Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He was double-parking IN RUSH HOUR?
Right? For once, the cyclist is not the asshole here…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like more of an asshole problem than a cycling problem.
asshole and cyclist are synonyms
Yes, because no one driving a car has ever yelled at anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OP here, and no I wouldn’t just park my car in the middle of Pennsylvania Blvd! Ridiculous.
But the driver yesterday was double-parked in the bike lane because THAT’S where the double-parking lane IS. Where else was he supposed to stop? So now the driver was supposed to go out into the driving lane to leave a tunnel for cyclists? How would that be safe for anyone but maybe the cyclists so long as they’re seen? Or the driver is supposed to go round and round rush-hour Clarendon for 10 minutes to find a spot a 10-minute walk from CVS? To spend a half-hour for a 2-minute errand?? How does THAT make sense???
Bikes are another form of vehicles on the road. So cyclists need to deal with the challenges motorists face, or they need to stay on bike trails and off busy streets. Truck drivers need to make quick deliveries. Police officers need to make quick stops between calls to refresh and refuel. And drivers need to stop off after work to pick up a prescription. In a busy city, all will double-park for a few minutes. They put flashers on, you wait your turn, then you pull out and pass. If you can’t handle that, don’t bike and don’t drive.
I really really hope this is satire and that there aren't people who think that there is a double parking lane. The driver was being an a-hole but I bet even if you asked him he would had said he didn't care if he was blocking traffic, not that he thought he was allowed to stop there because it was the double parking lane.
A bike lane is not a double parking lane even more than a non bike lane or sidewalk is. You park where there is parking, yes, even if you have to drive ten minutes to find a space.
Anonymous wrote:
OP here, and no I wouldn’t just park my car in the middle of Pennsylvania Blvd! Ridiculous.
But the driver yesterday was double-parked in the bike lane because THAT’S where the double-parking lane IS. Where else was he supposed to stop? So now the driver was supposed to go out into the driving lane to leave a tunnel for cyclists? How would that be safe for anyone but maybe the cyclists so long as they’re seen? Or the driver is supposed to go round and round rush-hour Clarendon for 10 minutes to find a spot a 10-minute walk from CVS? To spend a half-hour for a 2-minute errand?? How does THAT make sense???
Bikes are another form of vehicles on the road. So cyclists need to deal with the challenges motorists face, or they need to stay on bike trails and off busy streets. Truck drivers need to make quick deliveries. Police officers need to make quick stops between calls to refresh and refuel. And drivers need to stop off after work to pick up a prescription. In a busy city, all will double-park for a few minutes. They put flashers on, you wait your turn, then you pull out and pass. If you can’t handle that, don’t bike and don’t drive.
Anonymous wrote:Agree ... There's no such thing as a "double parking lane" ...
I bike to work through DC most days ... drivers def park in the bike lane and I don't scream at them, I just go around ... that's just my temperament etc.
But treating the bike lane like your parking spot is wrong, just like treating a 'car lane' like your parking spot would be wrong, esp during rush hour when folks are trying to get by.
OP here, and no I wouldn’t just park my car in the middle of Pennsylvania Blvd! Ridiculous.
But the driver yesterday was double-parked in the bike lane because THAT’S where the double-parking lane IS. Where else was he supposed to stop? So now the driver was supposed to go out into the driving lane to leave a tunnel for cyclists? How would that be safe for anyone but maybe the cyclists so long as they’re seen? Or the driver is supposed to go round and round rush-hour Clarendon for 10 minutes to find a spot a 10-minute walk from CVS? To spend a half-hour for a 2-minute errand?? How does THAT make sense???