Schultz will not be Md's next governor. Maryland just isn't going to ever do that, thank goodness. Md is a Democratic state.

Youngkin 100%

Ladies there is not one republican that is safe

They lied big lie if you want to keep voting vote dem ex republican never again

Not sure what people do not understand there are no legitimate republicans

The republican convention told you what you are voting for this is not hard they wrote it down

No womens right at all no rights for any minorities

Raising taxes not sure why anyone votes for that
Social security and Medicare toast

Most importantly up until the big lie we voted your vote counted that will no longer be the case

The whole Republican Party grabbed onto the grift of the big lie they broke our country we are not Russia at least not yet come 2024 bread lines no jobs for no reason it’s coming you all are too lazy to fight for democracy we are screwed

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will vote for her over a super-progressive Democrat. Any Republican governor will have to govern closer to the middle in this state. But a super-progressive General Assembly and Governor is a nightmare.

I like reform. Not revolution.

The only person who is like that is John King and he's not polling high. You're likely either getting Franchot (Conservative Democrat) or Moore (Pro-Business Democrat).

King is my favorite, unfortunately.

I understand what his impetus for running for Governor is as the first elected office he has run for in his life? Makes zero sense and furthermore, he’s never been involved in local politics or even leadership positions in his own community. He’s a beltway dude that happens to live in Maryland (after moving from NY to work for Obama) who is only running because he worked for Obama?

Who’s supporting his campaign? Gotta be the “school choice”, charter school folks. Doesn’t make any sense otherwise.

Much to my chagrin, Dan Cox is going to win the GOP primary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will vote for her over a super-progressive Democrat. Any Republican governor will have to govern closer to the middle in this state. But a super-progressive General Assembly and Governor is a nightmare.

I like reform. Not revolution.

The only person who is like that is John King and he's not polling high. You're likely either getting Franchot (Conservative Democrat) or Moore (Pro-Business Democrat).

King is my favorite, unfortunately.

Anonymous wrote:I will vote for her over a super-progressive Democrat. Any Republican governor will have to govern closer to the middle in this state. But a super-progressive General Assembly and Governor is a nightmare.

I like reform. Not revolution.

The only person who is like that is John King and he's not polling high. You're likely either getting Franchot (Conservative Democrat) or Moore (Pro-Business Democrat).

Anonymous wrote:This Roe decision means that her campaign is effectively over.

Agreed. She tried to restrict abortion when she was in the state legislature, and today's decision makes that matter a lot. The number of Democrats who would vote for her just went way down.

This Roe decision means that her campaign is effectively over.

I will vote for her over a super-progressive Democrat. Any Republican governor will have to govern closer to the middle in this state. But a super-progressive General Assembly and Governor is a nightmare.

I like reform. Not revolution.

Any word on how these two are responding to the SC news?

I'm now almost certain we will see a Governor Franchot by the end of the year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess we have our answer (spoiler alert: Youngkin): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcrhzgdm-8c

Ha, that’s a perfect ad. If that bothers you- I’m sure you were never gonna consider voting for the GOP anyway.

It’s a good ad. I’m not sure that going so strongly against masks is a good strategy. Maybe instead focusing on the mandate and choice would be better. But still a good ad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schulz was a right-wing Delegate who is now trying to exploit Hogan’s branding. She’s a weak candidate who will probably lose to Trump’s preferred candidate, Dan Cox, in the primary.

The closest candidate to Hogan is Peter Franchot, who is similarly willing to shift positions with the wind. I’m hoping the Democrats nominate Tom Perez. I’m an independent and was never a fan of Perez when he was at the DNC, but he’s the only candidate in either party who seems to care about workers.

I would bet a large sum of money that Schulz crushes Dan Cox.

Peter Franchot is nowhere near Hogan politically. Don't let his new turn as a faux fiscal conservative fool you. Hes been a TK liberal for 50+ years.

If Tom Perez cares so much about workers, why is labeled a union buster?

This x100. The PPPs comment is totally upside down.

Perez is most notable for working at a union busting law firm and his incompetence at DOL (judge overturned regulations because he didn’t follow procedures) and incompetence at DNC.

For people with any familiarity with state politics, Franchot is most notable for being a purely political, favor trading, nihilist that holds grudges. Just a classic old time Maryland politician. Which is not a compliment.

Dan Cox will probably win the Eastern Shore, but Schulz will clean up with Republican voters - particularly the lacrosse and swim team moms - in Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Howard and Frederick counties.

She’s going to easily walk over this uninspiring Democratic field, except maybe Franchot but that’s only because he has the statewide name recognition. Wes Moore and Aruna Miller could be formidable ticket, except his campaign seems to have lost momentum.

Anonymous wrote:I guess we have our answer (spoiler alert: Youngkin): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcrhzgdm-8c

Ha, that’s a perfect ad. If that bothers you- I’m sure you were never gonna consider voting for the GOP anyway.