Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LAMB is a great school. Don’t lottery if you’re going to leave. That just screws other kids.
Seriously. That spot usually doesn’t get back-filled by another kid your kid’s age who really wanted LAMB because they don’t accept hardly any kids after PK3.
This is LAMB's fault, not the posters. None of us know at preK3 what we want long term for our children and the lottery system is built around that fact.
LAMB backfills any spots through Kinder and stops taking new kids at 1st grade. So if someone wants to try LAMB for PK3/PK4 and then moves to the IB for Kinder, that spot is fully usable for someone else. LAMB (and the other charters) can't test for Spanish proficiency. This policy means that it can control for kids coming in at later grades without any Spanish knowledge.
Oh noes! DCPS takes kids without any English knowledge...
They wouldn’t have to do this if pushy poor parenting causes these poor kids to go to school where they are completely lost and don’t understand what’s happening. These parents think they’re giving their kids an opportunity, whereas actually doing some research would prove to them that this is a bad idea. I tutor these poor kids who are not only fully lost in Spanish but are now behind in English and math as well.
You forgot to add that then these parents will blame the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LAMB is a great school. Don’t lottery if you’re going to leave. That just screws other kids.
Seriously. That spot usually doesn’t get back-filled by another kid your kid’s age who really wanted LAMB because they don’t accept hardly any kids after PK3.
This is LAMB's fault, not the posters. None of us know at preK3 what we want long term for our children and the lottery system is built around that fact.
LAMB backfills any spots through Kinder and stops taking new kids at 1st grade. So if someone wants to try LAMB for PK3/PK4 and then moves to the IB for Kinder, that spot is fully usable for someone else. LAMB (and the other charters) can't test for Spanish proficiency. This policy means that it can control for kids coming in at later grades without any Spanish knowledge.
Oh noes! DCPS takes kids without any English knowledge...
I don’t even understand this comment
So refusing to take kids that are harder to serve is a luxury that some schools have and some don't. Think of that when you're patting yourselves on the back for being so much better. Or poor LAMB just can't handle the challenge.
WTF are you talking about? LAMB would kill for a bunch of Spanish dominant kids.
I think Pp is talking about LAMB not wanting kids with no Spanish background after K since it
Will be hard for LAMB to serve them.
Soooooo hard for poor LAMB. DCPS has to take kids who speak no English, in all grade levels, all year round. Why is it doable for DCPS and not for LAMB?
you sound super salty
Do you have an actual answer though?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LAMB is a great school. Don’t lottery if you’re going to leave. That just screws other kids.
Seriously. That spot usually doesn’t get back-filled by another kid your kid’s age who really wanted LAMB because they don’t accept hardly any kids after PK3.
This is LAMB's fault, not the posters. None of us know at preK3 what we want long term for our children and the lottery system is built around that fact.
LAMB backfills any spots through Kinder and stops taking new kids at 1st grade. So if someone wants to try LAMB for PK3/PK4 and then moves to the IB for Kinder, that spot is fully usable for someone else. LAMB (and the other charters) can't test for Spanish proficiency. This policy means that it can control for kids coming in at later grades without any Spanish knowledge.
Oh noes! DCPS takes kids without any English knowledge...
They wouldn’t have to do this if pushy poor parenting causes these poor kids to go to school where they are completely lost and don’t understand what’s happening. These parents think they’re giving their kids an opportunity, whereas actually doing some research would prove to them that this is a bad idea. I tutor these poor kids who are not only fully lost in Spanish but are now behind in English and math as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LAMB is a great school. Don’t lottery if you’re going to leave. That just screws other kids.
Seriously. That spot usually doesn’t get back-filled by another kid your kid’s age who really wanted LAMB because they don’t accept hardly any kids after PK3.
This is LAMB's fault, not the posters. None of us know at preK3 what we want long term for our children and the lottery system is built around that fact.
LAMB backfills any spots through Kinder and stops taking new kids at 1st grade. So if someone wants to try LAMB for PK3/PK4 and then moves to the IB for Kinder, that spot is fully usable for someone else. LAMB (and the other charters) can't test for Spanish proficiency. This policy means that it can control for kids coming in at later grades without any Spanish knowledge.
Except the kid that they admit will be behind, versus the kid who was admitted in pk3 whose spot OP’s kid took. It’s just thoughtless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LAMB is a great school. Don’t lottery if you’re going to leave. That just screws other kids.
