Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did she actually want you to transfer it to her, or did she want to be added onto the deed? Big difference.
she wanted me to give her the house as in she would own it.
Your wording is still unclear.
Was she asking to add her name to deed along with yours? This is what most people mean when they say they want to own their house.
Or was she asking that you transfer the deed to her name and she would take out a mortgage in her name only for the remaining balance?
Yes, OP, please answer this. Was she asking for you to not be on the deed? You seem to be dodging this question.
She wanted me off the deed. She wanted 100% ownership. She wanted me to give her the house. She said she deserved it.
DP. To be frank, I do not believe you.
Anonymous wrote:OP here,
Everyone one here appears to be missing the point and simply focusing on why a wife should be on the deed, in part because its humiliating not to.
I didn't meet her until I was in my 40s and everything I had I earned on my own.
Had I met her when I was young and broke and we built everything together then she would have been on every title and deed.
Unfortunately; I understand divorce law and was/am rightfully concerned about losing everything in a no-fault divorce proceeding at an age where I simply can't rebuild.
If a woman doesn't comingle her assets its simply considered wise for her to protect herself. Apparently if a man protects himself he is unsuitable for marriage.
I didn't ask her to comingle any of her assets because I wasn't with her for her money.
She was the beneficiary of everything.
Here is the point:
If its humiliating for a woman not to be on the deed of a house that was purchased prior to marriage, isn't it just as humiliating (even more) for his wife to say I won't be your wife unless you give me hundreds of thousands of dollars?
In effect this means the woman isn't with the man for love. To her, his value isn't in his character, his ethic, its simply his ability to transfer assets to her and unless he can afford to risk large losses he isn't worth staying with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did she actually want you to transfer it to her, or did she want to be added onto the deed? Big difference.
she wanted me to give her the house as in she would own it.
Your wording is still unclear.
Was she asking to add her name to deed along with yours? This is what most people mean when they say they want to own their house.
Or was she asking that you transfer the deed to her name and she would take out a mortgage in her name only for the remaining balance?
Yes, OP, please answer this. Was she asking for you to not be on the deed? You seem to be dodging this question.
She wanted me off the deed. She wanted 100% ownership. She wanted me to give her the house. She said she deserved it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did she actually want you to transfer it to her, or did she want to be added onto the deed? Big difference.
she wanted me to give her the house as in she would own it.
Your wording is still unclear.
Was she asking to add her name to deed along with yours? This is what most people mean when they say they want to own their house.
Or was she asking that you transfer the deed to her name and she would take out a mortgage in her name only for the remaining balance?
Yes, OP, please answer this. Was she asking for you to not be on the deed? You seem to be dodging this question.
She wanted me off the deed. She wanted 100% ownership. She wanted me to give her the house. She said she deserved it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did she actually want you to transfer it to her, or did she want to be added onto the deed? Big difference.
she wanted me to give her the house as in she would own it.
Your wording is still unclear.
Was she asking to add her name to deed along with yours? This is what most people mean when they say they want to own their house.
Or was she asking that you transfer the deed to her name and she would take out a mortgage in her name only for the remaining balance?
Yes, OP, please answer this. Was she asking for you to not be on the deed? You seem to be dodging this question.
She wanted me off the deed. She wanted 100% ownership. She wanted me to give her the house. She said she deserved it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did she actually want you to transfer it to her, or did she want to be added onto the deed? Big difference.
she wanted me to give her the house as in she would own it.
Your wording is still unclear.
Was she asking to add her name to deed along with yours? This is what most people mean when they say they want to own their house.
Or was she asking that you transfer the deed to her name and she would take out a mortgage in her name only for the remaining balance?
Yes, OP, please answer this. Was she asking for you to not be on the deed? You seem to be dodging this question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She did a psychological number on you. She sounds awful. Borderline personality.
Please get some therapy to help you see this.
He sounds like he’s the one who has borderline personality disorder.
My friends have all bought houses in the past 10 years snd we’ve all discussed a lot about mortgages and real estate. Everyone has both spouses on the deed of the shared marital home. This holds true when one person contributed the bulk of the equity through a down payment. It’s true if one person contributes the bulk of the mortgage payments because they have the higher paying job. OP’s attitude is the outlier. It’s bizarre enough that it sounds he was projecting some serious issues on his ex wife.
Hope you get help OP.
It sounds like his instincts not to trust her were correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She did a psychological number on you. She sounds awful. Borderline personality.
Please get some therapy to help you see this.
He sounds like he’s the one who has borderline personality disorder.
My friends have all bought houses in the past 10 years snd we’ve all discussed a lot about mortgages and real estate. Everyone has both spouses on the deed of the shared marital home. This holds true when one person contributed the bulk of the equity through a down payment. It’s true if one person contributes the bulk of the mortgage payments because they have the higher paying job. OP’s attitude is the outlier. It’s bizarre enough that it sounds he was projecting some serious issues on his ex wife.
Hope you get help OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OP, I’m a SAHM. I didn’t contribute any money towards my house. My husband paid for everything—and will continue to pay for everything. Both our names are on the deed of our house.
Your views are generally incompatible with marriage.
You must have bought that house together after marriage? OP owned his house before getting married. There is a difference.
There may be a difference but you still don’t put your wife in the position of not having any equity in the property ladder while she works to support a household in which her husband contributes his income to an asset she does not co-own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OP, I’m a SAHM. I didn’t contribute any money towards my house. My husband paid for everything—and will continue to pay for everything. Both our names are on the deed of our house.
Your views are generally incompatible with marriage.
You must have bought that house together after marriage? OP owned his house before getting married. There is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Could you just rent out your premarital house and buy a new one with her? It is indeed humiliating to live and contribute into a home which is not joint, if you are married. My exH bought a house on his name just before marriage and had a massive mortgage. Insisted on living there - I insisted on buying a second home. We divorced in 15 years. He had major trust issues, not me.
Maybe she feels you are not able to commit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OP, I’m a SAHM. I didn’t contribute any money towards my house. My husband paid for everything—and will continue to pay for everything. Both our names are on the deed of our house.
Your views are generally incompatible with marriage.
Madam, you are completely wrong, legally and morally. He bought the house before he got married. It's his house.
His wife sounds just like the wife, now ex-wife, of a friend. She was a pure gold-digger, looking to mine every penny from a hard-working man who saved and invested well.