Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh man either on this thread or another someone mentioned Ready.gov updated in late February. Well folks, they updated again March 3rd, 2022.
https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion
It looks like they updated it to remove the social distancing and masking advice for fallout shelters. So, you know, glad they are up to date on the latest CDC directives!
Anonymous wrote:Girl bye. I actually have a good deal of anxiety and fear of dying but even I don’t care about nuclear attack. Because you aren’t outrunning it or surviving it. If it drops on DC, you’re done and you’ll be vaporized before you even know. I’m way more afraid of the mundane things that can kill me like a car accident or cancer where I’ll go slowly. A nuke? Whatever, like what am I gonna do about that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Virginia you need to be west of Winchester to not be evaporated or in an unsurvivable amount of radiation band.
South of dc gets the quantico and Norfolk impacts so that would be a bad area too.
Maryland is harder to figure out because ft Meade and nsa could have 10 weapons hit there but there which would make the state uninhabitable.
Those are all low level targets.
What are known high-level targets?
Anonymous wrote:Oh man either on this thread or another someone mentioned Ready.gov updated in late February. Well folks, they updated again March 3rd, 2022.
https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion
Anonymous wrote:Oh man either on this thread or another someone mentioned Ready.gov updated in late February. Well folks, they updated again March 3rd, 2022.
https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion
Anonymous wrote:lol drink some wine and hug my kids
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other cities, if bombed, would likely get an air burst detonation to maximize casualties, which means a wider damage radius, but lower fallout. The bombs dropped on DC and the Pentagon will be ground burst, because their job is to disrupt military command and control networks. That means a smaller blast radius but much, much worse fallout. Depending on prevailing winds, you'd be looking at a 10-50 mile plume of fallout deposition where no one would be able to leave their homes for 3-4 weeks or else they'd receive a lethal dose of radiation. That area would not be inhabitable again in our lifetimes. It'd be like the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
Personally, and I say this with all seriousness, if one nuke goes off in Europe, I'm getting on the next flight to Argentina, because the Northern Hemisphere is going to be in for some rough times, and huge swaths of it would become uninhabitable.
I'd be moving in with my in-laws in Chicago for sure. And I hate them so I don't say it lightly.
You probably wouldn't be safe there. Even though some on DCUM like to laugh about "fly-over" land, there are some valuable targets there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Virginia you need to be west of Winchester to not be evaporated or in an unsurvivable amount of radiation band.
South of dc gets the quantico and Norfolk impacts so that would be a bad area too.
Maryland is harder to figure out because ft Meade and nsa could have 10 weapons hit there but there which would make the state uninhabitable.
Those are all low level targets.
What are known high-level targets?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other cities, if bombed, would likely get an air burst detonation to maximize casualties, which means a wider damage radius, but lower fallout. The bombs dropped on DC and the Pentagon will be ground burst, because their job is to disrupt military command and control networks. That means a smaller blast radius but much, much worse fallout. Depending on prevailing winds, you'd be looking at a 10-50 mile plume of fallout deposition where no one would be able to leave their homes for 3-4 weeks or else they'd receive a lethal dose of radiation. That area would not be inhabitable again in our lifetimes. It'd be like the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
Personally, and I say this with all seriousness, if one nuke goes off in Europe, I'm getting on the next flight to Argentina, because the Northern Hemisphere is going to be in for some rough times, and huge swaths of it would become uninhabitable.
I'd be moving in with my in-laws in Chicago for sure. And I hate them so I don't say it lightly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Virginia you need to be west of Winchester to not be evaporated or in an unsurvivable amount of radiation band.
South of dc gets the quantico and Norfolk impacts so that would be a bad area too.
Maryland is harder to figure out because ft Meade and nsa could have 10 weapons hit there but there which would make the state uninhabitable.
Those are all low level targets.
What are known high-level targets?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Virginia you need to be west of Winchester to not be evaporated or in an unsurvivable amount of radiation band.
South of dc gets the quantico and Norfolk impacts so that would be a bad area too.
Maryland is harder to figure out because ft Meade and nsa could have 10 weapons hit there but there which would make the state uninhabitable.
Those are all low level targets.