Seriously. That spot usually doesn’t get back-filled by another kid your kid’s age who really wanted LAMB because they don’t accept hardly any kids after PK3.
This is LAMB's fault, not the posters. None of us know at preK3 what we want long term for our children and the lottery system is built around that fact.
LAMB backfills any spots through Kinder and stops taking new kids at 1st grade. So if someone wants to try LAMB for PK3/PK4 and then moves to the IB for Kinder, that spot is fully usable for someone else. LAMB (and the other charters) can't test for Spanish proficiency. This policy means that it can control for kids coming in at later grades without any Spanish knowledge.
Oh noes! DCPS takes kids without any English knowledge...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Not worried about additional rankings, if we don't get in we will continue with our private daycare/preschool which is Spanish immersion. I am not a native speaker, but am fluent, speak Spanish at work all day, and speak Spanish with our child. Child speaks as much or more Spanish than English, but would apply as English-dominant. More interested in whether people think LAMB vs Bancroft is worth it in the long-term, as we know Bancroft is well regarded, but think LAMB could be interesting, know we only really have a chance to get in now, and are curious about what people think about the differences, especially the differences between going to the neighborhood school vs one with kids from all over.
LAMB parent here, without any knowledge of Bancroft. I think your child is likely to do well with either school for the Spanish immersion. I think there are 2 factors beyond Spanish though - do you want Montessori and if you plan to stay at said school to MS, which choice would you prefer, Deal (isn't that Bancroft's feeder, but would that change by the time your child hits MS?) or DCI (which I know isn't guaranteed for LAMB at the point you enter MS, but I do think DCI will take steps to make this less of a concern in the future).
And if you take the LAMB spot, I hope that you stay for the long term, but I am not going to chastise you for leaving if it isn't the right school for you. I do agree that it is going to be hard to get into however; LAMB's applications are up 7% from last year, at an already very high application number.
One thing that LAMB does have over Bancroft, IMO, is a much better physical space. The LAMB campus is beautiful and big. Lots of room for kids to eat outside for lunch, as an example. But there is a lot to be said for a neighborhood school.
I haven’t seen LAMB’s space, but Bancroft just had a gorgeous new renovation. What about LAMB’s physical space is superior?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Not worried about additional rankings, if we don't get in we will continue with our private daycare/preschool which is Spanish immersion. I am not a native speaker, but am fluent, speak Spanish at work all day, and speak Spanish with our child. Child speaks as much or more Spanish than English, but would apply as English-dominant. More interested in whether people think LAMB vs Bancroft is worth it in the long-term, as we know Bancroft is well regarded, but think LAMB could be interesting, know we only really have a chance to get in now, and are curious about what people think about the differences, especially the differences between going to the neighborhood school vs one with kids from all over.
LAMB parent here, without any knowledge of Bancroft. I think your child is likely to do well with either school for the Spanish immersion. I think there are 2 factors beyond Spanish though - do you want Montessori and if you plan to stay at said school to MS, which choice would you prefer, Deal (isn't that Bancroft's feeder, but would that change by the time your child hits MS?) or DCI (which I know isn't guaranteed for LAMB at the point you enter MS, but I do think DCI will take steps to make this less of a concern in the future).
And if you take the LAMB spot, I hope that you stay for the long term, but I am not going to chastise you for leaving if it isn't the right school for you. I do agree that it is going to be hard to get into however; LAMB's applications are up 7% from last year, at an already very high application number.
One thing that LAMB does have over Bancroft, IMO, is a much better physical space. The LAMB campus is beautiful and big. Lots of room for kids to eat outside for lunch, as an example. But there is a lot to be said for a neighborhood school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Not worried about additional rankings, if we don't get in we will continue with our private daycare/preschool which is Spanish immersion. I am not a native speaker, but am fluent, speak Spanish at work all day, and speak Spanish with our child. Child speaks as much or more Spanish than English, but would apply as English-dominant. More interested in whether people think LAMB vs Bancroft is worth it in the long-term, as we know Bancroft is well regarded, but think LAMB could be interesting, know we only really have a chance to get in now, and are curious about what people think about the differences, especially the differences between going to the neighborhood school vs one with kids from all over.
