Anonymous wrote:I’ll never forget holding that beautiful bright red Valentine’s Day cupcake in my three year old hands and thinking “Where in the hell is my themed napkin?”. Haunts me to this day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly I am DONE with stupid stuff like this. Themed napkins?! No. I will send in actual school supplies, Valentines to hand out and make sure they have costumes for the Halloween parade, but the rest needs to slide away.
I feel like women used to get tasked with all sorts of stupid stuff like this (notice she didn't text your husband). It needs to stop and they need to stop expecting women to be classroom volunteers too. Not everything needs to be a pinterest moment.
Just say no, it’s fine! Relax.
Oh I do. But the expectation that women still do all of this is there.
Anonymous wrote:I actually think "It's fine. We'll do without." is a pretty rude response after someone just told you they didn't get a note because their kid missed 2 weeks of school due to COVID. The correct response is "Oh, I'm so sorry to hear she's been sick. I didn't know. Hope everyone is well now!"
Personally, OP, I would have added that my DC had been hospitalized and NOT offered to run and get the stuff. Because, perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly I am DONE with stupid stuff like this. Themed napkins?! No. I will send in actual school supplies, Valentines to hand out and make sure they have costumes for the Halloween parade, but the rest needs to slide away.
I feel like women used to get tasked with all sorts of stupid stuff like this (notice she didn't text your husband). It needs to stop and they need to stop expecting women to be classroom volunteers too. Not everything needs to be a pinterest moment.
Just say no, it’s fine! Relax.
Anonymous wrote:Room moms should do sign ups anyway - it should be voluntary to bring stuff. Don't feel bad - you haven't done anything.
Anonymous wrote:“Didn’t get it. Sorry you didn’t have a plan B.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP seems like the type who expects to be coddled 24/7.
I do not see the snark here. Unless it’s because she didn’t fall all over herself saying “poor you”?
BS. If snark wasn’t intended there was no reason to send the text.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP seems like the type who expects to be coddled 24/7.
I do not see the snark here. Unless it’s because she didn’t fall all over herself saying “poor you”?
BS. If snark wasn’t intended there was no reason to send the text.
Anonymous wrote:OP seems like the type who expects to be coddled 24/7.
I do not see the snark here. Unless it’s because she didn’t fall all over herself saying “poor you”?