include siblings. DH works on weekends and I’m not hiring a babysitter for a birthday party.