LAMB parent here, without any knowledge of Bancroft. I think your child is likely to do well with either school for the Spanish immersion. I think there are 2 factors beyond Spanish though - do you want Montessori and if you plan to stay at said school to MS, which choice would you prefer, Deal (isn't that Bancroft's feeder, but would that change by the time your child hits MS?) or DCI (which I know isn't guaranteed for LAMB at the point you enter MS, but I do think DCI will take steps to make this less of a concern in the future).
And if you take the LAMB spot, I hope that you stay for the long term, but I am not going to chastise you for leaving if it isn't the right school for you. I do agree that it is going to be hard to get into however; [b]LAMB's applications are up 7% from last year, at an already very high application number.
One thing that LAMB does have over Bancroft, IMO, is a much better physical space. The LAMB campus is beautiful and big. Lots of room for kids to eat outside for lunch, as an example. But there is a lot to be said for a neighborhood school.
Just curious how do you know this? Are the schools aware of how many applications they have before the lottery deadline?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Not worried about additional rankings, if we don't get in we will continue with our private daycare/preschool which is Spanish immersion. I am not a native speaker, but am fluent, speak Spanish at work all day, and speak Spanish with our child. Child speaks as much or more Spanish than English, but would apply as English-dominant. More interested in whether people think LAMB vs Bancroft is worth it in the long-term, as we know Bancroft is well regarded, but think LAMB could be interesting, know we only really have a chance to get in now, and are curious about what people think about the differences, especially the differences between going to the neighborhood school vs one with kids from all over.
LAMB parent here, without any knowledge of Bancroft. I think your child is likely to do well with either school for the Spanish immersion. I think there are 2 factors beyond Spanish though - do you want Montessori and if you plan to stay at said school to MS, which choice would you prefer, Deal (isn't that Bancroft's feeder, but would that change by the time your child hits MS?) or DCI (which I know isn't guaranteed for LAMB at the point you enter MS, but I do think DCI will take steps to make this less of a concern in the future).
And if you take the LAMB spot, I hope that you stay for the long term, but I am not going to chastise you for leaving if it isn't the right school for you. I do agree that it is going to be hard to get into however; [b]LAMB's applications are up 7% from last year, at an already very high application number.
One thing that LAMB does have over Bancroft, IMO, is a much better physical space. The LAMB campus is beautiful and big. Lots of room for kids to eat outside for lunch, as an example. But there is a lot to be said for a neighborhood school.
"LAMB's applications are up 7% from last year, at an already very high application number." Just curious how do you know this? Are the schools aware of how many applications they have before the lottery deadline?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Not worried about additional rankings, if we don't get in we will continue with our private daycare/preschool which is Spanish immersion. I am not a native speaker, but am fluent, speak Spanish at work all day, and speak Spanish with our child. Child speaks as much or more Spanish than English, but would apply as English-dominant. More interested in whether people think LAMB vs Bancroft is worth it in the long-term, as we know Bancroft is well regarded, but think LAMB could be interesting, know we only really have a chance to get in now, and are curious about what people think about the differences, especially the differences between going to the neighborhood school vs one with kids from all over.
LAMB parent here, without any knowledge of Bancroft. I think your child is likely to do well with either school for the Spanish immersion. I think there are 2 factors beyond Spanish though - do you want Montessori and if you plan to stay at said school to MS, which choice would you prefer, Deal (isn't that Bancroft's feeder, but would that change by the time your child hits MS?) or DCI (which I know isn't guaranteed for LAMB at the point you enter MS, but I do think DCI will take steps to make this less of a concern in the future).
And if you take the LAMB spot, I hope that you stay for the long term, but I am not going to chastise you for leaving if it isn't the right school for you. I do agree that it is going to be hard to get into however; [b]LAMB's applications are up 7% from last year, at an already very high application number.
One thing that LAMB does have over Bancroft, IMO, is a much better physical space. The LAMB campus is beautiful and big. Lots of room for kids to eat outside for lunch, as an example. But there is a lot to be said for a neighborhood school.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Not worried about additional rankings, if we don't get in we will continue with our private daycare/preschool which is Spanish immersion. I am not a native speaker, but am fluent, speak Spanish at work all day, and speak Spanish with our child. Child speaks as much or more Spanish than English, but would apply as English-dominant. More interested in whether people think LAMB vs Bancroft is worth it in the long-term, as we know Bancroft is well regarded, but think LAMB could be interesting, know we only really have a chance to get in now, and are curious about what people think about the differences, especially the differences between going to the neighborhood school vs one with kids from all over.