Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.
Not unlike yourself.
Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.
DP
Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.
Not unlike yourself.
Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
I care. And clearly she cares otherwise she wouldn’t be lying. She’s a woman who soaks up our tax dollars, perpetuates a fascist, misogynistic, and racist platform, and continues to misrepresent herself for no reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
I care. And clearly she cares otherwise she wouldn’t be lying. She’s a woman who soaks up our tax dollars, perpetuates a fascist, misogynistic, and racist platform, and continues to misrepresent herself for no reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soooo what!
Well, it’s just an incredible lie for no reason. She could just say she was “working as model” which I’m sure is true. They don’t have to say she was a successful fashion model because she simply wasn’t. It’s crazy because there are PHOTOS of successful fashion models. No one would care either way. So it’s just remarkable to create and maintain a fictional biography for no reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's cut Melania a break, she has earned every penny having to sleep with that fat, gross old nutter. She has paid in spades for her immoral choices. Her life must be hell.
Has she laid in spades? I don’t think so. She’s living the high life, prances around Mar a Lago, is revered by GOP Trump worshippers, her child and her parents are taken care of. This woman has no shame. She is a birther, FFS.
Would you trade places with her? Would you have sex with orange man? Would you like your kid to be special? Would you like to have Trump step children of the corn?
Anonymous wrote:Soooo what!